fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Hi, I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query +(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site) I would expect the document which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime4/int lst name=params str name=rows10/str str name=start0/str str name=indenton/str str name=q+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=version2.2/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=2 start=0 doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:124/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/oranges/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetorange orange orange/str str name=titleorange/str /doc doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:123/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/me/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetapple apple apple/str str name=titleapple/str /doc /result lst name=debug str name=rawquerystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=querystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=parsedquery+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str str name=parsedquery_toString+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str lst name=explain str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:124,internal_docid=13 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) /str str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:123,internal_docid=14 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: 4.0 = boost 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14) /str /lst /lst /response
how to create a filter factory in solr
Hello there, I want to create an Arabic filter and Arabic filter factory to add in solr jar to use in my application, could u give me any guides on how to do that ?? Thanks in advance
unsubscribe
Re: fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Hmmm, a norm of 0.0??? That implies that the boost for that field (text) was set to zero when it was indexed. How did you index the data (straight HTTP, SolrJ, etc)? What does your schema for this field (and copyFields) look like? -Yonik On 11/1/07, Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query +(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site) I would expect the document which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime4/int lst name=params str name=rows10/str str name=start0/str str name=indenton/str str name=q+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=version2.2/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=2 start=0 doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:124/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/oranges/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetorange orange orange/str str name=titleorange/str /doc doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:123/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/me/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetapple apple apple/str str name=titleapple/str /doc /result lst name=debug str name=rawquerystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=querystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=parsedquery+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str str name=parsedquery_toString+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str lst name=explain str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:124,internal_docid=13 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) /str str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:123,internal_docid=14 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: 4.0 = boost 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14) /str /lst /lst /response
SOLR 1.3: defaultOperator always defaults to OR although AND is specifed.
experimenting with SOLR 1.3 and discovered that although I specified solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/ in schema.xml q=a+b behaves as q=a OR B instead of q=a AND b Obviously this is not correct. I used the nightly of 29 oct. Cheers, Geert-Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1.3%3A-defaultOperator-always-defaults-to-OR-although-AND-is-specifed.-tf4731773.html#a13529997 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SOLR 1.3: defaultOperator always defaults to OR although AND is specifed.
Try the latest... I just fixed this. -Yonik On 11/1/07, Britske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: experimenting with SOLR 1.3 and discovered that although I specified solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/ in schema.xml q=a+b behaves as q=a OR B instead of q=a AND b Obviously this is not correct. I used the nightly of 29 oct. Cheers, Geert-Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1.3%3A-defaultOperator-always-defaults-to-OR-although-AND-is-specifed.-tf4731773.html#a13529997 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Oooh! I think I'll just get my coat... My indexer was defaulting to zero for document boosts rather than 1. On 11/1/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, a norm of 0.0??? That implies that the boost for that field (text) was set to zero when it was indexed. How did you index the data (straight HTTP, SolrJ, etc)? What does your schema for this field (and copyFields) look like? -Yonik On 11/1/07, Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query +(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site) I would expect the document which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime4/int lst name=params str name=rows10/str str name=start0/str str name=indenton/str str name=q+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=debugQueryon/str str name=version2.2/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=2 start=0 doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:124/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/oranges/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetorange orange orange/str str name=titleorange/str /doc doc str name=guidtest_index-test_site-integration:123/str str name=indextest_index/str str name=link/me/str str name=sitetest_site/str str name=snippetapple apple apple/str str name=titleapple/str /doc /result lst name=debug str name=rawquerystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=querystring+(apple^4 orange) +(site:test_site)/str str name=parsedquery+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str str name=parsedquery_toString+(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site/str lst name=explain str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:124,internal_docid=13 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) /str str name=id=test_index-test_site-integration:123,internal_docid=14 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: 4.0 = boost 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14) /str /lst /lst /response
Re: Alphabetical Facets
Will there be a way to do reverse alphabetical ordering in addition to alphabetical? a-z and z-a ? Thanks in advance. ryantxu wrote: Chris Hostetter wrote: : Has anyone given any thought to alphabetical faceting? if by alphabetical you mean the natural unicode ordering of terms for facet.field type facets -- that's already supported. It's the default sort if there is no facet limit (ie: facet.limit=-1) but even with a limit it can be explicitly turned on with facet.sort=false http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#head-569f93fb24ec41b061e37c702203c99d8853d5f1 http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*facet=truefacet.field=catrows=0facet.limit=5facet.sort=false perfect! I read that, but did not realize natural index order is alphabetical in the ascii range. thanks ryan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alphabetical-Facets-tf3728353.html#a13533000 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Getting only size of getFacetCounts , to simulate count(group by( a field) ) using facets
Hi, Not sure what the resolution on this has been. But, I also have this need and I am using 1.2 release of solr. If there is a workaround so I can get this functionality, please advise. It will be very helpful. Thanks. Laurent Hoss wrote: Hi We want to (mis)use facet search to get the number of (unique) field values appearing in a document resultset. I thought facet search perfect for this, because it already gives me all the (unique) field values. But for us to be used for this special problem, we don't want all the values listed in response as there might be over 1 and we don't need the values at all, just the count of how many! I looked at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters and hoped to find a parameter like facet.sizeOnly = true (or facet.showSize=true , combined with facet.limit=1 or other small value) Would you accept a patch with such a feature ? It should probably be relatively easy, though not sure if fits into the concept of facets.. I looked at the code, maybe add an extra Value to returned NamedList of getFacetCounts() in SimpleFacets ?! ps: Other user having same request AFAIU : http://www.nabble.com/showing--range-facet-example-%3D-by-Range-%28-1-to-1000-%29-t3660704.html#a10229069 thanks, Laurent Hoss -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-only-size-of-getFacetCounts-%2C-to-simulate-count%28group-by%28-a-field%29-%29-using-facets-tf4482430.html#a13532933 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Phrase Query Performance Question
On 31-Oct-07, at 11:54 PM, Haishan Chen wrote: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:54:53 -0700 Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr- [EMAIL PROTECTED] hurricane katrina is a very expensive query against a collection focused on Hurricane Katrina. There will be many matches in many documents. If you want to measure worst-case, this is fine. I'd try other things, like: * ninth ward * Ray Nagin * Audubon Park * Canal Street * French Quarter * FEMA mistakes * storm surge * Jackson Square Of course, real query logs are the only real test. wunder These terms are not frequent in my index. I believe they are going to be fast. The thing is that I feel 2 million documents is a small index. 100,000 or 200,000 hits is a small set and should always have sub second query performance. Now I am only querying one field and the response is almost one second. I feel I can't achieve sub second performance if I add a bit more complexity to the query. Many of the category terms in my index will appear in more than 5% of the documents and those category terms are very popular search terms. So the example I gave were not extreme cases for my index I think that you are somewhat misguided about what constitutes a small set. A query term that appears in 5-10% of the index in a natural language corpus is _extremely_ frequent. Not quite on the order of stopwords, but getting there. As a comparison, on an extremely large corpus that I have handy, documents containing both the word 'auto' and 'repair' (not necessarily adjacent) constitute 0.1% of the index. The frequency of the phrase auto repair is 0.025%. @200k docs would be the response rate from an 800million-doc corpus. What data are you indexing, what what is the intended effect of the phrase queries you are performing? Perhaps getting at the issue from this end would be more productive than hammering at the phrasequery performance question. When I start tomcat I saw this message: The Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path Is that mean if I use Apache Tomcat Native library the query performance will be better. Anyone has experience on that? Unlikely, though it might help you slightly at a high query rate with high cache hit ratios. -Mike
Solr-J: automatic url-escaping gives invalid uri exception. How to workaround?
I have a custom requesthandler which does some very basic dynamic parameter
substitution.
dynamic params are params which are enclosed in braces ({}).
So this means i can do something like this:
q={order}...
where {order} is substituted by the name of an existing order-column.
Now this all works well when i supply such a query directly as un url in
firefox / IE.
However when i supply a query through SOLR-J I get an invalid URI
exception as SOLR-J automatically URLEncodes the braces and then passes this
onto Apache-HttpClient, which chokes on the URLEncoded URI.
Is there any way around passing things as braces trough SOLR-J such that the
resulting URL is correctly interprested by HttpClient?
Geert-Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-J%3A-automatic-url-escaping-gives-invalid-uri-exception.-How-to-workaround--tf4733909.html#a13536871
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr-J: automatic url-escaping gives invalid uri exception. How to workaround?
I replaced { and } by (( resp. )). Not ideal (I like braces...) but it
suffices for now.
Still, if someone knows a general solution to the UrlEscaping-issue with
Solr-J i'd love to hear it.
Cheers,
Geert-Jan
Britske wrote:
I have a custom requesthandler which does some very basic dynamic
parameter substitution.
dynamic params are params which are enclosed in braces ({}).
So this means i can do something like this:
q={order}...
where {order} is substituted by the name of an existing order-column.
Now this all works well when i supply such a query directly as un url in
firefox / IE.
However when i supply a query through SOLR-J I get an invalid URI
exception as SOLR-J automatically URLEncodes the braces and then passes
this onto Apache-HttpClient, which chokes on the URLEncoded URI.
Is there any way around passing things as braces trough SOLR-J such that
the resulting URL is correctly interprested by HttpClient?
Geert-Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-J%3A-automatic-url-escaping-gives-invalid-uri-exception.-How-to-workaround--tf4733909.html#a13537284
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: sorting results
: sorry to be a numptie but can someone tell me how I change my results sort : mechanism? : I'm using solr 1.1 and the example solr install from the download. I've check the copy of hte tutorial that is included with your version of Solr ... it describes how to do sorting with teh standard request handler (quick answer: put ; title asc at the end of your q param) if you are using dismax (that was in Solr 1.1 right?) then it's a seperate sort param just like StandardREquestHandler uses right now (ie: q=bob+dolesort=title+asc in either case, you need a field named title which is indexed and can't have multi-values ... which means if you use a TextField it needs to use KeywordTokenizer. fields you search on don't typically work well as sort fields for this reason, but using copyField in your schema can give you one version for searching and one version forsorting. -Hoss
Re: how to create a filter factory in solr
: I want to create an Arabic filter and Arabic filter factory to add in : solr jar to use in my application, could u give me any guides on how to : do that ?? Step one is to create your Filter, this is completley independent of Solr, you can develop directly against the Lucene jar. ... write some unit tests that verify it does what you wnat it to do. Creating a Factory for your Filter is then trivial ... assuming your Filters don't have a lot of constructor options, they can be just a few lines of java code. for info on using them in Solr check out this wiki... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins -Hoss
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
/solr/admin/stats.jps is XML with a stylesheet. It contains stuff like this: stat name=numDocs 266687 /stat wunder On 11/1/07 7:39 PM, Papalagi Pakeha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa
Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter in ubuntu 7.04,tomcat5.5
2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.solr.core.Config getInstanceDir 信息: Using JNDI solr.home: /data/www/tomcat/webapps/solr 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.solr.core.Config setInstanceDir 信息: Solr home set to '/data/www/tomcat/webapps/solr/' 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext filterStart 严重: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init( SolrDispatchFilter.java:74) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:223) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef ( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:304) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.init( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:77) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart( StandardContext.java :3634) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start( StandardContext.java:4217) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal( ContainerBase.java:759) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.access$0 ( ContainerBase.java:743) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$PrivilegedAddChild.run( ContainerBase.java:143) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild ( ContainerBase.java:737) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java :524) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor( HostConfig.java:608) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors ( HostConfig.java:535) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java :470) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java :1122) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent ( HostConfig.java:310) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent( LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java :1021) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java :718) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java :1013) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:442) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start( StandardService.java:450) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java :709) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start (Catalina.java:551) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke ( DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:294) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.commons.daemon.support.DaemonLoader.start( DaemonLoader.java:177) 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start 严重: Error filterStart
How to get number of indexed documents?
Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
does http://.../solr/admin/luke work for you? lst name=index int name=numDocs601818/int ... On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Papalagi Pakeha wrote: Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa -- http://variogr.am/
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
Thanks, that's what I wanted :-) PaPa On 11/2/07, Brian Whitman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: does http://.../solr/admin/luke work for you? lst name=index int name=numDocs601818/int ... On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Papalagi Pakeha wrote: Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa -- http://variogr.am/
