Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon
On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote: JM Pete, JM The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon, so far so I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data! JM good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer JM integration much better than the declude integration. We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new improvements :-) snip/ JM Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck JM in the bad message queue but I recieved my original post to the JM list. Any thoughts? Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if JM you can so I don't have to read the response from my bad message JM queue when it comes from the list. Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something there that needs to be fixed. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon
Hello I received messages of this kind me too. Then I must understand that the cause is MDaemon and not iMail? Alberto -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: venerdì 19 agosto 2005 20.03 To: Jim Matuska Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching to Mdaemon On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote: JM Pete, JM The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon, so far so I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data! JM good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer JM integration much better than the declude integration. We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new improvements :-) snip/ JM Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck JM in the bad message queue but I recieved my original post to the JM list. Any thoughts? Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if JM you can so I don't have to read the response from my bad message JM queue when it comes from the list. Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something there that needs to be fixed. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
