Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-11 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On 7/10/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

...Should we remove all author tags for solr code, or only for those who voted 
+1?...


I'd say all author tags, and just in case here's my belated +1 to the
proposal that started this thread.

-Bertrand


Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-10 Thread Yonik Seeley

OK, so it seems there's general agreement to remove author tags.
Should we remove all author tags for solr code, or only for those who voted +1?

Anyone care to whip up a script?

-Yonik


Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Hostetter

: Should we remove all author tags for solr code, or only for those who voted 
+1?

eh.

i say we do it all .. if anyone really wanted to keep their author tags
they would have said something.

: Anyone care to whip up a script?

find -name \*.java -and -not -wholename \*.svn\* | xargs perl -i -ne 'print 
unless /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/'

should i go ahead and commit ... or do people disagree with the remove
all ? ... it's fairly easy to change it it to only remove a single author
line.


-Hoss



Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll

FWIW,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CodeOfConduct  (totally unofficial)  
discourages them as well, but leaves it up to the PMC...  And I  
recall seeing a Nutch or Hadoop email wanting to remove them as well.



On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Bill Au wrote:


+1

Bill

On 7/2/07, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yonik Seeley wrote:
 In the spirit of shared ownership, what do people think of  
getting rid

 of @author tags (for committers or other dev people that consent?).
 Other apache projects have done so, for a host of reasons.

 - some people don't use author tags, hence credit is uneven
 - author tags tend to only credit the original author, and not
 everyone that works on the code after (or does code reviews, lends
 ideas, etc, etc)
 - we have CHANGES.txt to generally credit people (and it prob  
does a

 better job)
you forgot another big reason
people tend to email people in the @author tags directly, instead of
using the lists.






Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-02 Thread Chris Hostetter

: In the spirit of shared ownership, what do people think of getting rid
: of @author tags (for committers or other dev people that consent?).
: Other apache projects have done so, for a host of reasons.

+1

: $ find . -name \*.java | xargs grep '@author'| grep -i hoss | wc
:   2   8 152

wow ... that's 2 more then i expected to see.



-Hoss



Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-02 Thread Ryan McKinley




Thoughts?



+1

It does feel a bit akward.


Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-02 Thread Mike Klaas

On 2-Jul-07, at 11:32 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:


In the spirit of shared ownership, what do people think of getting rid
of @author tags (for committers or other dev people that consent?).
Other apache projects have done so, for a host of reasons.

- some people don't use author tags, hence credit is uneven
- author tags tend to only credit the original author, and not
everyone that works on the code after (or does code reviews, lends
ideas, etc, etc)
- we have CHANGES.txt to generally credit people (and it prob does  
a better job)


I've seen a better list of reasons elsewhere, but my main motivation
was that it didn't feel right having my name spashed all over code
that many other people are contributing to now.

Thoughts?


+0, though I think it is mostly a decision for those who have already  
tons of @author tags in the repo.


FWIW, our internal repository was in a similar situation: I was  
__author__ of 90% of the files, though certainly not the sole  
contributor to all of those files.  I decided to strip this  
attribution for precisely the reasons you enumerated.


-Mike


Re: removing most @author tags

2007-07-02 Thread Ian Holsman

Yonik Seeley wrote:

In the spirit of shared ownership, what do people think of getting rid
of @author tags (for committers or other dev people that consent?).
Other apache projects have done so, for a host of reasons.

- some people don't use author tags, hence credit is uneven
- author tags tend to only credit the original author, and not
everyone that works on the code after (or does code reviews, lends
ideas, etc, etc)
- we have CHANGES.txt to generally credit people (and it prob does a 
better job)

you forgot another big reason
people tend to email people in the @author tags directly, instead of 
using the lists.