solrj and multiple slaves
Hey guys, I have a quick question about using solrj to connect to multiple slaves. My application is deployed on multiple boxes that have to talk to multiple solr slaves. In order to take advantage of the queryResult cache, each request from one of my app boxes should be redirected to the same solr slave. I'm using an apache to load balance between the slaves using sticky sessions with jk2 (jsessionId cookie). Is this the right way to go about loadbalancing multiple solr slaves when using solrj? If so, should I look into making a patch for solrj so that each query can optionally take a cookie parameter so the underling HttpClient knows what jsessionId to attach to the request? On the other hand.. I could be going about this all wrong. Thanks, Dave
RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query
Hi Otis! Yes, I've run the query though debugQuery=yes. I posted the difference between the debug output and the Luke parsed query in my original post. here's a snippet: Also, I've noticed that the parsed query on luke is: text:美聯 聯社 and in solr it is: text:美聯 聯社 I noticed there is an extra space in the solr parsed query. I don't know if that makes a difference. Like I said, the space in there is the only difference between my parsed query in Luke and the debug query output . I even stepped though the response in solr with eclipse, and confirmed that the parsed query was tokenenized properly (bigram), but had that extra space in there. On the analysis page, I see hits come up in the text fine, but nothing on a search from the main page. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:51 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question about bi-gram analysis on query Dave, Have you tried using debugQuery=true ? :) Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: Keene, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Teruhiko Kurosaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:44:59 PM Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query Hi, Thanks for responding. I should have been clearer.. By actual search I meant hitting the search demo page on the solr admin page. So I get no results on this query: /solr/select/?q=%E7%BE%8E%E8%81%AFversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on But the same query (with the data in my index) on the analysis page shows me a hit (and the same search in Luke gets me a hit too). I've tried this on 1.1, 1.2 and nightly as of yesterday. I assume that I am missing something really obvious.. -Dave -Original Message- From: Teruhiko Kurosaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:44 PM To: Keene, David Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query Hello David, And if I do a search in Luke and the solr analysis page for美聯, I get a hit. But on the actual search, I don't. I think you need to tell us what you mean by actual search and your code that interfaces with Solr. -kuro
RE: Merging Fields
Jae, The easiest way to do this is with CopyField. These entries in your schema will accomplish that: field name=field3 type=String indexed=true stored=false multiValued=true/ copyField source=field1 dest=field3/ copyField source=field2 dest=field3/ Field 3 will have the tokens from both field 1 and 2 in it. If you want to merge those 2 fields for display, I would just concat them at display time. Dave -Original Message- From: Jae Joo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:22 AM To: solr-user Subject: Merging Fields Is there any way to merge fields during indexing time. I have field1 and field2 and would like to combine these fields and make field3. In the document, there are field1 and field2, and I may build field3 using CopyField. Thanks, Jae
RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query
Hi, Thanks for responding. I should have been clearer.. By actual search I meant hitting the search demo page on the solr admin page. So I get no results on this query: /solr/select/?q=%E7%BE%8E%E8%81%AFversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on But the same query (with the data in my index) on the analysis page shows me a hit (and the same search in Luke gets me a hit too). I've tried this on 1.1, 1.2 and nightly as of yesterday. I assume that I am missing something really obvious.. -Dave -Original Message- From: Teruhiko Kurosaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:44 PM To: Keene, David Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query Hello David, And if I do a search in Luke and the solr analysis page for美聯, I get a hit. But on the actual search, I don't. I think you need to tell us what you mean by actual search and your code that interfaces with Solr. -kuro
question about bi-gram analysis on query
Hey guys, I'm trying to index a field in Chinese using the CJKTokenizer, and I'm finding that my searches on the index are not working at all. The index is created properly (looking with Luke), and when I search against it with Luke the data comes back as I would expect. Also, when I use the analysis page of solr admin, the result is what I would expect. On an actual search though, nothing is found. Here are the relevant snippets from my confs: fieldtype name=text_zh class=solr.TextField analyzer tokenizer class=org.apache.solr.analysis.ja.CJKTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.TrimFilterFactory / /analyzer /fieldtype ... field name=text type=text_zh indexed=true stored=false multiValued=true/ So if I send in 美聯社 it correctly creates 2 tokens 美聯 聯社 And if I do a search in Luke and the solr analysis page for美聯, I get a hit. But on the actual search, I don't. Also, I've noticed that the parsed query on luke is: text:美聯 聯社 and in solr it is: text:美聯 聯社 I noticed there is an extra space in the solr parsed query. I don't know if that makes a difference. I'm really at a loss. Does anyone know why I don’t get search hits back? Thanks, Dave Keene
