Help with Nested Query
Hi,
Im trying to do somethinglike this in Solr 1.4.1
fq=category_id:(24 79)
However the values inside the parenthesis will be fetched through another
query, so far I’ve tried using _query_ but it doesnt work the way I want it
to. Here is what im trying
fq=category_id:(_query_:”{!lucene fl=category_id} video”)
any suggestions on this?
thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Help-with-Nested-Query-tp2811038p2811038.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Highlighting approach.
Hi all, Im looking into solr's highlighting component, as far as I understood, solr's response.getHighlighting() gives back formatted string along with id, then we have to loop through the searched documents and search for id and then replace the formatted string. This approach will seriously slow things up because of looping. Is this the only way to use highlighting component or is my understanding not correct? Im using solr 1.4 Thanks in advance Hasnain. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-approach-tp2288552p2288552.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Removing deleted terms from spellchecker index
Hi, I have configured spellchecker in solrconfig.xml and it is working fine for existing terms. However, if i delete a term, it is still being returned as a suggestion from the spellchecker, even though the term is not being returned if i search the main index. Can anyone guide me as to what could be going wrong? Regards, Taimur -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Removing-deleted-terms-from-spellchecker-index-tp2161624p2161624.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Removing deleted terms from spellchecker index
Hi guys, Thankyou for the answers, now it is working properly. I have just one concern about this approch, we are already committing after every add/delete operation. Can I substitude this with only optimize command? and how would this effect our performance? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Removing-deleted-terms-from-spellchecker-index-tp2161624p2162100.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: spellcheck
Hi, Im facing the same problem, did anyone find a solution? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spellcheck-tp506116p2140923.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Item catagorization problem.
Hi all, I am using solr in my web application for search purposes. However, i am having a problem with the default behaviour of the solr search. From my understanding, if i query for a keyword, let's say Laptop, preference is given to result rows having more occurences of the search keyword Laptop in the field name. This, however, is producing undesirable scenarios, for example: 1. I index an item A with name value Sony Laptop. 2. I index another item B with name value: Laptop bags for laptops. 3. I search for the keyword Laptop According to the default behaviour, precedence would be given to item B since the keyword appears more times in the name field for that item. In my schema, i have another field by the name of Category and, for example's sake, let's assume that my application supports only two categories: computers and accessories. Now, what i require is a mechanism to assign correct categories to the items during item indexing so that this field can be used to better filter the search results, item A would belong to Computer category and item B would belong to Accessories category. So then, searching for Laptop would only look for items in the Computers category and return item A only. I would like to point out here that setting the category field manually is not an option since the data might be in the vicinity of thousands of records. I am not asking for an in-depth algorithm. Just a high level design would be sufficient to set me in the right direction. thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Item-catagorization-problem-tp2136415p2136415.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Item precedence search problem
Hi all, I am using solr in my web application for search purposes. However, i am having a problem with the default behaviour of the solr search. From my understanding, if i query for a keyword, let's say Laptop, preference is given to result rows having more occurences of the search keyword Laptop in the field name. This, however, is producing undesirable scenarios, for example: 1. I index an item A with name value Sony Laptop. 2. I index another item B with name value: Laptop bags for laptops. 3. I search for the keyword Laptop According to the default behaviour, precedence would be given to item B since the keyword appears more times in the name field for that item. Also we donot have anything in the catagory field with which we can catagorize. Can anyone suggest a better approach to sort potential search results? Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Item-precedence-search-problem-tp2130419p2130419.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Item precedence search problem
Hi, First of all thanks for replying. Secondly, maybe i wasn't clear enough in my original post regarding what was required and what has been implemented. In my schema, i have another field by the name of Category and, for example's sake, let's assume that my application supports only two categories: computers and accessories. Now, what i require is a mechanism to assign correct categories to the items during item indexing so that this field can be used to better filter the search results. Continuing from the example in my original post, item A would belong to Computer category and item B would belong to Accessories category. So then, searching for Laptop would only look for items in the Computers category and return item A only. I would like to point out here that setting the category field manually is not an option since the data might be in the vicinity of thousands of records. I am not asking for an in-depth algorithm. Just a high level design would be sufficient to set me in the right direction. thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Item-precedence-search-problem-tp2130419p2130593.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Searching with Number fields
Hi, Im having trouble with searching with number fields, if this field has alphanumerics then search is working perfect but not with all numbers, can anyone suggest me solution??? fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=index_synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=false/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-with-Number-fields-tp1737513p1737513.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Prioritizing advectives in solr search
Hi Otis, Thank you for replying, unfortunately Im unable to fully grasp what you are trying to say, can you please elaborate what is payload with adjective terms? also Im using stopwords.txt to stop adjectives, adverbs and verbs, now when I search for Blue hammers, solr searches for blue hammers and hammers but not blue, but the problem here is user can also search for just Blue, then it wont search for anything... any suggestions on this?? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Prioritizing-adjectives-in-solr-search-tp1613029p1629725.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Prioritizing advectives in solr search
Hi, My question is related to search results giving less importance to adjectives, here is my scenario, im using dismax handler and my understanding is when I query Blue hammer, solr brings me results for blue hammer, blue and hammer, and in the same hierarchy, which is understandable, is there any way I can manage the blue keyword, so that solr searches for blue hammer and hammer and not any results for blue. my handler is as follows... requestHandler name=standard2 class=solr.SearchHandler !-- default values for query parameters -- lst name=defaults str name=defTypedismax/str str name=echoParamsexplicit/str str name=tie0.6/str str name=pfname^2.3 mat_nr^0.4/str str name=mm0%/str any suggestion on this?? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Prioritizing-advectives-in-solr-search-tp1613029p1613029.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
The real problem was this tag !-- field for the QueryParser to use when an explicit fieldname is absent -- defaultSearchFieldtext/defaultSearchField and I was quering like this q=r-1* instead of q=mat_nr:r-1* so whatever fieldType I use for mat_nr, it was using text fieldType which had WordDelimiterFilterFactory, hence I had to put space inorder to get it running. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1437584.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
Hi Erik, So I took your advice and started fresh with solr, got my self latest copy of solr and started adding things gradually in configuration files. Unfortunately, this still doesnot work. But, I realized that searching for q=r-1* didnt return any results but when I query like this q=r-(space)1*, solr returned perfect results. when ever there is start of digits I have to put space before first digit and it works perfect like dcp123* doesnot return no results but dcp(space)123* works perfectly. Im using standard request handler and same type i.e. textShoaib and Im absolutely sure im using the same schema. Im sensing im very close to accomplish my task, any idea why solr is behaving like that. Is there anything I can do to get rid of this (space) issue before digits? thanks Erick Erickson wrote: All I can say is that I just tried it with the following definitions and it works as expected. That is: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=eoe:R-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=eoe:R-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onreturns nothing (casing issue) and http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=eoe:r-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onhttp://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=eoe:R-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=eoe:R-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onreturned 3 documents fieldType name=textShoaib class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ just playing filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType and field name=eoe type=textShoaib indexed=true / where the relevant documents had the following: field name=eoeR-1 and some stuff/field field name=eoer-1 really now/field field name=eoeR-1/field searching for r* and r-* also returned three documents. Note that using StandardAnalyzer and WhitespaceAnalyzer didn't make any difference. browsing the schema from the admin page shows the tokena r-1 really some stuff now Are you totally and absolutely sure that you're using the schema you think you are? And you restarted SOLR after you made schema changes? And you re-indexed your data? I also tried it with the dismax query, and it works there too: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?qt=standard2q=r-1*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=true returns 3 results, where standard2 is defined like this: requestHandler name=standard2 class=solr.SearchHandler !-- default values for query parameters -- lst name=defaults str name=defTypedismax/str str name=echoParamsexplicit/str str name=tie0.6/str str name=qfeoe^2.3 mat_nr^0.4/str str name=mm0%/str !-- int name=rows10/int str name=fl*/str str name=version2.1/str -- /lst So in sum, I suspect that you've made some innocous-seeming change somewhere that you've forgotten about (easy to do when you're trying a zillion things and frustrated). So, here's what I'd recommend: back up and forget dismax for a while, just get it all working with the normal query parser and gradually add things back in until you either fail succeed all the way back to dismax. BTW, you probably want to specify dismax with the qf parameter, pf stands for phrase fields where qf stands for query fields. pf worked for me, but I doubt that's what you're really after. This is all on SOLR 1.4.1 BTW. Best Erick On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Hasnain hasn...@hotmail.com wrote: Erick, I have checked with lowercasing, and yes there are Items by this name. Im not getting anywhere with this, tried many things and Im really perplexed. any other suggestion? Oh dear. Wildcard queries aren't analyzed, so I suspect it's a casing issue. Try two things: 1 search for r-1* 2 look in your index and be sure the actual terms are there as you expect. HTH Erick -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1405431.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1427565.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
Finally got it working, thanks for your help and support -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1429315.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
Erick, I have checked with lowercasing, and yes there are Items by this name. Im not getting anywhere with this, tried many things and Im really perplexed. any other suggestion? Oh dear. Wildcard queries aren't analyzed, so I suspect it's a casing issue. Try two things: 1 search for r-1* 2 look in your index and be sure the actual terms are there as you expect. HTH Erick -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1405431.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.StopFilterFactory {words=stopwords.txt,
ignoreCase=true, enablePositionIncrements=true}
term position 1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.WordDelimiterFilterFactory {splitOnCaseChange=1,
generateNumberParts=1, catenateWords=1, generateWordParts=1, catenateAll=0,
catenateNumbers=1}
term position 1 2
term text R 1110
term type wordword
source start,end0,1 2,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.LowerCaseFilterFactory {}
term position 1 2
term text r 1110
term type wordword
source start,end0,1 2,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
{protected=protwords.txt}
term position 1 2
term text r 1110
term type wordword
source start,end0,1 2,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory {}
term position 1 2
term text r 1110
term type wordword
source start,end0,1 2,6
payload
also after removing wordDelimiterFilterFactory,solr admin looks like this
Index Analyzer
org.apache.solr.analysis.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory {}
term position 1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.StopFilterFactory {words=stopwords.txt,
ignoreCase=true, enablePositionIncrements=true}
term position 1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
{protected=protwords.txt}
term position 1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory {}
term position 1
term text R-1110
term type word
source start,end0,6
payload
any suggestions?
thankyou
Erick Erickson wrote:
Really look at the analysis page in solr admin for how your
analyzer chain handles things, or you'll spend time until you're
really old having trouble :).
Here's what I see on a quick scan:
StandardTokenizer tries to, among other things, preserve
email addresses. The kinds of strings you're working with may
trip something up here.
Remove WordDelimiterFactory altogether. The point of WDF
is to break words apart at transitions.
Remove EnglishPorterFilterFactory too. What the effect
of applying an algorithmic stemming process to words like
you're interested in is...er...not obvious.
All that said, I took a quick at the analysis page with your definition
and nothing jumped out at me. Are you sure that:
you're getting to the request handler you think? What does adding
debugQuery=on show?
you've indexed the data after you've made the changes you outlined above?
The SOLR
admin page can help here, especially the [full interface] link, with debug
info on.
If nothing shows up, can you post the results of debugQuery=on?
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Hasnain hasn...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have gone through all the of the related posts, but could not find a
proper
answer that works, so Im writing this post
Is there anyway of using wilcard searches on alphanumeric text
like...R-1*
?
let me share relevent information
fieldType name=textShoaib class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ !--This was
originally tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ just
playing
around--
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory
ignoreCase=true
words=stopwords.txt
enablePositionIncrements=true
/
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
generateWordParts=0 generateNumberParts=0 catenateWords=0
catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0
preserveOriginal=1/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
protected=protwords.txt/
filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/
/analyzer
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
!--This was originally tokenizer
class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/--
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt
ignoreCase=true expand=true/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true
words=stopwords.txt/
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
generateWordParts=0 generateNumberParts=0 catenateWords=0
catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0
preserveOriginal=1/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory
protected=protwords.txt
Alphanumeric wildcard search problem
I have gone through all the of the related posts, but could not find a proper answer that works, so Im writing this post Is there anyway of using wilcard searches on alphanumeric text like...R-1* ? let me share relevent information fieldType name=textShoaib class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ !--This was originally tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ just playing around-- filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt enablePositionIncrements=true / filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=0 generateNumberParts=0 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0 preserveOriginal=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/ !--This was originally tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/-- filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=true/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=0 generateNumberParts=0 catenateWords=0 catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0 splitOnCaseChange=0 preserveOriginal=1/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.EnglishPorterFilterFactory protected=protwords.txt/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType my requestHandler is... requestHandler name=standard2 class=solr.SearchHandler !-- default values for query parameters -- lst name=defaults str name=defTypedismax/str str name=echoParamsexplicit/str str name=tie0.6/str str name=pfname^2.3 mat_nr^0.4/str str name=mm0%/str !-- int name=rows10/int str name=fl*/str str name=version2.1/str -- /lst /requestHandler and also the field on which I want to apply searching on field name=mat_nr type=textShoaib indexed=true stored=true omitNorms=true/ and the query Im using is qt=standard2q=R-1* but this still doesnt work. any suggestions on this? thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Alphanumeric-wildcard-search-problem-tp1393332p1393332.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search Results optimization
also my request handler looks like this requestHandler name=mb_artists class=solr.SearchHandler lst name=defaults str name=defTypedismax/str str name=qfname ^2.4/str str name=tie0.1/str /lst /requestHandler I really need some help on this, again, what I want is...if I search for swingline red stapler, In results, docs that have all three keywords should come on top, then docs that have any 2 keywords and then docs with 1 keyword, i mean in my sorted order. thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-Results-optimization-tp1129374p1385572.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search Results optimization
Thank you so much for valuable suggestions this is the query im using q=swingline red stapler hammer hand rigidfl=nameqt=standard1rows=35debugQuery=true here is my output, as you can see close to last records, Swingline Stapler scored more than Swingline Red Stapler - 747 series, but I want later one to score more.. I have already added omitNorms=true and omitTermFreqAndPositions=true to the name field. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? - response - lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime32/int - lst name=params str name=debugQuerytrue/str str name=flname/str str name=qswingline red stapler hammer hand rigid/str str name=qtstandard1/str str name=rows35/str /lst /lst - result name=response numFound=3917 start=0 - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Commerical Hand Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameEden Swingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameEden Swingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Stapler/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc - doc str name=nameSwingline Red Stapler - 747 series/str /doc /result - lst name=debug str name=rawquerystringswingline red stapler hammer hand rigid/str str name=querystringswingline red stapler hammer hand rigid/str str name=parsedquerytext:swinglin text:red text:stapler text:hammer text:hand text:rigid/str str name=parsedquery_toStringtext:swinglin text:red text:stapler text:hammer text:hand text:rigid/str - lst name=explain str name=148|A3232.9710014 = (MATCH) product of: 3.9420028 = (MATCH) sum of: 1.65061 = (MATCH) weight(text:swinglin in 40464), product of: 0.45916086 = queryWeight(text:swinglin), product of: 7.1896806 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=137041) 0.06386387 = queryNorm 3.5948403 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:swinglin in 40464), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(text:swinglin)=1) 7.1896806 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=137041) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=40464) 1.5231261 = (MATCH) weight(text:stapler in 40464), product of: 0.4410731 = queryWeight(text:stapler), product of: 6.906457 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=137041) 0.06386387 = queryNorm 3.4532285 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:stapler in 40464), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(text:stapler)=1) 6.906457 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=137041) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=40464) 0.76826674 = (MATCH) weight(text:hand in 40464), product of: 0.31325546 = queryWeight(text:hand), product of: 4.9050493 = idf(docFreq=2759, maxDocs=137041) 0.06386387 = queryNorm 2.4525247 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:hand in 40464), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(text:hand)=1) 4.9050493 = idf(docFreq=2759, maxDocs=137041) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=40464) 0.5 = coord(3/6)/str str name=152|A3232.9710014 = (MATCH) product of: 3.9420028 = (MATCH) sum of: 1.65061 = (MATCH) weight(text:swinglin in 40468), product of: 0.45916086 = queryWeight(text:swinglin), product of: 7.1896806 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=137041) 0.06386387 = queryNorm 3.5948403 = (MATCH)
Re: Search Results optimization
perhaps i wasnt clear in my earlier post if user searches for swingline red stapler hammer hand rigid, then documents that matches max number of words written in query should come first e.g a document with name field as swingline stapler should come later than the document with swingline red stapler any suggestions how to achieve this functionality? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-Results-optimization-tp1129374p1359916.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Search Results optimization
Hi All, My question is related to search results, I want to customize my query so that for query stapler hammer, I should get results for all items containing word stapler first and then results containing hammer, right now results are mixing up, I want them sorted, i.e. all results of stapler on top and hammer on bottom not mixed, I havent changed any configuration files... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-Results-optimization-tp1129374p1129374.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search Results optimization
Thank you for quick response I've tried using boosting and used the query q=stapler^100 hammer ^0, but it is still mixing up the results, am I doing it wrong? also, if I have items named as Swingline red stapler and Arm hammer, how would I know when querying that swingline red stapler is one item and Arm hammer is another one, how would I approach to make a query that shows results from one item on top and another on bottomplz guide. thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-Results-optimization-tp1129374p1137816.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Search Results optimization
im sorry, query q=stapler^100 hammer ^0 is working fine, but I still need guidance with my second question. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-Results-optimization-tp1129374p1138110.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
