Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-05-01 Thread Martin Visser
Amos' advice below is actually not correct in all circumstances. If
you are shrinking a NTFS filesystem, you should *NOT* change the host
partition size with fdisk first. By doing this, ntfsresize will no
longer have access to the tail of the partition you have chopped
off, and you will have a broken NTFS filesystem (The tail would be
left in unallocated space)

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1
   above) didnt work.
  
Is it safe to use sudo ntfsresize  --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1 or do I 
 risk
   losing my data?

  You should first resize the partition in the partition table (using
  fdisk, delete then re-create the partition, change its type to 7
  (NTFS)), have you done that?
  After that is done, ntfsresize will by default automatically resize
  the file system to occupy the entire partition (see the bottom of the
  output from running ntfsresize without arguments).

  --Amos


 --
  SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
  Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html




-- 
Regards, Martin

Martin Visser
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-05-01 Thread Martin Visser
An unchecked NTFS filesystem can be mounted in Ubuntu, but only if you
force it to be mounted read-only (so at least you can read the data)

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a 120gb SATA HD formatted NTFS ( 2 partitions - dont think 2nd is
 used/formatted as only 1 shows up) in my Kubuntu Hardy PC.

  Cant mount the HD, requires CHKDSK to be run as error message says drive
 not shut down properly.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Thanks Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-30 Thread bill

Thanks for the reply Amos

Prior to your advice I tried G4L but stuffed it by reversing 
Source/Target . Dont know what data I lost ( Home PC), but nothing 
irreplaceable I think.


Oh well, at least I now have an empty 120gb SATA HD that I can reformat 
for Linux.


Thanks again

Bill


Subject:
Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?
From:
Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:03:20 +1000
To:
SLUG slug@slug.org.au

To:
SLUG slug@slug.org.au


On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

 Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1
above) didnt work.

 Is it safe to use sudo ntfsresize  --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1 or do I risk
losing my data?



You should first resize the partition in the partition table (using
fdisk, delete then re-create the partition, change its type to 7
(NTFS)), have you done that?
After that is done, ntfsresize will by default automatically resize
the file system to occupy the entire partition (see the bottom of the
output from running ntfsresize without arguments).

--Amos

  






--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-29 Thread bill
I have a 120gb SATA HD formatted NTFS ( 2 partitions - dont think 2nd is 
used/formatted as only 1 shows up) in my Kubuntu Hardy PC.


Cant mount the HD, requires CHKDSK to be run as error message says drive 
not shut down properly.


Havent had an XP install on any of my Desktop PCS for 2 years now, so 
cant fix problem that way. Dont want to have to do an XP install ( with 
all stuffing around to get and install mobo SATA drivers), so I tried 
the following, gleaned from Googling :-


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1
ntfsresize v2.0.0 (libntfs 10:0:0)
Device name: /dev/sda1
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size   : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 57675629056 bytes (57676 MB)
Current device size: 57675631104 bytes (57676 MB)
Checking filesystem consistency ...
100.00 percent completed
Accounting clusters ...
Space in use   : 43896 MB (76.1%)
Collecting resizing constraints ...
You might resize at 43895435264 bytes or 43896 MB (freeing 13780 MB).
Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real 
resizing!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo ntfsresize -n --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1
ntfsresize v2.0.0 (libntfs 10:0:0)
Device name: /dev/sda1
NTFS volume version: 3.1
Cluster size   : 4096 bytes
Current volume size: 57675629056 bytes (57676 MB)
Current device size: 57675631104 bytes (57676 MB)
New volume size: 43895992832 bytes (43896 MB)
Checking filesystem consistency ...
100.00 percent completed
Accounting clusters ...
Space in use   : 43896 MB (76.1%)
Collecting resizing constraints ...
Needed relocations : 3364169 (13780 MB)
Schedule chkdsk for NTFS consistency check at Windows boot time ...
Resetting $LogFile ... (this might take a while)
Relocating needed data ...
100.00 percent completed
Updating $BadClust file ...
Updating $Bitmap file ...
Updating Boot record ...
The read-only test run ended successfully.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$


Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo ntfsresize -i 
/dev/sda1 above) didnt work.


Is it safe to use sudo ntfsresize  --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1 or do I 
risk losing my data?


Thanks

Bill
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-29 Thread Amos Shapira
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1
 above) didnt work.

  Is it safe to use sudo ntfsresize  --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1 or do I risk
 losing my data?

You should first resize the partition in the partition table (using
fdisk, delete then re-create the partition, change its type to 7
(NTFS)), have you done that?
After that is done, ntfsresize will by default automatically resize
the file system to occupy the entire partition (see the bottom of the
output from running ntfsresize without arguments).

--Amos
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html