Re: [SLUG] Sun Sparcstation5: useful for what ?

2003-09-19 Thread voyteke
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tony Green wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 02:34, Voytek wrote:
  I have here Sun Sparcstation5 box with 32MB RAM and 1GB HD, plus 4GB HD,
  plus tape and some other bits, and, Solaris CDs:
  what it is usefull for:

 You could use it to compile a list of all of the questions you've asked
 and answers you've gotten from SLUG.  A bit of perl and a webserver and
 you'll have the most complete linux documentation repository in the
 history of the world.

Tony,

I was going to, but, I think I'd need a bigger hard drive to fit all the 
voytek-traffic,

;)


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] seg fault in passwd, can I 'rpm passwd' ?

2003-09-10 Thread voyteke
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:45:27 +0100 (IST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


hmm .. that lseeks call is very wrong.. try doing same with ltrace..

Dave,


[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ltrace passwd voytek
__libc_start_main(0x08049940, 2, 0xbfffed34, 0x08048d10, 0x0804a7b0 unfinished ...
__register_frame_info(0x0804c1f4, 0x0804c478, 0xbfffecd8, 0x080490ce, 0x08048d10) = 
0x0804c1f4
basename(passwd)= passwd
poptGetContext(0x0804b0dc, 2, 0xbfffed34, 0xbfffeaa0, 0) = 0x0804c4b8
poptSetOtherOptionHelp(0x0804c4b8, 0x0804a853, 0, 0, 0) = 0x0804c688
poptGetNextOpt(0x0804c4b8, 0x0804a853, 0, 0, 0)   = -1
poptGetArgs(0x0804c4b8, 0x0804a853, 0, 0, 0)  = 0x0804c650
getuid()  = 0
strlen(0xbc34, 0x0804c650, 0xbfffec28, 0x080497ae, 0) = 6
getpwnam(voytek)= 0x421321b0
printf(Changing password for user %s.\n, voytekChanging password for user voytek.
) = 35
pam_start(0x0804b0dc, 0xbc34, 0x0804c1dc, 0xbfffec5c, 0x4000b0a6) = 0
pam_fail_delay(0x0804cb58, 0x001e8480, 0x0804c1dc, 0xbfffec5c, 0x4000b0a6) = 0
pam_chauthtok(0x0804cb58, 0, 0x0804c1dc, 0xbfffec5c, 0x4000b0a6 unfinished ...
misc_conv(1, 0xbfff8998, 0xbfff899c, 0, 0xbfffa9b0New password:
) = 0
(data fseek failed): Invalid argument
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] sig sev dump #2

2003-09-10 Thread voyteke
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:19:24 +1000 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Oscar, I'll try once more

hmm, sorry, I'll upload the whole dump tommorow, clearly my 'mailto' syntax know how 
is not up to it... even though it did say 'file included' after I put '~ d xx'.

anyhow, the last few lines are:



)   = 1
open(/usr/lib/cracklib_dict.pwd, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/usr/lib/cracklib_dict.pwi, O_RDONLY) = 4
open(/usr/lib/cracklib_dict.hwm, O_RDONLY) = 5
fstat64(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=42034, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40015000
read(4, 1Vwp\327\221\2\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\0u\0\0\0\342\0\0\0N\1\0..., 4096) = 4096
fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=982, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4002
read(5, \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0..., 4096) = 982
read(5, , 4096)   = 0
getuid32()  = 0
open(/etc/passwd, O_RDONLY)   = 6
fcntl64(6, F_GETFD) = 0
fcntl64(6, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
fstat64(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=4526, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000
read(6, root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash\n..., 4096) = 4096
close(6)= 0
munmap(0x40021000, 4096)= 0
_llseek(4, 20480, [20480], SEEK_SET)= 0
read(4, g\6\0\36h\6\0gh\6\0\255h\6\0\3i\6\0Ji\6\0\226i\6\0\362..., 4096) = 4096
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=828083, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000
_llseek(3, 18446744072216379392, 0xbfff6e50, SEEK_SET) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
write(2, (data fseek failed): Invalid arg..., 38(data fseek failed): Invalid argument
) = 38
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
#
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] Postfix for vhosting: 'transport' method ? full-Q address asusername ?

2003-09-03 Thread voyteke
I'd like to setup Postifx for handling multiple mail virtual hosts,
I need to be able to support multiple same.user.name @ different vhosts as
different email accounts

i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is different email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the end users and domains do NOT have another mail server at their site,
they all POP retrieve mail from this server.

all MX records point to this server
no user connect directly to the server, POP only, and SMTP is handled by
their ISP

so far, I've installed Postifx with /Maildir support, and, now I'm looking
at creating virtual host support, and, (virtual) users @virtual hosts.


looking at Blum's Postfix book (SAMS 2001) it tell me:

--
Ch.11 Configuring Postfix as an ISP Mail Server.
Configuring Postfix for Virtual Domains

..you can use three different methods...:

- receive mail for an entire V domain;
- receive mail for individual users in v domain;
- use transport lookup table for v domains
-

this basically implies I should use the 'transport table' method

Q: am I heading in the right direction so far ?

under a 'Caution' warning, Blum's warns of 'potential duplicate user names
when using 'transport table' method':

Q: should I then be creating system user names for virtual mail host
in the 'fully qulified email address' format of:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

with corresponding

/home/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Maildir
/home/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Maildir

?

any help, suggestions, pointers, references and sample config files
appreciated



Voytek Eymont


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] which kernel archive do I need, 386 or 686 ?

2003-09-03 Thread voyteke
** Reply to note from Chris Deigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 31 Aug 2003 07:07:53 +0800


 This way, say if I accidently close the terminal, I can go back to it 
 with screen -r. 
  
 Have a look at man screen.

Chris,

I had a brief look, so, that will run the session
detached, and, it will complete regadless if the ssh session stays
connected , if I understood it correctly from a quick read.

thanks for suggestion,

Voytek Eymont


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] SquirelMail without IMAP ? POP ? /Maildir ?

2003-09-03 Thread voyteke
** Reply to note from Gonzalo Servat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:31:09 
+1000


 Why is installing an IMAP server such a problem?

Gonzalo, thanks for all the anwsers

well, I actually did install CourierIMAP (though haven't configured as yet)
basically, I have never used or administered one before, users haven't
asked for one, and, after reading some of the docs, it seemed to me I might
be creating more work for myself.

I guess now that I compilied and installed it, I'll at least have a
good look at it, but at this point I don't see much advantage to me, to
have to run it, and, suspect it might require more than POP (like the
quotas etc.

plus I guess i have to provide the storage space, though I suspect that
wouldn't be an issue

from an admin perpective, is IMAP a better choice over POP ?



Voytek Eymont


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] importing mail users ?

2003-08-29 Thread voyteke
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:22:41 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Scott, thanks

What do you want them imported from? The web server? windows machine? flat 
file?
If its a flat file, whats it look like?

at this time, they're in my mail server user database, which happens to be dBase 
format(as in Ashton Tate) dbf file

I was aiming at exporting it to text, either tab del or csv.
so, I can massage them into whatever will suit the target format.

the actual files has stuff like:
REALNAME,USERNAME,POP3NAME,DOMAIN,EMAILDIR,PASSWORD,PASSTYPE,FORWDFLAG,FORWDADDR,CCFLAG,CCADDR,PROCFLAG,PROCNAME,VACFLAG,USERID,IPMASK,WEBPWD,WEBADMIN,MAXMSGS,MAXBYTES,FTPDOFF,MAILOFF

needless to say, the more i can import the happier I'll be...

If I remember correctly, you need to do one of two things:
/etc/init.d/proftpd stop ; chkconfig --delete proftpd (It won't delete 
proftpd, just stop it from running on startup)
edit /etc/xinetd.d/ftpd (or similar ) and change line DISABLE = no to yes.

no, I need to have FTPd for the dozen or so web hosts, but, I thought I ought to 
prevent potential ftp access from mail-only users


 should I also CHOWN all /home/username(s) to be owned by root ?
 
If they have no shell/ftp/anything access besides pop  smtp, is there any 
reason to change the permissions?

well, some SLUGgers suggested that, and, I thought 'why not' 

How have you disabled them from logging in?

yes

by way of explanation: I have some web vhost users, these need ftp access, then I have 
mail users, JUST pop, NO smtp (they use an ISP)

at this time, I have created all web vhost users with user name=domain.name, and, hve 
set the /home/mydomain.com.au, and, Apache vhost stuff.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] targeted virus or paranoia central ?

2003-08-28 Thread voyteke
during last weekend, I received several hundred of the the latest ms
'virus' emails, all about 100k, with about 7 different subjects. on Monday,
the flow slowed down, just maybe a hundred or so all day, and, I assumed
the worst was over, so to speak.

However, between Tuesday and Wed this week, I received in excess of 1,000
emails in say 12 hours, and, when I looked at it in the afternoon, I was
getting one new mssg every minute.

looking at mailboxes of several hundred users, it was only my own email
that was being hit so much, likewise, the admin of email on other servers
where my server is hosted doesn't see *that many* virus hits across his
servers.

Suggestions were made to me that perhaps I was 'targeted' with it ?

- how much of the crap are others getting ?

the actual payload dosn't worry me, but, I don't want to pay for the
traffic, so, in the end, as an interim measure, I've deleted my own email
address (as to refuse this crap at smtp server)

I suppose the only way to stop it, traffic-wise, would be to filter
upstream ?

I thought ms tax only applied when you bought a new PC, seems, ms tax is a
lot broader



Voytek Eymont
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug