Re: solr search speed is so slow.
Hi, I got your private email but will reply in public for everyones benefit. I'm sure you can fine-tune various things in order to gain some ms. But my first and best advice to you is to increase the amount of RAM in your computer. Your computer is very weak and under-specced for use with search. I don't know your application's use and business value, but this looks more like a desktop computer than a production computer, and you cannot really measure performance on anything else than your target production environment. You say your index size is 1.4Gb which will double in future to 2.8Gb. Throw in 8Gb RAM in your server and allocate 2Gb for Java/Solr (-Xmx2g). The remaining 6Gb will be used by Windows and for disk caching your index. This will cause your entire index to be cached in RAM and you're not dependent on your (slow) disk for search. Aside from this, have you profiled what in your search takes the most time? Try to add debugQuery=true and look at the timings section at the bottom of the resonse to see whether it's the query part or perhaps the highlighting part which spends the most time. How large are your PDF docs (text, not binary) on average? Also, newer versions of Solr may have optimizations for faster highlighting.. Another thing from your reqHandler config. You use maxAnalyzedChars=-1. The correct should be hl.maxAnalyzedChars and this will only work for the original highlighter, not fvh. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 10. feb. 2012, at 05:15, Rong Kang wrote: Thanks for your reply. I didn't use any other params except q(for example http://localhost:8080/solr/search?q=drugs). no facet, no sort. I don't think configure newSearcher or firstSearcher can help, because I want every query can be very fast. Do you have other solution? I think 460ms is too slow even though a word is firstly searched. My computer 's setting: cpu: amd 5000, 2.2GHz, 1 cpu with 2 cores. main memory: 2G, 800Mhz disk drive : 7200r/min This is my full search configuration: requestHandler name=/search class=org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=wtxslt/str str name=trdismaxdoc.xsl/str int name=maxAnalyzedChars-1/int str name=echoParamsall/str str name=indentoff/str str name=flfilename/str int name=rows10/int str name=defTypedismax/str str name=qffilename^5.0 text^1.5/str str name=q.alt*:*/str str name=hlon/str str name=hl.flfilename text/str bool name=hl.useFastVectorHighlightertrue/bool str name=hl.tag.pre![CDATA[b style=color:red]]/str str name=hl.tag.post![CDATA[/b]]/str int name=hl.fragsize100/int int name=f.filename.hl.fragsize100/int str name=f.filename.hl.alternateFieldfilename/str int name=f.text.hl.fragsize100/int int name=f.text.hl.snippets3/int /lst /requestHandler and my schema.xml fields field name=text type=text indexed=true multiValued=true termVectors=true termPositions=true termOffsets=true/ field name=filename type=filenametext indexed=true required=true termVectors=true termPositions=true termOffsets=true/ field name=id type=string stored=true/ /fields defaultSearchFieldtext/defaultSearchField uniqueKeyid/uniqueKey copyField source=filename dest=text/ and fieldType name=filenametext class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1 generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter
Re: Setting up logging for a Solr project that isn't in tomcat/webapps/solr
You can unpack your war (jar -xvf solr.war), change logging.properties and then pack it again (jar -cvf solr.war) You can also try to specify a new folder in a lib... tag in solrconfig.xml and put your prop file there. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 11. feb. 2012, at 01:07, Mike O'Leary wrote: I set up a Solr project to run with Tomcat for indexing contents of a database by following a web tutorial that described how to put the project directory anywhere you want and then put a file called projectname.xml in the tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost directory that contains contents like this: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? Context docBase=C:/projects/solr_apps/solr_db/solr.war crossContext=true Environment name=solr/home type=java.lang.String value=C:/projects/solr_apps/solr_db override=true/ /Context I got this working, and now I would like to create a logging.properties file for Solr only, as described in the Apache Solr Reference Guide distributed by Lucid. It says: To change logging settings for Solr only, edit tomcat/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties. You will need to create the classes directory and the logging.properties file. You can set levels from FINEST to SEVERE for a class or an entire package. Here are a couple of examples: org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.level = FINEST org.apache.solr.level = WARNING I think this explanation assumes that the Solr project is in tomcat/webapps/solr. I tried putting a logging.properties file in various locations where I hoped Tomcat would pick it up, but none of them worked. If I have a solr_db.xml file in tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost that points to a Solr project in C:/projects/solr_apps/solr_db (that was created by copying the contents of the apache-solr-3.5.0/example/solr directory to C:/projects/solr_apps/solr_db and going from there), where is the right place to put a Solr only logging.properties file? Thanks, Mike
Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)
dear all,
I update my solr at 3.5 version but now I have this problem:
Grave: Full Import failed
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.getClassLoader()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:424)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.doFullDump(DocBuilder.java:242)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.execute(DocBuilder.java:180)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.doFullImport(DataImporter.java:331)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.runCmd(DataImporter.java:389)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter$1.run(DataImporter.java:370)
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.getClassLoader()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TikaEntityProcessor.firstInit(TikaEntityProcessor.java:72)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorBase.init(EntityProcessorBase.java:59)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorWrapper.init(EntityProcessorWrapper.java:71)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:319)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:383)
... 5 more
feb 11, 2012 12:27:26 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2
rollback
Informazioni: start rollback
feb 11, 2012 12:27:26 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2
rollback
Informazioni: end_rollback
feb 11, 2012 12:27:27 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter
doFullImport
Informazioni: Starting Full Import
feb 11, 2012 12:27:27 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
Informazioni: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={clean=falsecommit=truecommand=full-importqt=/dataimport}
status=0 QTime=0
feb 11, 2012 12:27:27 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.SolrWriter
readIndexerProperties
Avvertenza: Unable to read: dataimport.properties
feb 11, 2012 12:27:28 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter
doFullImport
Grave: Full Import failed
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.getClassLoader()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:424)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.doFullDump(DocBuilder.java:242)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.execute(DocBuilder.java:180)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.doFullImport(DataImporter.java:331)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.runCmd(DataImporter.java:389)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter$1.run(DataImporter.java:370)
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.getClassLoader()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TikaEntityProcessor.firstInit(TikaEntityProcessor.java:72)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorBase.init(EntityProcessorBase.java:59)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorWrapper.init(EntityProcessorWrapper.java:71)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:319)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:383)
... 5 more
feb 11, 2012 12:27:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2
rollback
Informazioni: start rollback
feb 11, 2012 12:27:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2
rollback
Informazioni: end_rollback
I don't know..
suggestions?
best
a.
2012/2/10 Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com
On 10 February 2012 04:15, alessio crisantemi
alessio.crisant...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I would index on solr my pdf files wich includeds on my directory
c:\myfile\
so, I add on my solr/conf directory the file data-config.xml like the
following:
[...]
but this is the result:
[...]
Your Solr URL for dataimport looks a little odd: You seem to be
doing a delta-import. Normally, one would start with a full import:
http://solr-host:port/solr/dataimport?command=full-import
Have you looked in the Solr logs for the cause of the exception?
Please share that with us.
Regards,
Gora
Re: Highlighting stopwords
Koji Sekiguchi wrote (12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote: Let's say I search for spellcheck solr on a website that only contains info about Solr, so solr was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term solr. So fragments won't contain highlights of the term solr. So when a fragment with the highlighted term spellcheck is generated, it would be less confusing for people who don't know how search engines work to also highlight the term solr. So my first test was to have a field with StopFilterFactory and search on that field, while using another field without StopFilterFactory to highlight on. This didn't do the trick. Are you saying that using hl.q parameter on highlight field while using q on the search field that has StopFilter and hl.q doesn't work for you? koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ At first glance using hl.q did the trick. I just have problems when I am using terms with uppercase. Eventhough I use filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ on the highlighted field in both query and index I do get search results, but just no highlights (lowercasing the terms fixes the problem). Can someone confirm whether this is a bug? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-stopwords-tp3681901p3734892.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCloud Replication Question
On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: how'd you resolve this issue? I was basing my guess on seeing JamiesMac.local and jamiesmac in your first cluster state dump - your latest doesn't seem to mismatch like that though. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
Help with MMapDirectoryFactory in 3.5
I am using Solr 3.5.
I noticed in solrconfig.xml:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=${solr.directoryFactory:solr.StandardDirectoryFactory}/
I don't see this parameter taking.. When I set
-Dsolr.directoryFactory=solr.MMapDirectoryFactory
How do I see the setting in the log or in stats.jsp ? I cannot find a place
that indicates it is set or not.
I would assume StandardDirectoryFactory is being used but I do see (when I
set it or NOT set it)
ame: searcher class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher version:
1.0 description: index searcher stats: searcherName : Searcher@71fc3828
main
caching : true
numDocs : 2121163
maxDoc : 2121163
reader :
SolrIndexReader{this=1867ec28,r=ReadOnlyDirectoryReader@1867ec28,refCnt=1,se
gments=1}
readerDir :
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory@C:\solr\jetty\example\solr\providersea
rch\data\index
lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory@45c1cfc1
indexVersion : 1324594650551
openedAt : Sat Feb 11 09:49:31 MST 2012
registeredAt : Sat Feb 11 09:49:31 MST 2012
warmupTime : 0
Also, how do I set unman and what is the purpose of chunk size?
Re: Help with MMapDirectoryFactory in 3.5
Also, does someone have an example of using unmap in 3.5 and chunksize?
From: Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:39:56 -0700
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Help with MMapDirectoryFactory in 3.5
I am using Solr 3.5.
I noticed in solrconfig.xml:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=${solr.directoryFactory:solr.StandardDirectoryFactory}/
I don't see this parameter taking.. When I set
-Dsolr.directoryFactory=solr.MMapDirectoryFactory
How do I see the setting in the log or in stats.jsp ? I cannot find a place
that indicates it is set or not.
I would assume StandardDirectoryFactory is being used but I do see (when I
set it or NOT set it)
ame: searcher class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher version:
1.0 description: index searcher stats: searcherName : Searcher@71fc3828
main
caching : true
numDocs : 2121163
maxDoc : 2121163
reader :
SolrIndexReader{this=1867ec28,r=ReadOnlyDirectoryReader@1867ec28,refCnt=1,se
gments=1}
readerDir :
org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory@C:\solr\jetty\example\solr\providersea
rch\data\index
lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory@45c1cfc1
indexVersion : 1324594650551
openedAt : Sat Feb 11 09:49:31 MST 2012
registeredAt : Sat Feb 11 09:49:31 MST 2012
warmupTime : 0
Also, how do I set unman and what is the purpose of chunk size?
Distributed search: RequestHandler
Hi!
I'm using Solr 3.5. I have two shards. Now I'm using default and my own
defined request handler to search by these shards:
requestHandler name=distributed class=solr.SearchHandler
default=false
lst name=defaults
str name=shards192.168.1.1:8080/solr,192.168.1.2:8080/solr/str
/lst
/requestHandler
So, urls I have:
http://192.168.1.1:8080/solr/select/?q=testrows=0qt=distributed:
{responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:1},response:{numFound:20,start:0,docs:[]}}
http://192.168.1.1:8080/solr/select/?q=testrows=0
{responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:1},response:{numFound:13,start:0,docs:[]}}
http://192.168.1.2:8080/solr/select/?q=testrows=0
{responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:1},response:{numFound:7,start:0,docs:[]}}
Can I configure my solrconfig to use default search handler, for example:
requestHandler name=search class=solr.SearchHandler default=true
lst name=defaults
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
int name=rows10/int
/lst
lst name=appends
str name=qtdistributed/str
/lst
/requestHandler
requestHandler name=standalone class=solr.SearchHandler
default=false /
requestHandler name=distributed class=solr.SearchHandler
default=false
lst name=defaults
str name=shards192.168.1.1:8080/solr,192.168.1.2:8080/solr/str
str name=qtstandalone/str
/lst
/requestHandler
but this unfortunaly don't works :-(
The goal is to use only one core on each server and don't use qt parameter
in request:
http://192.168.1.1:8080/solr/select/?q=testrows=0
{responseHeader:{status:0,QTime:1},response:{numFound:20,start:0,docs:[]}}
P.S. No SolrCloud, only Solr 3.5.
P.P.S. Maybe it can be configured for core at solr.xml file?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distributed-search-RequestHandler-tp3735621p3735621.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCloud Replication Question
I wiped the zk and started over (when I switch networks I get different host names and honestly haven't dug into why). That being said the latest state shows all in sync, why would the cores show up as down? On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: how'd you resolve this issue? I was basing my guess on seeing JamiesMac.local and jamiesmac in your first cluster state dump - your latest doesn't seem to mismatch like that though. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
Re: SolrCloud Replication Question
On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: I wiped the zk and started over (when I switch networks I get different host names and honestly haven't dug into why). That being said the latest state shows all in sync, why would the cores show up as down? If recovery fails X times (say because the leader can't be reached from the replica), a node is marked as down. It can't be active, and technically it has stopped trying to recover (it tries X times and eventually give up until you restart it). Side note, I recently ran into this issue: SOLR-3122 - fix coming soon. Not sure if you have looked at your logs or not, but perhaps it's involved. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
SolrJ + SolrCloud
Hi, Do all the normal facilities of Solr work with SolrCloud from SolrJ? Things like /mlt, /cluster, facets , tvf's, etc. Darren
boost question. need boost to take a query like bq
We like the boost parameter in SOLR 3.5 with eDismax. The question we have is what we would like to replace bq with boost, but we get the multi-valued field issue when we try to do the equivalent queries HTTP ERROR 400 Problem accessing /solr/providersearch/select. Reason: can not use FieldCache on multivalued field: specialties_ids q=*:*bq=multi_field:87^2defType=dismax How do you do this using boost? q=*:*boost=multi_field:87defType=edismax We know we can use bq with edismax, but we like the multiply feature of boost. If I change it to a single valued field I get results, but they are all 1.0. str name=YFFL5 1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of: 1.0 = queryNorm /str q=*:*boost=single_field:87defType=edismax // this works, but I need it on multivalued
FW: boost question. need boost to take a query like bq
I did find a solution, but the output is horrible. Why does explain look so badly? lst name=explainstr name=2H7DF 6.351252 = (MATCH) boost(*:*,query(specialties_ids: #1;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0; ,def=0.0)), product of: 1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of: 1.0 = queryNorm 6.351252 = query(specialties_ids: #1;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0;#0; ,def=0.0)=6.351252 /str defType=edismaxboost=query($param)param=multi_field:87 -- We like the boost parameter in SOLR 3.5 with eDismax. The question we have is what we would like to replace bq with boost, but we get the multi-valued field issue when we try to do the equivalent queries HTTP ERROR 400 Problem accessing /solr/providersearch/select. Reason: can not use FieldCache on multivalued field: specialties_ids q=*:*bq=multi_field:87^2defType=dismax How do you do this using boost? q=*:*boost=multi_field:87defType=edismax We know we can use bq with edismax, but we like the multiply feature of boost. If I change it to a single valued field I get results, but they are all 1.0. str name=YFFL5 1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of: 1.0 = queryNorm /str q=*:*boost=single_field:87defType=edismax // this works, but I need it on multivalued
Re: SolrJ + SolrCloud
On Feb 11, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Darren Govoni wrote: Hi, Do all the normal facilities of Solr work with SolrCloud from SolrJ? Things like /mlt, /cluster, facets , tvf's, etc. Darren SolrJ works the same in SolrCloud mode as it does in non SolrCloud mode - it's fully supported. There is even a new SolrJ client called CloudSolrServer that has built in cluster awareness and load balancing. In terms of what is supported - anything that is supported with distributed search - that is most things, but there is the odd man out - like MLT - looks like an issue is open here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788 but it's not resolved yet. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
Re: Highlighting stopwords
(12/02/11 21:19), O. Klein wrote: Koji Sekiguchi wrote (12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote: Let's say I search for spellcheck solr on a website that only contains info about Solr, so solr was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term solr. So fragments won't contain highlights of the term solr. So when a fragment with the highlighted term spellcheck is generated, it would be less confusing for people who don't know how search engines work to also highlight the term solr. So my first test was to have a field with StopFilterFactory and search on that field, while using another field without StopFilterFactory to highlight on. This didn't do the trick. Are you saying that using hl.q parameter on highlight field while using q on the search field that has StopFilter and hl.q doesn't work for you? koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ At first glance using hl.q did the trick. I just have problems when I am using terms with uppercase. Eventhough I usefilter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ on the highlighted field in both query and index I do get search results, but just no highlights (lowercasing the terms fixes the problem). Can someone confirm whether this is a bug? I don't see your situation. Giving us concrete examples (especially request parameters including q and hl.q) would help a lot! koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: SolrCloud Replication Question
I didn't see anything in the logs, would it be an error? On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: I wiped the zk and started over (when I switch networks I get different host names and honestly haven't dug into why). That being said the latest state shows all in sync, why would the cores show up as down? If recovery fails X times (say because the leader can't be reached from the replica), a node is marked as down. It can't be active, and technically it has stopped trying to recover (it tries X times and eventually give up until you restart it). Side note, I recently ran into this issue: SOLR-3122 - fix coming soon. Not sure if you have looked at your logs or not, but perhaps it's involved. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
Re: SolrCloud Replication Question
Yeah, that is what I would expect - for a node to be marked as down, it either didn't finish starting, or it gave up recovering...either case should be logged. You might try searching for the recover keyword and see if there are any interesting bits around that. Meanwhile, I have dug up a couple issues around recovery and committed fixes to trunk - still playing around... On Feb 11, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: I didn't see anything in the logs, would it be an error? On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: I wiped the zk and started over (when I switch networks I get different host names and honestly haven't dug into why). That being said the latest state shows all in sync, why would the cores show up as down? If recovery fails X times (say because the leader can't be reached from the replica), a node is marked as down. It can't be active, and technically it has stopped trying to recover (it tries X times and eventually give up until you restart it). Side note, I recently ran into this issue: SOLR-3122 - fix coming soon. Not sure if you have looked at your logs or not, but perhaps it's involved. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)
On 2/11/2012 4:33 AM, alessio crisantemi wrote: dear all, I update my solr at 3.5 version but now I have this problem: Grave: Full Import failed org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: The data import handler has always been a contrib module, but it used to be actually included in the .war file. That has been changed, now it's in separate jar files. When you downloaded or compiled 3.5.0, the dist directory should have contained dataimporthandler and dataimporthandler-extras jar files. Mine, which I have compiled myself from the 3.5 svn branch, are named the following: apache-solr-dataimporthandler-3.5-SNAPSHOT.jar apache-solr-dataimporthandler-extras-3.5-SNAPSHOT.jar At minimum, put the first jar file in a lib folder referenced in your solrconfig.xml file. I couldn't tell you whether you'll need the -extras file as well, you'll have to experiment. Thanks, Shawn
