[sniffer] Change in default settings

2011-05-09 Thread Pete McNeil

Hello Message Sniffer Folks,

We're recommending a change in the default settings for message sniffer 
in order to improve our response times for new campaigns. The change is 
small and enhances our virtual spamtrap technology so that we see new 
spams sooner and with greater sampling coverage.


If you locate this block of code in your snf_engine.xml file:

black on-off='on' symbol='63'
edge probability='0.8' confidence='0.2'/
edge probability='0.8' confidence='1.0'/
truncate on-off='on' probability='0.9' peek-one-in='3' symbol='20'/
sample on-off='on' probability='0.8' grab-one-in='3' passthrough='no' 
passthrough-symbol='0'/

/black

You will notice that your settings are probably slightly different.

The changes we would like you to make are:

peek-one-in='3'
grab-one-in='3'

Your current settings most likely use higher numbers for these settings.

Once you make the change and save your file then Message Sniffer should 
pick up the changes right away - you do not need to restart Message 
Sniffer when making adjustments to your configuration.


Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

_M

--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com



[sniffer] Re: Change in default settings

2011-05-09 Thread Pete McNeil

On 5/9/2011 3:43 PM, Peer-to-Peer (Support) wrote:

Hi Pete,

Just double checking:  My snf_engine.xml file does not have any 'single
quotes' around any numbers or characters.
See attached as an example.


What you have there in that png is your configuration log -- it is SNF's 
interpretation of your configuration file. The actual configuration file 
does use single quotes (unless you changed it).


_M

--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com



[sniffer] Re: Change in default settings

2011-05-09 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Pete, for

sample on-off='on'

I wrote myself this note...

!-- We can sample during a peek if passthrough = yes --

... Is it still valid? Your sample and my own configuration have:

passthrough=no

On the balance of it, I suspect my own note is wrong, so it would be
nice if you could verify it one way or the other.


Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:56 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Change in default settings


Hello Message Sniffer Folks,

We're recommending a change in the default settings for message sniffer 
in order to improve our response times for new campaigns. The change is 
small and enhances our virtual spamtrap technology so that we see new 
spams sooner and with greater sampling coverage.

If you locate this block of code in your snf_engine.xml file:

black on-off='on' symbol='63'
edge probability='0.8' confidence='0.2'/
edge probability='0.8' confidence='1.0'/
truncate on-off='on' probability='0.9' peek-one-in='3' symbol='20'/
sample on-off='on' probability='0.8' grab-one-in='3' passthrough='no' 
passthrough-symbol='0'/
/black

You will notice that your settings are probably slightly different.

The changes we would like you to make are:

peek-one-in='3'
grab-one-in='3'

Your current settings most likely use higher numbers for these settings.

Once you make the change and save your file then Message Sniffer should 
pick up the changes right away - you do not need to restart Message 
Sniffer when making adjustments to your configuration.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

_M

-- 
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com



[sniffer] Re: Change in default settings

2011-05-09 Thread Pete McNeil

On 5/9/2011 4:53 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:

Pete, for

sample on-off='on'

I wrote myself this note...

!-- We can sample during a peek if passthrough = yes --

... Is it still valid? Your sample and my own configuration have:

passthrough=no

On the balance of it, I suspect my own note is wrong, so it would be
nice if you could verify it one way or the other.


The passthrough option is for local sampling. We have used it 
occasionally on our spamtrap processors, but not for some time. 
Passthrough takes any messages that would have been samples and instead 
of sending them to the virtual spamtrap network it lets them go through 
with a specific result code. Presumably the local system would see the 
special result code and treat the message differently.


Please leave passthrough='no'

Thanks!

_M

--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com



[sniffer] Re: Change in default settings

2011-05-09 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Great. I'll remove the erroneous comment I made in my configuration
files.

FWIW, I've set both peek-one-in='3' and grab-one-in='3' as the new
recommended default.


Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 3:05 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Change in default settings


On 5/9/2011 4:53 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
 Pete, for

 sample on-off='on'

 I wrote myself this note...

 !-- We can sample during a peek if passthrough = yes --

 ... Is it still valid? Your sample and my own configuration have:

 passthrough=no

 On the balance of it, I suspect my own note is wrong, so it would be
 nice if you could verify it one way or the other.

The passthrough option is for local sampling. We have used it 
occasionally on our spamtrap processors, but not for some time. 
Passthrough takes any messages that would have been samples and instead 
of sending them to the virtual spamtrap network it lets them go through 
with a specific result code. Presumably the local system would see the 
special result code and treat the message differently.

Please leave passthrough='no'

Thanks!

_M

-- 
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com
Send administrative queries to  sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com