Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-03 Thread Anand Kumria
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:24:08PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
 Yes.
 
  4) auto-archiving and searches etc would be nice too
 
 Archiving, sure, but it's arsy internal pipermail foo. SLUG uses MHonArc (as
 does gnome.org), and I know that Anand has patches for Mailman to use
 MHonArc similiarly to pipermail (our changes use external archiver support),

Which is at URL: http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/code/ in case anyone
else wants it too.

Anand

-- 
 `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think.
 When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never
 leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-02 Thread David Fitch
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 21:47, David wrote:
 
 mailman/woody is fine, and I have it running nicely and it is very
 reliable etc... and I highly recommend it.
 
 However if you do a simple apt-get install mailman from woody you will run
 into a permissions problem when you try to access your new list. Somebody
 stuffed up!

yeah seems to be to do with creating locks

 I don't have the fix to hand, but it's fairly simple and I know at least
 one person who is on this list knows how to do it ;-)

the lock dir doesn't seem to have list write permissions
but increasing that doesn't seem to have helped.

And maybe I'm missing something but:
I run newlist but it doesn't tell me what aliases to add to
/etc/aliases (like the doco says it should) and nor does
emailing newlist@mydomain work.  It feels like there's a
step missing.

Dave.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-02 Thread David Fitch

[just replying to myself...]

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 22:42, David Fitch wrote:
 On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 21:47, David wrote:
  However if you do a simple apt-get install mailman from woody you will run
  into a permissions problem when you try to access your new list. Somebody
  stuffed up!
 
 yeah seems to be to do with creating locks

not fixed this one yet

  I don't have the fix to hand, but it's fairly simple and I know at least
  one person who is on this list knows how to do it ;-)
 
 the lock dir doesn't seem to have list write permissions
 but increasing that doesn't seem to have helped.
 
 And maybe I'm missing something but:
 I run newlist but it doesn't tell me what aliases to add to
 /etc/aliases (like the doco says it should) and nor does
 emailing newlist@mydomain work.  It feels like there's a
 step missing.

ok the missing step was me reading the output from newlist
properly!  got that one sorted now.

Dave.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-01 Thread Tony Green
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 14:56, David Fitch wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 what's the current favourite software for running a mailing
 list?  (debian woody and postfix)
 I've found tons of them but am after a recommendation on
 something simple (and preferably small) for small numbers
 of list members of only a couple of lists.
 
Mailman seems to fit most, if not all, of your requirements.  Some
people have a real problem with it, but I think it does the job very
well.

Greeno



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-01 Thread Howard Lowndes
On 2 Dec 2002, Tony Green wrote:

 On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 14:56, David Fitch wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  what's the current favourite software for running a mailing
  list?  (debian woody and postfix)
  I've found tons of them but am after a recommendation on
  something simple (and preferably small) for small numbers
  of list members of only a couple of lists.
 
 Mailman seems to fit most, if not all, of your requirements.  Some
 people have a real problem with it, but I think it does the job very
 well.

Agree.
No problems here.
Agree.


 Greeno


-- 
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people
Contact detail at http://www.lannetlinux.com
Flatter government, not fatter government. - me
 Get rid of the Australian states.
--
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-01 Thread Gonzalo Servat
On 2/12/2002 3:03 PM +1100 Howard Lowndes wrote:



On 2 Dec 2002, Tony Green wrote:

Mailman seems to fit most, if not all, of your requirements.  Some
people have a real problem with it, but I think it does the job very
well.


Agree.
No problems here.
Agree.


FWIW, from your list of main requirements, I also think Mailman is your 
best choice. It can also handle large number of mailing lists  users (even 
though you are only going to have a couple, it's good to know..)

Gonz.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] mailing list software

2002-12-01 Thread David Fitch

thanks guys, I'll give mailman a go.

Dave.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mailing list software recommendations

2002-03-22 Thread Rev Simon Rumble

On Sat 23 Mar, Andre Pang bloviated thus:

 So far, everything I've tried expects that I dump it into the
 /etc/aliases file (or whatever the equivalent is) :(.  Even the
 specific non-root ones like minordomo etc don't really do what I
 want.

ALL of them should be able to work in a non-root environment, but if
you want to have addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'll
need access to that /etc/aliases file.

Perhaps you have access on the machine hosting your email but not the
machine hosting the lists?  Well with an intelligent mailer (Postfix,
qmail et al) you should be able to set it up to accept mail of the
type [EMAIL PROTECTED]  So you could point from the first
machine to the second machine and then have procmail split stuff out.

The docs always talk about using /etc/aliases because that's the most
straightforward way to do it.  You can still do it other ways but
you'll have to be creative.

-- 
Rev Simon Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rumble.net
Send email with subject send key pub for public key.

See, the problem is that God gives men a brain and a penis,
and only enough blood to run one at a time.

- Robin Williams



msg21843/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [SLUG] mailing list software recommendations

2002-03-22 Thread Andre Pang

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 03:05:13PM +, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:

  So far, everything I've tried expects that I dump it into the
  /etc/aliases file (or whatever the equivalent is) :(.  Even the
  specific non-root ones like minordomo etc don't really do what I
  want.
 
 ALL of them should be able to work in a non-root environment, but if
 you want to have addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'll
 need access to that /etc/aliases file.

Many webhosting companies will have a 'catch all' mailbox which
accepts mail for any email address sent to a domain, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
all go to the same mailbox.  So you don't need access to the
/etc/aliases file; you can do it via .procmailrc or other means.

(Side point: qmail has really nice support for user mailing
 lists, but my webhost isn't running qmail.)


-- 
#ozone/algorithm [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - trust.in.love.to.save
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug