Re: Search for FirstName with first Char uppercase followed by * not giving result; getting result with all lowercase and *
:When i try george* I get results. Whereas George* fetches no results. Wildcard queries are not analyzed by QueryParser.
Re: solr - uima error
I found the issue is in the README.txt as the right class to use is UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorFactory, please change that in your solrconfig. Regards, Tommaso 2011/1/30 Darx Oman darxo...@gmail.com Hi I already copied apache-solr-uima-4.0-SNAPSHOT.jartosolr\lib but what causing the error is this updateRequestProcessorChain name=uima processor class=org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAProcessorFactory/ processor class=solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory / processor class=solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory / /updateRequestProcessorChain this class is not found processor class=org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAProcessorFactory
Re: Http Connection is hanging while deleteByQuery
Hello Ravi Kiran, I am not quite sure if it has anything to do with the number of records. Anyways there are around 400K docs in Solr, and my deleteByQuery() tries to delete about 400 docs.. The thing is, it does seem to delete the records, but the control never seems to come back to the caller. It just hangs. Also that that I did not wait until it threw any exception(lets say an hour) as I felt anyway it should be completed in few minutes. I tried to let it run hoping to see an exception, but for 3-4 hours nothing happened really. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Http-Connection-is-hanging-while-deleteByQuery-tp2367405p2383477.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search for FirstName with first Char uppercase followed by * not giving result; getting result with all lowercase and *
Hi Ahmet, Thanks for the reply. I had attached the Analysis report of the query George* It is found to be split into terms *George** and *George* by the WordDelimiterFilterFactory and the LowerCaseFilterFactory converts it to * george** and *george* When I indexed *George *it was also finally analyzed and stored as *george* Theny why is it that I don't get a match as per the analysis report I had attached in my previous mail. Or Am I missing something basic here? Many Thanks. M On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: :When i try george* I get results. Whereas George* fetches no results. Wildcard queries are not analyzed by QueryParser.
SolrJ (Trunk) Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin' format
Hello list, I build an application that uses SolrJ to communicate with Solr. What did I do? Well, I deleted all the solrj-lib stuff from my application's Webcontent-directory and inserted the solrj-lib from the freshly compiled solr 4.0 - trunk. However, when trying to query Solr 4.0 it shows me a RuntimeException: Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin' format Maybe its interesting: Solr was empty. I do not know how it would look like if there was something inside the index. Any ideas how to fix that problem? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-Trunk-Invalid-version-or-the-data-in-not-in-javabin-format-tp2384421p2384421.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search for FirstName with first Char uppercase followed by * not giving result; getting result with all lowercase and *
Hi Mark, When I indexed *George *it was also finally analyzed and stored as *george* Theny why is it that I don't get a match as per the analysis report I had your indexed term is george but you search for George* which does not go through the same analysis process as it did when it was indexed. So, since the terms you are searching for are not lowercased you are trying to find something that starts with George (capital G) which doesn't exist in you index. If you are not hitting Solr directly, maybe you can lowercase you input text before feeding it to Solr? On 30 January 2011 16:38, Mark Fletcher mark.fletcher2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ahmet, Thanks for the reply. I had attached the Analysis report of the query George* It is found to be split into terms *George** and *George* by the WordDelimiterFilterFactory and the LowerCaseFilterFactory converts it to * george** and *george* When I indexed *George *it was also finally analyzed and stored as *george* Theny why is it that I don't get a match as per the analysis report I had attached in my previous mail. Or Am I missing something basic here? Many Thanks. M On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: :When i try george* I get results. Whereas George* fetches no results. Wildcard queries are not analyzed by QueryParser.
RE: match count per shard and across shards
Brilliant. So obvious. Upayavira On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:53 -0700, Bob Sandiford bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com wrote: Or - you could add a standard field to each shard, populate with a distinct value for each shard, and facet on that field. Then look at the facet counts of the value that corresponds to a shard, and, hey-presto, you're done... Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com www.sirsidynix.com -Original Message- From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 6:52 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: match count per shard and across shards To my knowledge, the distributed search functionality is intended to be transparent, thus no details deriving from it are exposed (e.g. what docs come from which shard), so, no, I don't believe it to be possible. The only way I know right now that you could achieve it is by two (sets of) queries. One would be a distributed search across all shards, and the other would be a single hit to every shard. To fake such a facet, this second set of queries would only need to ask for totals, so it could use a rows=0. Otherwise you'd have to enhance the distributed indexing code to expose some of this information in its response. Upayavira On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 03:48 -0800, csj christiansonnejen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is it possible to construct a Solr query that will return the total number of hits there across all shards, and at the same time getting the number of hits per shard? I was thinking along the lines of a faceted search, but I'm not deep enough into Solr capabilities and query parameters to figure it out. Regards, Christian Sonne Jensen -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/match-count-per-shard-and-across- shards-tp2369627p2369627.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --- Enterprise Search Consultant at Sourcesense UK, Making Sense of Open Source --- Enterprise Search Consultant at Sourcesense UK, Making Sense of Open Source
Re: match count per shard and across shards
Hi, FYI: I figured out a solution my self. I wanted a smart way to get the shard count for a query (how many documents were found in each shard). The smart consisted in having all these counts in just one query using faceting. I was asking if Solr could help with this, e.g. had some smart info for shards, I could facet out of the box. But apparently it does not. But in my situation I can use my knowledge of how the shards are organised. They are organised chronologically, and I happen to know the date boundaries. My solution is simply to facet those boundaries. In this way I can query once and include all known shards and have their count for the search. This may have a performance penalty, but it is at least for now a simple way. Christian Sonne Jensen -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/match-count-per-shard-and-across-shards-tp2369627p2385061.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrJ (Trunk) Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin' format
(11/01/31 3:11), Em wrote:
Hello list,
I build an application that uses SolrJ to communicate with Solr.
What did I do?
Well, I deleted all the solrj-lib stuff from my application's
Webcontent-directory and inserted the solrj-lib from the freshly compiled
solr 4.0 - trunk.
However, when trying to query Solr 4.0 it shows me a
RuntimeException:
Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin' format
I've just committed a small change so that you can see the version difference
(I'll open the JIRA issue later because it is in maintenance now):
Index: solr/src/common/org/apache/solr/common/util/JavaBinCodec.java
===
--- solr/src/common/org/apache/solr/common/util/JavaBinCodec.java
(revision 1065245)
+++ solr/src/common/org/apache/solr/common/util/JavaBinCodec.java
(working copy)
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@
FastInputStream dis = FastInputStream.wrap(is);
version = dis.readByte();
if (version != VERSION) {
- throw new RuntimeException(Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin'
format);
+ throw new RuntimeException(Invalid version (expected + VERSION +
+ , but + version + ) or the data in not in 'javabin' format);
}
return readVal(dis);
}
Can you try the latest trunk and see the version difference?
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: solr - uima error
Thanx Tommaso now solr starts OK. but what really I don't comprehend is how my text get annotated by UIMA because when I started indexing none of the UIMA new fields get data If you please point me to some kind of articles that explain how this thing works...
