Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread Chuck Anderson

At 01:18 PM 12/23/2007, you wrote:
So Chuck,  Tell us how the tension limiter worked and how well it 
worked. What were the good points and problems?  Could such a scheme 
be used effectively today?


The Jam/Feb 1977 issue of Sailplane contained an article by Chet 
Tuthill describing the winch system developed by Jim Robinson and 
other members of the Coffee Airfoilers model airplane club.  The 
tension limiter was a major part of that article.  The tension 
limiter was a separate base for the standard winch.  For normal 
flying, the winch was removed from the base and used  like any other winch.


The base for the winch  had a pivot just ahead of the CG of the winch 
and battery and had a microswitch at the rear of the platform.  The 
tension limiter switch was wired in series with the foot peddle.  A 
spring held the platform against the switch until line tension caused 
the platform to rock forward opening the tension limiter 
switch.  When line tension decreased, the spring forced the platform 
aft closing the switch.  The inertia of the winch and battery gave a 
very smooth pulsing when launching larger models if the contestant 
held the foot peddle down and let the winch do the pulsing.


The tension limiter proved to be very reliable and we used if for 
many years.  As usual, there ain't no free lunch.  The tension 
limiter winch took a few minutes longer to set up but the 
considerable reduction in broken lines made it worth while.  The 
tension limiter was set by attaching a 25 pound spring scale to the 
tow ring and the bolt compressing the spring was screwed down until 
the desired pull was reached with the foot peddle held down.  We 
checked the tension limiter between rounds and adjusted as necessary 
to maintain a contestant pull.   The winch and turnaround were both 
mounted on the ground so the tension usually changed as the dew on 
the grass evaporated.   Mounting the winch and turnaround off the 
ground would reduce this problem.


After a few years, we began receiving complaints about not being able 
to zoom so in order to satisfy those who came to zoom instead of 
thermal, we added a bypass switch.  If the contestant chose to bypass 
the tension limiter, NO RELAUNCHES were permitted for broken tow 
lines.  A few people had trouble taping the peddle while the tension 
limiter was cycling.  These fliers could usually get better launches 
by putting the metal to the metal and letting the tension limiter do 
the tapping.  Fliers with Oly II's and similar models didn't notice 
any difference from normal winches.


We finally got tired of listening to complaints about not being able 
to get good zooms so discontinued using the tension limiter and went 
to heavier towlines.  The original tension limiter base is still 
rusting in the weeds behind my shed in the woods behind my house.


Chuck Anderson

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread tony estep
Chuck Anderson wrote:
...Jam/Feb 1977...very smooth pulsing...if the contestant

held the foot peddle down and let the winch do the pulsingtension 
limiter proved to be very reliable and we used if for

many yearsthe original tension limiter base is still

rusting in the weeds behind my shed in the woods behind my house.

=
Really interesting, Chuck. Proves there's nothing new under the sun.

Probably also proves that talk about F3B winches, limits on TD winches, etc. is 
unrealistic and that the quest for max catapult power will continue unabated.



Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread Jack Strother
We ran one of those in Cincinnati, for years, It was mine that I had built, 
from the plans, that I think I still have.
We quit using it for the very reasons that Chuck has stated.
I ended up giving the frame away...Damn it was 30 years ago

--
Jack Strother   
Granger, IN 

LSF 2948
LSF Level V  #117
LSF Official 1996 - 2004
CSS Gold



 -- Original message --
From: tony estep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chuck Anderson wrote:
 ...Jam/Feb 1977...very smooth pulsing...if the contestant
 
 held the foot peddle down and let the winch do the pulsingtension 
 limiter proved to be very reliable and we used if for
 
 many yearsthe original tension limiter base is still
 
 rusting in the weeds behind my shed in the woods behind my house.
 
 =
 Really interesting, Chuck. Proves there's nothing new under the sun.
 
 Probably also proves that talk about F3B winches, limits on TD winches, etc. 
 is 
 unrealistic and that the quest for max catapult power will continue unabated.
 


---BeginMessage---
Chuck Anderson wrote:...Jam/Feb 1977...very smooth pulsing...if the contestant
held the foot peddle down and let the winch do the pulsingtension limiter proved to be very reliable and we used if for
many yearsthe original tension limiter base is still
rusting in the weeds behind my shed in the woods behind my house.
=Really interesting, Chuck. Proves there's nothing new under the sun.Probably also proves that talk about F3B winches, limits on TD winches, etc. is unrealistic and that the quest for max catapult power will continue unabated.---End Message---


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-24 Thread Chuck Anderson
This afternoon, I went out in the woods behind my garage and dug out 
the original tension limiter winch base and brushed off the leaves to 
take some photographs.  The base is rusty and  the wiring is shot but 
could be refurbished with a little sand blasting, painting, 
and  replace the  wiring.  I posted the photos on RC Groups for those 
who would like to know what it looked like.


Chuck Anderson

At 09:50 AM 12/24/2007, you wrote:
We ran one of those in Cincinnati, for years, It was mine that I had 
built, from the plans, that I think I still have.

We quit using it for the very reasons that Chuck has stated.
I ended up giving the frame away...Damn it was 30 years ago

--
Jack Strother
Granger, IN

LSF 2948
LSF Level V  #117
LSF Official 1996 - 2004
CSS Gold


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-23 Thread James MacLean
So Chuck,  Tell us how the tension limiter worked and how well it worked. 
What were the good points and problems?  Could such a scheme be used 
effectively today?


Regards,  Jim MacLean 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-22 Thread Chuck Anderson

I did and used such a winch over 30 years ago.

Chuck Anderson


At 02:40 PM 12/21/2007, you wrote:
There have been various proposals about limiting winch current via a 
series resistor, but nobody has mentioned directly governing line tension.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] line tension

2007-12-21 Thread tony estep
There have been various proposals about limiting winch current via a series 
resistor, but nobody has mentioned directly governing line tension. It is 
certainly possible to devise a gizmo that would measure line tension, average 
it over some desired interval, and limit current flow to the winch so that line 
tension would be capped at some pre-determined amount. Commercial tension 
meters are common in industrial uses, and it would be straightforward to adapt 
their design to this purpose.

If you broke the line while using this scheme, it definitely wouldn't be your 
fault, and you'd get a relaunch. Whether the pilot pulsed or not, the equipment 
wouldn't be overloaded. Every contest would provide identical launching power, 
and plane designers would know exactly what parameters to use in trying to 
optimize the plane's performance.



Re: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-21 Thread James MacLean
Tony,  I have given the auto line tensioner a bit of thought.  Measuring with a 
three pulley sort of thing and a strain gauge on the moveable pulley or an 
optical sensor approach should be pretty feasable and low cost.  Two problems 
remain: a motor controller will be very expensive for any analog sort of 
approach - power FETs ain't that cheap!  Which leaves a bang bang sort of 
controller.  Stability issues should be manageable BUT, the pulses to the 
solenoids will be many and pretty fast unless we use some sort of micro 
processor to intelligently control things.

I don't have the machining tools or skill to make the sensor but in theory it 
should be fairly simple. I have some crude ideas.  The design must allow for 
fast line speeds and have low mass / inertia on the sensor.  The controller 
should be pretty cheap as it is a simple 4 bit micro and a FET or relay to 
control the winch solenoid.  I envision a small box for the controller which 
has its own battery supply and plugs between the foot pedal and the winch.  The 
tension is adjusted at the sensor which sits astride the return winch line 
about 50 feet out.  The pilot pulses as he wishes.  If the tension gets too 
high - the winch pulses itself.

Anyone with a machine shop want to have a go at making a reasonable cost line 
tension sensor?  I could breadboard up the rest in crude form and see what 
happens and refine the controller from there.  I have two advantages:  I fly 
with the Orlando Buzzards who are really good guys and like to compete and have 
pretty good weather.  I am an electrical designer so that helps a bit.

It is possible that a cleverly made sensor would have nothing more on it 
electrical than a really good micro travel switch and that switch would be in 
series with the pedal.  If the stability / solenoid pulse rate issues are not 
too bad that alone might work.  It should be pretty low cost - if less than 
$100, should be real practical for most contests to have such a thing.

Just thoughts.  Comments?  Merry Christmas Everyone!  Jim MacLean

[RCSE] line tension

2007-12-21 Thread tony estep
James MacLean wrote:
...I have given the auto line
tensioner a bit of thoughta bang bang sort
of controllerthe sensor...should be fairly simpleThe controller...a 
simple 4 bit micro and a FET or relay to control the
winch solenoid
=
Yep, that's what I was thinking, Jim. 

The sensor wouldn't have to be fabricated; sensors are available commercially 
from various sources, including:

http://www.tensionmeters.com/elec.htm#MPHB-Series,%20Base%20Mount,%20Three%20Tension%20Sensors

The sensor needs to be mounted on a sturdy frame that can be staked down. That 
would have to be machined, but it's a simple part. The controller should allow 
for integration of the readings over a variable interval, and should have 
circuitry to introduce hysteresis so that it pulses the winch solenoid at a 
pace that doesn't overload anything. When you think about it, the electronics 
aren't complicated.

This could, at least in theory, address lots of issues. If the gadgets turned 
out to be not too expensive, it might catch on. 



RE: [RCSE] line tension

2007-12-21 Thread Jim Thompson
you guys should all run for congress

  _  

From: tony estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:09 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] line tension


James MacLean wrote:
...I have given the auto line tensioner a bit of thoughta bang bang sort
of controllerthe sensor...should be fairly simpleThe controller...a
simple 4 bit micro and a FET or relay to control the winch solenoid
=
Yep, that's what I was thinking, Jim. 

The sensor wouldn't have to be fabricated; sensors are available
commercially from various sources, including:

http://www.tensionmeters.com/elec.htm#MPHB-Series,%20Base%20Mount,%20Three%2
0Tension%20Sensors

The sensor needs to be mounted on a sturdy frame that can be staked down.
That would have to be machined, but it's a simple part. The controller
should allow for integration of the readings over a variable interval, and
should have circuitry to introduce hysteresis so that it pulses the winch
solenoid at a pace that doesn't overload anything. When you think about it,
the electronics aren't complicated.

This could, at least in theory, address lots of issues. If the gadgets
turned out to be not too expensive, it might catch on.