Different queries for same meaning searches
Hello, here is my index and index analyzer configuration: charFilter class=solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory pattern=’|' replacement= / tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ Search for d Osona and d’Osona creates d and osona tokens. But ParsedQuery is different: #1 d Osona +(( DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d | search_title:d)) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:osona | search_title:osona)) )~2) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d osona | search_title:d osona^3.0)) #2 d’Osona +DisjunctionMaxQuery(( (search_definitions:d search_definitions:osona) | (search_title:d search_title:osona) )) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d osona | search_title:d osona^3.0)) And the results are different as well. Where I can find explanation for this? -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas
Re: Different queries for same meaning searches
Yes, the mm is 100%. Thank you for a detailed answer. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 21/08/12 15:21, Jack Krupansky wrote: Solr doesn't actually know any natural language, so it has no way of assessing whether two token streams have the same meaning. In your case, the surface forms/syntax are subtly different - two separate terms vs. a single source term with embedded punctuation. It appears that you are probbaly using the edismax query parser and probably have mm set to 100% or q.op set to AND (the ~2 indicates a BooleanQuery with minMatch of 2 terms.) mm of 100% is equivalent to the AND operator, some/most of the time. For the second query you have a split-term which is treated as a single term/token until the fieldType analyzer splits it into two terms and then does an OR of the sub-terms. Unfortunately, mm and q.op are not passed down to the analyzer, so you have no way of changing that OR to an AND - this is why you get different results. But what you can do is set autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true on your field type(s) to cause the query parser to generate a phrase query for q osona rather than the OR. That's not the same as AND, but depending on your application it may be sufficient or even preferable. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Dalius Sidlauskas Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:35 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Different queries for same meaning searches Hello, here is my index and index analyzer configuration: charFilter class=solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory pattern=’|' replacement= / tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ Search for d Osona and d’Osona creates d and osona tokens. But ParsedQuery is different: #1 d Osona +(( DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d | search_title:d)) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:osona | search_title:osona)) )~2) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d osona | search_title:d osona^3.0)) #2 d’Osona +DisjunctionMaxQuery(( (search_definitions:d search_definitions:osona) | (search_title:d search_title:osona) )) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:d osona | search_title:d osona^3.0)) And the results are different as well. Where I can find explanation for this?
Debug Query returns different debug explanation output for documents
(termFreq(search_dc_title:jaume)=1) 7.6105256 = idf(docFreq=584, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_dc_title, doc=8120) 0.46420816 = (MATCH) weight(search_title:jaume in 8120), product of: 0.122290425 = queryWeight(search_title:jaume), product of: 7.591897 = idf(docFreq=595, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 3.7959485 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_title:jaume in 8120), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_title:jaume)=1) 7.591897 = idf(docFreq=595, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=8120) 3.698813 = (MATCH) max of: 3.698813 = (MATCH) weight(search_dc_title:destorrent^3.0 in 8120), product of: 0.5978991 = queryWeight(search_dc_title:destorrent^3.0), product of: 3.0 = boost 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 6.18635 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_dc_title:destorrent in 8120), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_dc_title:destorrent)=1) 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_dc_title, doc=8120) 1.2329376 = (MATCH) weight(search_title:destorrent in 8120), product of: 0.1992997 = queryWeight(search_title:destorrent), product of: 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 6.18635 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_title:destorrent in 8120), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_title:destorrent)=1) 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=8120) 0.5152115 = (MATCH) max of: 0.019129172 = (MATCH) weight(search_full_definitions:i in 8120), product of: 0.041998293 = queryWeight(search_full_definitions:i), product of: 2.607291 = idf(docFreq=87102, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 0.455475 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_full_definitions:i in 8120), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(search_full_definitions:i)=5) 2.607291 = idf(docFreq=87102, maxDocs=434581) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(field=search_full_definitions, doc=8120) 0.5152115 = (MATCH) weight(search_dc_title:i^3.0 in 8120), product of: 0.22314619 = queryWeight(search_dc_title:i^3.0), product of: 3.0 = boost 4.617704 = idf(docFreq=11665, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 2.308852 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_dc_title:i in 8120), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_dc_title:i)=1) 4.617704 = idf(docFreq=11665, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_dc_title, doc=8120) 0.1702569 = (MATCH) weight(search_title:i in 8120), product of: 0.074060805 = queryWeight(search_title:i), product of: 4.5977597 = idf(docFreq=11900, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 2.2988799 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_title:i in 8120), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_title:i)=1) 4.5977597 = idf(docFreq=11900, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=8120) 0.75 = coord(3/4) Can anyone explain what happens here? Thank you in advance! -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas
Re: Debug Query returns different debug explanation output for documents
Does these settings somehow are involved into this? str name=defTypeedismax/str str name=mm2lt;-25%/str Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 09/07/12 11:23, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: Hello, I have a query that returns different debug explanation output for some reason. First document has no (MATCH) product of: that others have and makes it as a first results that should not be. Here is my debug explain output: Doc #1 4.2649355 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.035260722 = (MATCH) max of: 0.035260722 = (MATCH) weight(search_full_definitions:jaume in 5265), product of: 0.09532936 = queryWeight(search_full_definitions:jaume), product of: 5.9181304 = idf(docFreq=3177, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 0.36988315 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_full_definitions:jaume in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_full_definitions:jaume)=1) 5.9181304 = idf(docFreq=3177, maxDocs=434581) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(field=search_full_definitions, doc=5265) 3.698813 = (MATCH) max of: 0.122653306 = (MATCH) weight(search_full_definitions:destorrent in 5265), product of: 0.17779547 = queryWeight(search_full_definitions:destorrent), product of: 11.037699 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 0.6898562 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_full_definitions:destorrent in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_full_definitions:destorrent)=1) 11.037699 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=434581) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(field=search_full_definitions, doc=5265) 3.698813 = (MATCH) weight(search_dc_title:destorrent^3.0 in 5265), product of: 0.5978991 = queryWeight(search_dc_title:destorrent^3.0), product of: 3.0 = boost 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 6.18635 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_dc_title:destorrent in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_dc_title:destorrent)=1) 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_dc_title, doc=5265) 1.2329376 = (MATCH) weight(search_title:destorrent in 5265), product of: 0.1992997 = queryWeight(search_title:destorrent), product of: 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 6.18635 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_title:destorrent in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_title:destorrent)=1) 12.3727 = idf(docFreq=4, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=5265) 0.5152115 = (MATCH) max of: 0.020531582 = (MATCH) weight(search_full_definitions:i in 5265), product of: 0.041998293 = queryWeight(search_full_definitions:i), product of: 2.607291 = idf(docFreq=87102, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 0.48886704 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_full_definitions:i in 5265), product of: 3.0 = tf(termFreq(search_full_definitions:i)=9) 2.607291 = idf(docFreq=87102, maxDocs=434581) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(field=search_full_definitions, doc=5265) 0.5152115 = (MATCH) weight(search_dc_title:i^3.0 in 5265), product of: 0.22314619 = queryWeight(search_dc_title:i^3.0), product of: 3.0 = boost 4.617704 = idf(docFreq=11665, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 2.308852 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_dc_title:i in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_dc_title:i)=1) 4.617704 = idf(docFreq=11665, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_dc_title, doc=5265) 0.1702569 = (MATCH) weight(search_title:i in 5265), product of: 0.074060805 = queryWeight(search_title:i), product of: 4.5977597 = idf(docFreq=11900, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 2.2988799 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_title:i in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_title:i)=1) 4.5977597 = idf(docFreq=11900, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=5265) 0.015650144 = (MATCH) max of: 0.015650144 = (MATCH) product of: 0.031300288 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.031300288 = (MATCH) weight(search_full_definitions:casa in 5265), product of: 0.08981632 = queryWeight(search_full_definitions:casa), product of: 5.5758758 = idf(docFreq=4474, maxDocs=434581) 0.01610802 = queryNorm 0.34849223 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(search_full_definitions:casa in 5265), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(search_full_definitions:casa)=1) 5.5758758 = idf(docFreq=4474, maxDocs=434581) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(field=search_full_definitions, doc=5265) 0.5 = coord(1/2) Doc #2 4.210119 = (MATCH) product of: 5.6134915 = (MATCH) sum of: 1.3994671 = (MATCH) max of: 1.3994671 = (MATCH) weight(search_dc_title:jaume^3.0 in 8120), product of: 0.36777148 = queryWeight(search_dc_title:jaume^3.0), product of: 3.0
Re: Hi
Hi, I don't think this is the right place for this question. You should follow samples of solr client api integration in Java and develop your way in konakart.. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 10/02/12 08:25, sumal wrote: My self I am Sumal who working as a Software Engineer. Currently I am developing web based e-commerce applications using java and i am using e commerce Konakart shopping cart as well. I am using Konakart community edition. I am kindly requesting some information about how to integrate solr in my konakart If not can you send me some sample application which is using this solr search engine... some application mans small jsp page that functioning to search using solr... Thank you! Best Regards, -Sumal Wattegedara-
Re: Wildcard ? issue?
It seams it is applicable for Solr 3.6 and 4.0. Mines version is 3.5 Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 17:26, Ahmet Arslan wrote: I have already tried this and it did not helped because it does not highlight matches if wild-card is used. The field configuration turns data to: This writeup should explain your scenario : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
Re: Wildcard ? issue?
Okay, I get it, 3.6 is not released yet. Thanks for help fellas! Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 09/02/12 10:19, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: It seams it is applicable for Solr 3.6 and 4.0. Mines version is 3.5 Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 17:26, Ahmet Arslan wrote: I have already tried this and it did not helped because it does not highlight matches if wild-card is used. The field configuration turns data to: This writeup should explain your scenario : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
Wildcard ? issue?
Sorry for inaccurate title. I have a 3 fields (dc_title, dc_title_unicode, dc_unicode_full) containing same value: title xmlns=http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0;cal.lígraf/title and these fields are configured accordingly: fieldType name=xml class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=xml_unicode class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=xml_unicode_full class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType And finally my search configuration: requestHandler name=dictionary class=solr.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=echoParamsall/str str name=defTypeedismax/str str name=mm2lt;-25%/str str name=qfdc_title_unicode_full^2 dc_title_unicode^2 dc_title/str int name=rows10/int str name=spellcheck.onlyMorePopulartrue/str str name=spellcheck.extendedResultsfalse/str str name=spellcheck.count1/str /lst arr name=last-components strspellcheck/str /arr /requestHandler I am trying to match the field with various search phrases (that are valid). There are results: # search phrase match? Comment 1 cal.lígra? yes 2 cal.ligra? no Changed í to i 3 cal.ligraf yes 4 calligra? no The problem is the #2 attempt to match a data. The #3 works replacing ? with f. One more thing. If * is used insted of ? other data is matched as cal.lígrafia but not cal.lígraf... Also I have spotted some logic missmatch in debug parsedQuery field: * cal·lígraf:* +DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*calligraf*^2.0 | dc_title_unicode:cal·lígraf^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígraf^3.0)) *cal·lígra?:*+DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*cal·lígra?*^2.0 | dc_title_unicode:cal·lígra?^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígra?^3.0)) Should the second be *calligra?* insted?* *Environment: Tomcat 7.0.25 (request encoding UTF-8) Solr 3.5.0 Java 7 Oracle Ubuntu 11.10 -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas
Re: Wildcard ? issue?
If you can not read this mail easily check this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3106 This is a copy. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 15:44, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: Sorry for inaccurate title. I have a 3 fields (dc_title, dc_title_unicode, dc_unicode_full) containing same value: title xmlns=http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0;cal.lígraf/title and these fields are configured accordingly: fieldType name=xml class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=xml_unicode class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType fieldType name=xml_unicode_full class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/ tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType And finally my search configuration: requestHandler name=dictionary class=solr.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=echoParamsall/str str name=defTypeedismax/str str name=mm2lt;-25%/str str name=qfdc_title_unicode_full^2 dc_title_unicode^2 dc_title/str int name=rows10/int str name=spellcheck.onlyMorePopulartrue/str str name=spellcheck.extendedResultsfalse/str str name=spellcheck.count1/str /lst arr name=last-components strspellcheck/str /arr /requestHandler I am trying to match the field with various search phrases (that are valid). There are results: # search phrase match? Comment 1 cal.lígra? yes 2 cal.ligra? no Changed í to i 3 cal.ligraf yes 4 calligra? no The problem is the #2 attempt to match a data. The #3 works replacing ? with f. One more thing. If * is used insted of ? other data is matched as cal.lígrafia but not cal.lígraf... Also I have spotted some logic missmatch in debug parsedQuery field: * cal·lígraf:* +DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*calligraf*^2.0 | dc_title_unicode:cal·lígraf^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígraf^3.0)) *cal·lígra?:*+DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*cal·lígra?*^2.0 | dc_title_unicode:cal·lígra?^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígra?^3.0)) Should the second be *calligra?* insted?* *Environment: Tomcat 7.0.25 (request encoding UTF-8) Solr 3.5.0 Java 7 Oracle Ubuntu 11.10
Re: Wildcard ? issue?
I have already tried this and it did not helped because it does not
highlight matches if wild-card is used. The field configuration turns
data to:
dc_title: calligraf
dc_title_unicode: cal·lígraf
dc_title_unicode_full: cal·lígraf
Debug parsedquery says:
[Search for *cal·ligraf*]
+DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*calligraf* |
dc_title_unicode:cal·ligraf^2.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·ligraf^2.0))
[Search for *cal·ligra?*]
+DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*cal·ligra?* |
dc_title_unicode:cal·ligra?^2.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·ligra?^2.0))
Why the *dc_title* field is handled differently? The analysis looks fine:
Index Analyzer
org.apache.solr.analysis.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory
{luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34}
textcal·lígraf
org.apache.solr.analysis.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory
{replacement=, pattern=-, maxBlockChars=1,
luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34, blockDelimiters=}
textcal·lígraf
org.apache.solr.analysis.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
{luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34}
position1
term text cal·lígraf
startOffset 43
endOffset 53
org.apache.solr.analysis.ICUFoldingFilterFactory
{luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34}
position1
term text calligraf
startOffset 43
endOffset 53
Query Analyzer
org.apache.solr.analysis.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
{luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34}
position1
term text cal·ligra?
startOffset 0
endOffset 10
org.apache.solr.analysis.ICUFoldingFilterFactory
{luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34}
position1
term text calligra?
startOffset 0
endOffset 10
Is this a Solr or Lucene bug?
Regards!
Dalius Sidlauskas
On 08/02/12 16:03, Sethi, Parampreet wrote:
Hi Dalius,
If not already tried, Check http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp
(enable verbose output for both Field Value index and query for details)
for your queries and see what all filters/tokenizers are being applied.
Hope it helps!
-param
On 2/8/12 10:48 AM, Dalius Sidlauskasdalius.sidlaus...@semantico.com
wrote:
If you can not read this mail easily check this ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3106 This is a copy.
Regards!
Dalius Sidlauskas
On 08/02/12 15:44, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote:
Sorry for inaccurate title.
I have a 3 fields (dc_title, dc_title_unicode, dc_unicode_full)
containing same value:
title xmlns=http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0;cal.lígraf/title
and these fields are configured accordingly:
fieldType name=xml class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/
/analyzer
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory/
/analyzer
/fieldType
fieldType name=xml_unicode class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
/fieldType
fieldType name=xml_unicode_full class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
/fieldType
And finally my search configuration:
requestHandler name=dictionary class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=echoParamsall/str
str name=defTypeedismax/str
str name=mm2lt;-25%/str
str name=qfdc_title_unicode_full^2 dc_title_unicode^2 dc_title/str
int name=rows10/int
str name=spellcheck.onlyMorePopulartrue/str
str name=spellcheck.extendedResultsfalse/str
str name=spellcheck.count1/str
/lst
arr name=last-components
strspellcheck/str
/arr
/requestHandler
I am trying to match the field with various search phrases (that are
valid). There are results:
# search phrase match? Comment
1 cal.lígra? yes
2 cal.ligra? no Changed í to i
3 cal.ligraf yes
4 calligra? no
The problem is the #2 attempt to match a data. The #3 works replacing
? with f.
One more thing. If * is used insted of ? other data is matched as
cal.lígrafia but not cal.lígraf...
Also I have spotted some logic missmatch in debug parsedQuery field:
*
cal·lígraf:* +DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*calligraf*^2.0 |
dc_title_unicode:cal·lígraf^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígraf^3.0))
*cal·lígra?:*+DisjunctionMaxQuery((dc_title:*cal·lígra?*^2.0 |
dc_title_unicode:cal·lígra?^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígra?^3.0))
Should the second be *calligra?* insted?*
*Environment:
Tomcat 7.0.25 (request encoding UTF-8)
Solr 3.5.0
Java 7 Oracle
Ubuntu 11.10
