Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] release debug version of test_nua.exe run differently (sofia-sip-1.12.11)
Hi Allen, 2011/3/23 Allen Guan alleng...@gmail.com: I am new to this mail list. I have built sofia-sip-1.12.11 under XP SP3 and tried the test programs. I have noticed strange behaviors of the test program test_nua.exe when running in release version. I have tried to compiled with Visual studio 2003, visual studio 2005 and visual studio 2010 express. All the debug versions of test_nua.exe compiled with these three compilers run well; but the release versions hang in the middle of the running, I have attached the log information got when I ran these programs in verbose mode. Please take a look at it and give me some advices on the possible reasons why these release versions have issues and how to tune them up to make them work. The test_nua has some problems in the way some WinSock implementations route the local TCP/IP traffic. You can try to run it with command line option --no-nat, and see if the problem persists. You could also check if the su_init() manages to load the _DisconnectEx function pointer. I was under the impression that it should work in later XP SPs, too, but it is not first time I have made a mistake. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Version 1.12.11
Hi Jerry, 2011/3/23 Jerry Richards jerry.richa...@teotech.com: I noticed the latest trunk still has the following line in the configure.ac file: AC_INIT([sofia-sip], [1.12.10devel]) Shouldn't this line show 1.12.11? It seems to me that I have actively forgotten about CVS. I committed the release to CVS, too. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Getting started: parsing a message
Hi Bendan, 2011/3/21 Brendan Loudermilk bren...@apwit.com: As a weekend project I've begun to play around with Sofia-SIP. I'm using FFI to build a simple Ruby interface to some of the lower-level functions in the library. My first goal is to be able to parse arbitrary strings from a Ruby networking library. I saw the example on this page for parsing memory, but I'm wondering if theres a simpler way. What kind of strings you want to parse? Something like Contact: sip:192.168.1.2:5060? As a secondary question, what options are there for those of us who are interested in the SIP/SDP protocol behavior implementations, but want to implement our own networking? Are we forced to re-implement the various behavioral RFCs in our implementation? Or is there an event-based hook portion of Sofia that I have yet to discover? I'm a bit loss what you want to do by yourself? Interface towards the sockets and network? Something else? -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Prack
Hi Vikas, 2011/3/18 Vikas Bhat vikasbhat0...@gmail.com: i am implenting early dialog in Sofia sip application using prack. the application is stateless using NTA modul. my application send invite with Supported header,receives 183 with RSeq. then the applcation tries to send the PRACK message as shown below but it fails orq=nta_outgoing_prack(leg, //leg created before sending the invite (nta_outgoing_t *)dialogue-orq, // this is orq of INVITE message send earlier using nta_outgoing_tcreate (nta_response_f *)sofia_sip_response, //call back function for receiving response (nta_outgoing_magic_t*)dialogue, //dialogue pointer that is created after sending initial INVITE NULL, NULL, NTATAG_STATELESS(1), SIPTAG_RACK(pRackHdr), //added rack header TAG_END()); Kindly guide me to implement Prack . If you want to use nta_outgoing_prack(), you first have to create a new instance of INVITE client transaction specific to the new early dialog you want to PRACK with nta_outgoing_tagged(). When you receive an early response with Require: 100rel, you create the new invite transaction with nta_outgoing_tagged(), and keep both it and the original invite transaction around. Depending on your application, you might run to a situation where the final 200 OK is received from some other UA (or you might receive 100rel responses from other UAs, too). There is a disturbing @bug in nta_outgoing_tagged(), however, I believe the leak is fixed, but the PRACK and early dialog code is not very well tested. Please report if you run to any assert() failure. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Good TLS Hellos But No SIP REGISTER Sent
Hi Jerry, 2011/3/22 Jerry Richards jerry.richa...@teotech.com: I am seeing an issue with TLS where the REGISTER message is not getting sent. The TLS Hello/Certificate exchange seems to always happens correctly (which just precedes the REGISTER request). The scenario is that it is previously registered and then later lose registration because of this issue. Interestingly enough, it seems to be timing related, because if I enable all the sofia debug logging in the sofia stack, it does not have this problem. Could this be a timing issue? Any thoughts on how to resolve this? How you manage your TLS connections? Do you have an active connection during the lifetime of the registration? Can you send other requests, like, INVITE after a period of inactivity? -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] soatag_local_sdp_str_ref undeclared ('soa:remove duplicate definitions')
Hi Erik, 2011/3/24 Erik Habicht e.habi...@thiesen.com: Looks like there was a bogus soatag_session_sdp_str_ref declaration instead of soatag_local_sdp_str_ref. Yes ... adding SOFIAPUBVAR tag_typedef_t soatag_local_sdp_str_ref; also solve the problem. Is SOFIAPUBVAR tag_typedef_t soatag_session_sdp_str_ref; needed any more? In my case removing SOFIAPUBVAR tag_typedef_t soatag_session_sdp_str_ref; works. I think I've planned on adding SOATAG_SESSION_SDP() at some point and the duplicate was an abortive attempt on it. Anyways, thanks for spotting this, I've already pushed the patch to gitorious. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Good TLS Hellos But No SIP REGISTER Sent
Hi Pekka, Well, I am using sofia-sip version 1.12.9 and I just noticed there are TLS changes since that version. So I'm going to upgrade to 1.12.11 and see if I have the same issue. Thanks, Jerry -Original Message- From: Pekka Pessi [mailto:ppe...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 6:09 AM To: Jerry Richards Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Good TLS Hellos But No SIP REGISTER Sent Hi Jerry, 2011/3/22 Jerry Richards jerry.richa...@teotech.com: I am seeing an issue with TLS where the REGISTER message is not getting sent. The TLS Hello/Certificate exchange seems to always happens correctly (which just precedes the REGISTER request). The scenario is that it is previously registered and then later lose registration because of this issue. Interestingly enough, it seems to be timing related, because if I enable all the sofia debug logging in the sofia stack, it does not have this problem. Could this be a timing issue? Any thoughts on how to resolve this? How you manage your TLS connections? Do you have an active connection during the lifetime of the registration? Can you send other requests, like, INVITE after a period of inactivity? -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
[Sofia-sip-devel] Anyone still using CVS?
Hello all, Are there a a lot of people still using CVS? As it is now, CVS is not really very useful in tracking the development, nor it is very useful in tracking releases as Jerry noticed. If there is no objections, I'll stop updating the CVS repo and try to remove the links to it from the Sourceforge developer pages. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Anyone still using CVS?
Pekka, I pulled the version using darcs. If you're now using git, what would be the command line to fetch the latest source (using git)? Thanks, Jerry -Original Message- From: Pekka Pessi [mailto:ppe...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:50 AM To: Jerry Richards Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Anyone still using CVS? Hello all, Are there a a lot of people still using CVS? As it is now, CVS is not really very useful in tracking the development, nor it is very useful in tracking releases as Jerry noticed. If there is no objections, I'll stop updating the CVS repo and try to remove the links to it from the Sourceforge developer pages. -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] release debug version of test_nua.exe run differently (sofia-sip-1.12.11)
Hi, Pekka, Thanks a lot for your reply. I have tried the --no-nat setting, the results are the same. Actually the log information I provided in my original email for Visual studio 2003 release version is already the result with BOTH --no-nat AND --no-proxy setting, otherwise it halts even earlier with the following log information: TEST NUA-2.6.1: REGISTER b to c test_nua: testing b_call-nh = nua_handle(b-nua, b_call, (tag_type_t)0, (tag_value_t)0) test_nua: ok: (b_call-nh = nua_handle(b-nua, b_call, (tag_type_t)0, (tag_value_t)0)) nta: REGISTER (10166550): Connection refused (10061) with tcp/[192.168.1.5]:1685 I have test these release version of test_nua.exe on XP SP3, Vista business, and Windows 7 Home Preminum, all all have same results as the log shown in my original email. All these three operation systems have the latest patches installed. I have checked the su_init() function, it's the su_init(void) at the line 304 of su.c, it DOES include the code to load the _DisconnectEx function pointer, and I have checked the log information, the loading function call didn't fail. I am confused why the release version runs differently from debug version, the debug version just passes all the test cases. According to my limited experiences, it might caused by not initializing some varibles before using them since the debug version always set the varibles to zero when they are declared. Would you please give me some more advices to dig into this issue? Thanks! -Allen On 3/24/2011 5:16 AM, Pekka Pessi wrote: Hi Allen, 2011/3/23 Allen Guan alleng...@gmail.com: I am new to this mail list. I have built sofia-sip-1.12.11 under XP SP3 and tried the test programs. I have noticed strange behaviors of the test program test_nua.exe when running in release version. I have tried to compiled with Visual studio 2003, visual studio 2005 and visual studio 2010 express. All the debug versions of test_nua.exe compiled with these three compilers run well; but the release versions hang in the middle of the running, I have attached the log information got when I ran these programs in verbose mode. Please take a look at it and give me some advices on the possible reasons why these release versions have issues and how to tune them up to make them work. The test_nua has some problems in the way some WinSock implementations route the local TCP/IP traffic. You can try to run it with command line option --no-nat, and see if the problem persists. You could also check if the su_init() manages to load the _DisconnectEx function pointer. I was under the impression that it should work in later XP SPs, too, but it is not first time I have made a mistake. -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar ___ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
