Re: Solr Negative query
try Field1:Val1 AND (*:* NOT Field2:Val2), that shoud work ok On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Viswa S svis...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear Solr/Lucene gurus, I have run into a weird issue trying use a negative condition in my query. Parser:StandardQueryParserMy Query: Field1:Val1 NOT Field2:Val2Resolved as: Field1:Val1 -Field2:Val2 The above query never returns any document, no matter how we use a paranthesis. I did see some suggestions on LuceneQParser to use something like:*:* Field1:Val1 -Field2:Val2 This seems to return some documents, however it seems to ignore the first condition (Field1:Val1), Please help. ThanksVis
Job offer / Oferta de trabajo - Madrid, Spain
Hello, not sure if i should really send this kind of stuff to the list, but since i guess it's only positive and someone might be interested... The company i work at is looking for people with experience with SolR/Lucene. Below, the offer: http://www.infojobs.net/pozuelo-de-alarcon/programador-solr/of-icbca57230549aab73e4b484023657f cheers, Hola, no estoy seguro que deberia enviar este tipo de cosa a la lista, pero como imagino que a alguien le podra venir bien... La empresa en la que trabajo esta buscando gente con experiencia en SolR/Lucene. Sigue la oferta abajo: http://www.infojobs.net/pozuelo-de-alarcon/programador-solr/of-icbca57230549aab73e4b484023657f saludos, Leonardo Menezes
Re: solr connection question
jarrlll On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Óscar Marín Miró oscarmarinm...@gmail.comwrote: xD On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Alejandro Gonzalez alejandrogonzalezd...@gmail.com wrote: ok please don't forget it :) 2010/7/8 Ruben Abad rua...@gmail.com Jorl, ok tendré que modificar mi petición de vacaciones :( Rubén Abad rua...@gmail.com On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS g.zarogki...@multirama.gr wrote: Hi solr users I need to know how solr manages the connections when we make a request(select update commit) Is there any connection pooling or an article to learn about it connection management?? How can I log in a file the connections solr server I have setup my solr 1.4 with tomcat Thanks in advance -- Whether it's science, technology, personal experience, true love, astrology, or gut feelings, each of us has confidence in something that we will never fully comprehend. --Roy H. William
Re: steps to improve search
most likely due to: EnglishPorterFilterFactory RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory StopFilterFactory you get those fake matches. try going into the admin, on the analysis section. in there you can simulate the index/search of a document, and see how its actually searched/indexed. it will give you some clues... On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Frederico Azeiteiro frederico.azeite...@cision.com wrote: For the example given, I need the full expression paying for it, so yes all the words. -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Sent: sexta-feira, 2 de Julho de 2010 12:30 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: steps to improve search I need to know how to achieve more accurates queries (like the example below...) using these filters. do you want that all terms - you search - must appear in returned documents? You can change default operator of QueryParser to AND. either in schema.xml or appending q.op=AND you your search url. I am assuming you are not using dismax.
Re: Storing RandomSortField
Hey, for random sorting, random values are generated in runtime using the seed you passed as one of the parameters to generate the value, among other things. this way, if the value you use as seed is the same in different request, the sorting order should be the same. you could also, for debbuing purposes, edit the random sort field class and put some traces in there, so it could print the id of the document and the value generated for example. but the values wont be stored on the idx. cheers On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Marco Martinez mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com wrote: Hi Alexandre, I am not totally sure about this, but the random sort field its only used to do a random sort on your searchs, and you will to pass differents values to have differents sorts, so this only applies in the searchs, so no value is indexed. You will find more information here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/18 Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com Hi guys, Is there any way to mak a RandomSortField be stored? I'm trying to do it for debugging purposes, My intention is to take a look at the values that are stored there to determine the sorting that is being applied to the results. I tried to make it a stored field as: field name=randomorder type=random stored=true / And also tried to create another text field, copying the result from the random field like this: field name=randomorderdebug type=text indexed=true stored=true/ copyField source=randomorder dest=randomorderdebug/ Neither of the approaches worked. Is there any restriction on this kind of field that prevents it from being displayed in the results? Thanks, Alexandre
Re: Challenge: Searching for variant products and get basic products in result set
would you then need to know in which variant was your match produced? because if not, you can just index the whole thing as one single document... On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, hkmortensen ko...@yahoo.com wrote: I do searching for products. Each base product exist in variants as well. One variant has a glass door, another a steel door etc. The variants can have diffent prices. The base product does not really exist, only the variants exists IRL. The case corresponds to cars: the car model is the base product, with color variants or with automatic/manual etc. I want to search for variants, but I only want to have base products in the result. Ie when one or more variants from the same base product are found, only the base product shall be in the search result. Does somebody have an idea how this could be done? Best regards Henning -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Challenge-Searching-for-variant-products-and-get-basic-products-in-result-set-tp829218p829218.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Challenge: Searching for variant products and get basic products in result set
if that is so, and maybe, you have for example, two variants of cars with automatic, what would define on which one was the hit? or field dont share common information across variants? if they do share, you wouldnt be able to define in which one was the hit(because it was on both of them) and would either have to pick one randomly, or retrieve both. if they dont share that info, you would have that covered, since only one would match any given query. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, hkmortensen ko...@yahoo.com wrote: thanks. Currently not, but requirements change all the time as always ;-) If we get a requirement, that a facet shall be material of doors, we will need to know which variant was the hit. I would like to be prepared for that. Leonardo Menezes wrote: would you then need to know in which variant was your match produced? because if not, you can just index the whole thing as one single document... On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, hkmortensen ko...@yahoo.com wrote: I do searching for products. Each base product exist in variants as well. One variant has a glass door, another a steel door etc. The variants can have diffent prices. The base product does not really exist, only the variants exists IRL. The case corresponds to cars: the car model is the base product, with color variants or with automatic/manual etc. I want to search for variants, but I only want to have base products in the result. Ie when one or more variants from the same base product are found, only the base product shall be in the search result. Does somebody have an idea how this could be done? Best regards Henning -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Challenge-Searching-for-variant-products-and-get-basic-products-in-result-set-tp829218p829218.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Challenge-Searching-for-variant-products-and-get-basic-products-in-result-set-tp829218p829319.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Wildcars in Queries
Yes, also you can use '?' for a single character wild card. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Robert Naczinski robert.naczin...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, i'm new to solr. Can I use wilcard like '*' in my queries? Thanx, Robert
Re: Wildcars in Queries
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Robert Naczinski robert.naczin...@googlemail.com wrote: How I can do that? I that distribute example I'cant use wildcards ;-( 2010/5/17 Leonardo Menezes leonardo.menez...@googlemail.com: Yes, also you can use '?' for a single character wild card. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Robert Naczinski robert.naczin...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, i'm new to solr. Can I use wilcard like '*' in my queries? Thanx, Robert
Re: Facet Queries
Hey, there´s plenty of documentation about that... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Field_Value_Faceting_Parameters On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, whn i use facet queries, whats the default size of the results returned? how do we configure if we want all the results shown? Regards Raakhi
