Re: Slight issue with classloading and DataImportHandler
Hi, Are you using DataImportHandler in a production environment ? When it will be available in the nightly builds ? Thanks, William. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We plan to use SolrResourceLoader (in the next patch) . That is the best way to go. But we still prefer the usage of DIH package classes without any prefix. type=HttpDataSource instead of type=solr.HttpDataSource But users must be able to load their classes using the solr.classname format --Noble On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : aah!. We always assumed that people put the custom jars in the : WEB-INF/lib folder of solr webapp and hence they are automatically in : the classpath we shall make the necessary changes . It would be better to use the classloader from the SolrResourceLoader ... that should be safe for anyone with any setup. DIH does not load class using the SolrResourceLoader. It tries a Class.forName() with the name you provide if it fails it prepends org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport. and retries. ... The reason for doing so is that we do not use any of the 'solr.' packages in DIH. All our implementations fall into the default package and we can directly use them w/o the package name. FWIW: there isn't relaly a solr. package ... solr. can be used as an short form alias for the likely package when Solr resolves classes, where the likely package varies by context and there can be multiple options that it tries in order DIH could do the same thing, letting short form solr. signify that Transformers, Evaluators, etc are in the o.a.s.handler.dataimport package. the advantage of this over what it sounds like DIH currently does is that if there is an o.a.s.handler.dataimport.WizWatTransformer but someone wants to write their own (package less) WizWatTransformer they can and refer to it simply as WizWatTransformer (whereas to use the one that ships with DIH they would specify solr.WizWatTransformer). There's no ambiguity as to which one someone means unless they create a package called solr ... but then they'ed just be looking for trouble :) -Hoss -- --Noble Paul
Re: SOLR X FAST
:) Ok, ok. I don´t think that this kind of investment($$$) so incredibly hilarious :) Maybe I could ask Why use Solr and not use FAST ?. It is a really big diference :) But I think you are correct. Sorry . William. On Dec 13, 2007 3:28 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example. : What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ? Am I the only one that finds these questions incredibly hilarious? particularly on this list? You should also email FAST customer service and ask them Why use Solr and not use FAST ? :) -Hoss
Re: SOLR X FAST
Hi, Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example. What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ? I would like a matrix comparing both. Thanks, William. On Dec 11, 2007 8:15 PM, Matthew Runo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it all depends, what do you want out of Solr or FAST? Thanks! Matthew Runo Software Developer 702.943.7833 On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, William Silva wrote: Hi, How is the best way to compare SOLR and FAST Search ? Thanks, William.
Related Search
Hi, What is the best way to implement a related search like CNET with SOLR ? Ex.: Searching for tv the related searches are: lcd tv, lcd, hdtv, vizio, plasma tv, panasonic, gps, plasma Thanks, William.
Re: PriceJunkie.com using solr!
Hi Nick, For example, searching for tv , the first document is *Samsung SlimFit HDTV TX-T2782 27 TV* in 2 Sellers, Amazon and Circuit City. The tvs name are: Amazon = Slimfit Digital Tv 27 Circuit City = Samsung 27 SlimFit Tube TV How do you know that they are the same Television ? Thanks, William. On 11/14/07, Nick Jenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi This is faceting, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview -Nick On Nov 14, 2007 1:21 AM, William Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mike, I´m checking out www.pricejunkie.com and Í would like to know how do you group the products and find the price range. Is it a batch process ? Are you using MoreLikeThis to do it ? Thanks, William. ahait is wonderful. 2007/5/24, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just one. -Original Message- From: James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: PriceJunkie.com using solr! how many solr instance? 2007/5/17, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Congrats, very nice job! It's fast too. -Yonik On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've been using it for a while now and I have recently brought one of my side projects online. I have several other projects that will be using solr for it's search and facets. Please check out www.pricejunkie.com and let us know what you think.. You can give feedback and/or sign up on the mailing list for future updates. The site is very basic right now and many new and useful features plus merchants and product categories will be coming soon! I thought it would be a good idea to at least have a few people use it to get some feedback early and often. Some of the nice things behind the scenes that we did with solr: - created custom request handlers that have category to facet to attribute caching built in - category to facet management - ability to manage facet groups (attributes within a set facet) and assign them to categories - ability to create any category structure and share facet groups - facet inheritance for any category (a facet group can be defined on a parent category and pushed down to all children) - ability to create sub-categories as facets instead of normal sub categories - simple xml configuration for the final outputted category configuration file I'm sure there are more cool things but that is all for now. Join the mailing list to see more improvements in the future. Also.. how do I get added to the Using Solr wiki page? Thanks, Mike Austin
Re: PriceJunkie.com using solr!
Hi Mike, I´m checking out www.pricejunkie.com and Í would like to know how do you group the products and find the price range. Is it a batch process ? Are you using MoreLikeThis to do it ? Thanks, William. ahait is wonderful. 2007/5/24, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just one. -Original Message- From: James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:30 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: PriceJunkie.com using solr! how many solr instance? 2007/5/17, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Congrats, very nice job! It's fast too. -Yonik On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've been using it for a while now and I have recently brought one of my side projects online. I have several other projects that will be using solr for it's search and facets. Please check out www.pricejunkie.com and let us know what you think.. You can give feedback and/or sign up on the mailing list for future updates. The site is very basic right now and many new and useful features plus merchants and product categories will be coming soon! I thought it would be a good idea to at least have a few people use it to get some feedback early and often. Some of the nice things behind the scenes that we did with solr: - created custom request handlers that have category to facet to attribute caching built in - category to facet management - ability to manage facet groups (attributes within a set facet) and assign them to categories - ability to create any category structure and share facet groups - facet inheritance for any category (a facet group can be defined on a parent category and pushed down to all children) - ability to create sub-categories as facets instead of normal sub categories - simple xml configuration for the final outputted category configuration file I'm sure there are more cool things but that is all for now. Join the mailing list to see more improvements in the future. Also.. how do I get added to the Using Solr wiki page? Thanks, Mike Austin
