RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk
I would be interested in the script if you are willing to share. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:50 PM To: Matt Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 7:16:50 PM, Matt wrote: M Pete, M I've been meaning to add a link to a script from within Killer M WebMail that will allow me to report things to you with a single M click. If I do this, am I correct in assuming that I should just use M something like CDONTS to construct a mail and place the original M source as the body? If not, what would be the preferred method? I think that should work fine for reporting spam. M Note that I have original D*.SMD files for everything in the range of M E-mails that I would consider reporting (using Declude's COPYFILE). M Generally speaking, this would be a customized setup, although M achievable by anyone with IMail and Declude. The hack to KWM is just M some JavaScript to extract the spool data file name from my message M headers that I insert (full headers must be turned on in Web mail), M and this links to an ASP script on my server that handles everything M else. This all sounds like a good idea. There are likely to be a few IMail/WebMail folks around for a while. This sounds like it's not for the technically timid though. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 1:23:59 PM, Rick wrote: RR It would be incredibly convenient if we could report spam emails in bulk RR rather than individually (i.e. select all the spam emails in outlook and RR then forward via one email (with all the emails as attachments to you). RR During this latest storm, I'm finding that I don't have time to report 100's RR of spam emails and just delete most of them. RR Any way this process can be streamlined? Unfortunately there really is no practical way for us to break down packages like this and deal with them efficiently. In any case, 100's of spam sounds like a more serious problem than a spam storm. Have you checked for other problems? _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk
100's of spams a problem, LOL! Before sniffer I was facing around 10 thousand spams a day. But then I'm coordinating 1000's of domains, so on a per domain basis, it's actually very small. I think what I'll do is route a combined spam report email to a server script which will break it down and resubmit individual messages to your spam@ address. However, this will still be sent to you as an attachment. The advantage is that the original header info will be in place, the disadvantage is that you might still be ignoring messages with attachments, right? If you don't take spam report messages with attachments, how would you be able to get the original internet header mail info? Rick Robeson getlocalnews.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:49 AM To: Rick Robeson Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 1:23:59 PM, Rick wrote: RR It would be incredibly convenient if we could report spam emails in bulk RR rather than individually (i.e. select all the spam emails in outlook and RR then forward via one email (with all the emails as attachments to you). RR During this latest storm, I'm finding that I don't have time to report 100's RR of spam emails and just delete most of them. RR Any way this process can be streamlined? Unfortunately there really is no practical way for us to break down packages like this and deal with them efficiently. In any case, 100's of spam sounds like a more serious problem than a spam storm. Have you checked for other problems? _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re[2]: [sniffer] reporting spam in bulk
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 7:16:50 PM, Matt wrote: M Pete, M I've been meaning to add a link to a script from within Killer WebMail M that will allow me to report things to you with a single click. If I do M this, am I correct in assuming that I should just use something like M CDONTS to construct a mail and place the original source as the body? M If not, what would be the preferred method? I think that should work fine for reporting spam. M Note that I have original D*.SMD files for everything in the range of M E-mails that I would consider reporting (using Declude's COPYFILE). M Generally speaking, this would be a customized setup, although M achievable by anyone with IMail and Declude. The hack to KWM is just M some JavaScript to extract the spool data file name from my message M headers that I insert (full headers must be turned on in Web mail), and M this links to an ASP script on my server that handles everything else. This all sounds like a good idea. There are likely to be a few IMail/WebMail folks around for a while. This sounds like it's not for the technically timid though. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
