RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

2017-04-24 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi Alessandro,

Can you please suggest what should be the correct order of adding processors ?

I am having 5 collections, 6 shards, replication factor 2, 3 nodes on 3 
separate VMs.

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

-Original Message-
From: alessandro.benedetti [mailto:a.benede...@sease.io]
Sent: 21 April 2017 13:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from 
this updateRequestProcessorChain

Let's make a quick differentiation between PRE and POST processors in a Solr 
Cloud atchitecture :

 "In a single node, stand-alone Solr, each update is run through all the update 
processors in a chain exactly once. But the behavior of update request 
processors in SolrCloud deserves special consideration. " cit. wiki

*PRE PROCESSORS*
All the processors defined BEFORE the distributedUpdateProcessor happen ONLY on 
the first node that receive the update ( regardless if it is a leader or a 
replica ).

*POST PROCESSORS*
The distributedUpdateProcessor will forward the update request to the the 
correct leader ( or multiple leaders if the request involves more shards), the 
leader will then forward to the replicas.
The leaders and replicas at this point will execute all the update request 
processors defined AFTER the distributedUpdateProcessor.

" Pre-processors and Atomic Updates
Because DistributedUpdateProcessor is responsible for processing Atomic Updates 
into full documents on the leader node, this means that pre-processors which 
are executed only on the forwarding nodes can only operate on the partial 
document. If you have a processor which must process a full document then the 
only choice is to specify it as a post-processor."
wiki

In your example, your chain is definitely messed up, the order is important and 
you want your heavy processing to happen only on the first node.

For better info and clarification:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode ( you can find 
here a working alternative to your chain) 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Update+Request+Processors



-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory-was-explicitly-disabled-from-this-updateRequestProcessorChain-tp4319154p4331215.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.


RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

2017-04-19 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi Ishan,

After making suggested changes to solrconfig.xml, I did upconfig on all 3 SOLR 
VMs and restarted SOLR engines.

But still I am facing same issue. Is it something I am missing ?

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

-Original Message-
From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 April 2017 02:12
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from 
this updateRequestProcessorChain

Why are you adding these update processors (esp. the
AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor) after DistributedUpdateProcessor? Try adding 
them before DUP, and it has a better chance to work.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Pratik Thaker < 
pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am facing this issue since very long, can you please provide your
> suggestion on it ?
>
> Regards,
> Pratik Thaker
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Pratik Thaker [mailto:pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com]
> Sent: 09 February 2017 21:24
> To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled
> from this updateRequestProcessorChain
>
> Hi Friends,
>
> Can you please try to give me some details about below issue ?
>
> Regards,
> Pratik Thaker
>
> From: Pratik Thaker
> Sent: 07 February 2017 17:12
> To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled
> from this updateRequestProcessorChain
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am using SOLR Cloud 6.0
>
> I am receiving below exception very frequently in solr logs,
>
> o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
> RunUpdateProcessor has received an AddUpdateCommand containing a
> document that appears to still contain Atomic document update
> operations, most likely because DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was
> explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(
> RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:63)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor
> Factory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(
> AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:335)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcess
> orFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:74)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.
> doLocalAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:936)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.
> versionAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1091)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.
> processAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:714)
> at org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.
> processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProc
> essorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(
> AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:93)
> at org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(
> JavabinLoader.java:97)
>
> Can you please 

RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

2017-04-12 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi All,

I am facing this issue since very long, can you please provide your suggestion 
on it ?

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

-Original Message-
From: Pratik Thaker [mailto:pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com]
Sent: 09 February 2017 21:24
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from 
this updateRequestProcessorChain

Hi Friends,

Can you please try to give me some details about below issue ?

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

From: Pratik Thaker
Sent: 07 February 2017 17:12
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this 
updateRequestProcessorChain

Hi All,

I am using SOLR Cloud 6.0

I am receiving below exception very frequently in solr logs,

o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: 
RunUpdateProcessor has received an AddUpdateCommand containing a document that 
appears to still contain Atomic document update operations, most likely because 
DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this 
updateRequestProcessorChain
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:63)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:335)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:74)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.doLocalAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:936)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.versionAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1091)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.processAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:714)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:97)

Can you please help me with the root cause ? Below is the snapshot of 
solrconfig,






   


  [^\w-\.]
  _





  
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd'T'HH:mmZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd HH:mmZ
-MM-dd HH:mm
-MM-dd
  


  strings
  
java.lang.Boolean
booleans
  
  
java.util.Date
tdates
  
  
java.lang.Long
java.lang.Integer
tlongs
  
  
java.lang.Number
tdoubles
  


  

Regards,
Pratik Thaker


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you

RE: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

2017-02-09 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi Friends,

Can you please try to give me some details about below issue ?

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

From: Pratik Thaker
Sent: 07 February 2017 17:12
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this 
updateRequestProcessorChain

Hi All,

I am using SOLR Cloud 6.0

I am receiving below exception very frequently in solr logs,

o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: 
RunUpdateProcessor has received an AddUpdateCommand containing a document that 
appears to still contain Atomic document update operations, most likely because 
DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this 
updateRequestProcessorChain
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:63)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:335)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:74)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.doLocalAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:936)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.versionAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1091)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.processAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:714)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:97)

Can you please help me with the root cause ? Below is the snapshot of 
solrconfig,






   


  [^\w-\.]
  _





  
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd'T'HH:mmZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd HH:mmZ
-MM-dd HH:mm
-MM-dd
  


  strings
  
java.lang.Boolean
booleans
  
  
java.util.Date
tdates
  
  
java.lang.Long
java.lang.Integer
tlongs
  
  
java.lang.Number
tdoubles
  


  

Regards,
Pratik Thaker


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.


DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this updateRequestProcessorChain

2017-02-07 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi All,

I am using SOLR Cloud 6.0

I am receiving below exception very frequently in solr logs,

o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: 
RunUpdateProcessor has received an AddUpdateCommand containing a document that 
appears to still contain Atomic document update operations, most likely because 
DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory was explicitly disabled from this 
updateRequestProcessorChain
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:63)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory$AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory.java:335)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory$1.processAdd(FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory.java:74)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.processAdd(FieldMutatingUpdateProcessor.java:117)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.doLocalAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:936)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.versionAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:1091)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor.processAdd(DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:714)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processAdd(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:48)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory$DefaultValueUpdateProcessor.processAdd(AbstractDefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JavabinLoader$1.update(JavabinLoader.java:97)

Can you please help me with the root cause ? Below is the snapshot of 
solrconfig,






   


  [^\w-\.]
  _





  
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd'T'HH:mmZ
-MM-dd'T'HH:mm
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSSZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSS
-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ
-MM-dd HH:mm:ss
-MM-dd HH:mmZ
-MM-dd HH:mm
-MM-dd
  


  strings
  
java.lang.Boolean
booleans
  
  
java.util.Date
tdates
  
  
java.lang.Long
java.lang.Integer
tlongs
  
  
java.lang.Number
tdoubles
  


  

Regards,
Pratik Thaker


The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.


Should I Use Solr

2015-03-12 Thread Pratik Thaker
Hi,

I am using Oracle 11g2 and we are having a schema where few tables are having 
more than 100 million rows (some of them are Varchar2 100 bytes). And we have 
to frequently do the LIKE based search on those tables. Sometimes we need to 
join the tables also. Insert / Updates are also happening very frequently for 
such tables (1000 insert / updates per second) by other applications.

So my question is, for my User Interface, should I use Apache Solr to let user 
search on these tables instead of SQL queries? I have tried SQL and it is 
really slow (considering amount of data I am having in my database).

My requirements are,

Result should come faster and it should be accurate.
It should have the latest data.
Can you suggest if I should go with Apache Solr, or another solution for my 
problem ?

Regards,
Pratik Thaker

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.