Re: Escaping character at Query
Hi, try with double quotation marks ( ). Carlos. 2013/5/29 Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com I use Solr 4.2.1 and I analyze that keyword: keliledimle at admin page: WT keliledimle SF keliledimle TLCF keliledimle However when I escape that charter and search it: solr/select?q=kelile\dimle here is what I see: response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime148/int lst name=params str name=dimle/ *str name=qkelile\/str* /lst /lst I have edismax as default query parser. How can I escape that character, why it doesn't like that?: str name=qkelile\dimle/str Any ideas?
Re: Escaping character at Query
Hi, I meant: solr/select?q=keliledimle Cheers. 2013/5/29 Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com You need to UUEncode the with %26: ...solr/select?q=kelile%**26dimle Normally, introduces a new URL query parameter in the URL. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Furkan KAMACI Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:55 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Escaping character at Query I use Solr 4.2.1 and I analyze that keyword: keliledimle at admin page: WT keliledimle SF keliledimle TLCF keliledimle However when I escape that charter and search it: solr/select?q=kelile\dimle here is what I see: response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime148/int lst name=params str name=dimle/ *str name=qkelile\/str* /lst /lst I have edismax as default query parser. How can I escape that character, why it doesn't like that?: str name=qkelile\dimle/str Any ideas?
Re: Facet pivot 50.000.000 different values
In case anyone is interested, I solved my problem using the grouping feature: *query* -- filter query (if any) *field* -- field that you want to count (in my case field B) SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery(query); solrQuery.add(group, true); solrQuery.add(group.field, B); // Group by the field solrQuery.add(group.ngroups, true); solrQuery.setRows(0); And in the response *getNGroups()* will give you the total number of distinct values (total number of B distinct values) Cheers, Carlos. 2013/5/18 Carlos Bonilla carlosbonill...@gmail.com Hi Mikhail, yes the thing is that I need to take into account different queries and that's why I can't use the Terms Component. Cheers. 2013/5/17 Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Carlos Bonilla carlosbonill...@gmail.comwrote: We only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1 document but it takes ages Carlos, It's not clear whether you need to take results of a query into account or just gather statistics from index. if later you can just enumerate terms and watch into TermsEnum.docFreq() . Am I getting it right? -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics http://www.griddynamics.com mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
Re: solr starting time takes too long
Hi Lisheng, I had the same problem when I enabled the autoSoftCommit in solrconfig.xml. If you have it enabled, disabling it could fix your problem, Cheers. Carlos. 2013/5/22 Zhang, Lisheng lisheng.zh...@broadvision.com Hi, We are using solr 3.6.1, our application has many cores (more than 1K), the problem is that solr starting took a long time (10m). Examing log file and code we found that for each core we loaded many resources, but in our app, we are sure we are always using the same solrconfig.xml and schema.xml for all cores. While we can config schema.xml to be shared, we cannot share SolrConfig object. But looking inside SolrConfig code, we donot use any of the cache. Could we somehow change config (or source code) to share resource between cores to reduce solr starting time? Thanks very much for helps, Lisheng
Re: Facet pivot 50.000.000 different values
Hi Mikhail, yes the thing is that I need to take into account different queries and that's why I can't use the Terms Component. Cheers. 2013/5/17 Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Carlos Bonilla carlosbonill...@gmail.comwrote: We only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1 document but it takes ages Carlos, It's not clear whether you need to take results of a query into account or just gather statistics from index. if later you can just enumerate terms and watch into TermsEnum.docFreq() . Am I getting it right? -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics http://www.griddynamics.com mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
Facet pivot 50.000.000 different values
Hi, To calculate some stats we are using a field B with 50.000. different values as facet pivot in a schema that contains 200.000.000 documents. We only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1 document but it takes ages Is there any other better way/configuration to do this? Configuration: Solr 4.2.1 JVM Java 7 Max Java Heap size : 12Gb 8 GB RAM Dual Core Many thanks.
Re: Facet pivot 50.000.000 different values
Sorry, 16 GB RAM (not 8). 2013/5/17 Carlos Bonilla carlosbonill...@gmail.com Hi, To calculate some stats we are using a field B with 50.000. different values as facet pivot in a schema that contains 200.000.000 documents. We only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1 document but it takes ages Is there any other better way/configuration to do this? Configuration: Solr 4.2.1 JVM Java 7 Max Java Heap size : 12Gb 8 GB RAM Dual Core Many thanks.
Re: Facet which takes sum of a field into account for result values
Hi, have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent. Regards, Carlos. 2013/5/8 ld luzange...@gmail.com Within MySQL it is possible to get the Top N results while summing a particular column in the database. For example: SELECT ip_address, SUM(ip_count) AS count FROM table GROUP BY ip_address ORDER BY count DESC LIMIT 5 This will return the top 5 ip_address based on the sum of ip_count. Is there a way to have a Facet query within Solr do the same? In other words, count an entry as if there were 'ip_count entries', not just one? I have used the Stats component and faceting but this gives me all the records, there is no way to limit to the top 10 sums. My data set may have millions of records with much variation on IP address so this wouldn’t work. I have also considered adding ip_count number of entries when writing to solr but this causes some issues with the unique ID shared with legacy code that still uses MySQL. Any help is appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-which-takes-sum-of-a-field-into-account-for-result-values-tp4061588.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
