Re: CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

ow-up questions:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from
>> the source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?
>>>> 
>>>> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want
>> operations applied out of order)
>>>> 
>>>> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does
>> that mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long
>> it takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms,
>> then I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
>> daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may
>> be less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know
>> it's all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP
>> ping.   Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a
>> response to a request before sending the next action, then just like any
>> network protocol that does that, it will get slow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also
>> check whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it
>> to be a single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.
>> Some proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send
>> response, close), and that will hurt.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge -
>> checkout paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same
>> distribution of skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.
>> I still improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with
>> 1-line of code.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with
>> indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
>>>>> 
>>>>> curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>>>>> {
>>>>>   "responseHeader": {
>>>>> "status": 0,
>>>>> "QTime": 0
>>>>>   },
>>>>>   "operationsPerSecond": [
>>>>> "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>>>>> [
>>>>>   "mycollection",
>>>>>   [
>>>>> "all",
>>>>> 49.10140553500938,
>>>>> "adds",
>>>>> 10.27612635309587,
>>>>> "deletes",
>>>>> 38.82527896994054
>>>>>   ]
>>>>> ]
>>>>>   ]
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center
>> and the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough
>> network performance: ~181 Mbit/s
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728,
>> 1000, 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the
>> performance?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
>>>>> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
>> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
>> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
>> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 51

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Susheel Kumar]

> >>
> > > > >> Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing
> that
> > > the
> > > > requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each
> > > update
> > > > comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit
> > > from
> > > > the source to the target and instead each document is posted
> > separately?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't
> > want
> > > > operations applied out of order)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way,
> > > does
> > > > that mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how
> > > long
> > > > it takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is
> > 25ms,
> > > > then I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
> > > > daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but
> > may
> > > > be less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I
> > know
> > > > it's all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or
> > TCP
> > > > ping.   Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a
> > > > response to a request before sending the next action, then just like
> > any
> > > > network protocol that does that, it will get slow.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so
> also
> > > > check whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is
> causing
> > it
> > > > to be a single connection per operation.   That will *kill*
> > performance.
> > > >  Some proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send
> > > > response, close), and that will hurt.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge -
> > > > checkout paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same
> > > > distribution of skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so
> > > well.
> > > >  I still improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call
> > with
> > > > 1-line of code.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -Original Message-
> > > > >>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
> > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
> > > > >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > > >>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date
> > with
> > > > indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>  curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
> > > > >>>  {
> > > > >>>"responseHeader": {
> > > > >>>  "status": 0,
> > > > >>>  "QTime": 0
> > > > >>>},
> > > > >>>"operationsPerSecond": [
> > > > >>>  "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
> > > > >>>  [
> > > > >>>"mycollection",
> > > > >>>[
> > > > >>>  "all",
> > > > >>>  49.10140553500938,
> > > > >>>  "adds",
> > > > >>>  10.27612635309587,
> > > > >>>  "deletes",
> > > > >>>  38.82527896994054
> > > > >>>]
&g

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Amrit Sarkar]

a single document? ie. If my average ping is
> 25ms,
> > > then I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
> > > daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but
> may
> > > be less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I
> know
> > > it's all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or
> TCP
> > > ping.   Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a
> > > response to a request before sending the next action, then just like
> any
> > > network protocol that does that, it will get slow.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also
> > > check whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing
> it
> > > to be a single connection per operation.   That will *kill*
> performance.
> > >  Some proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send
> > > response, close), and that will hurt.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge -
> > > checkout paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same
> > > distribution of skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so
> > well.
> > >  I still improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call
> with
> > > 1-line of code.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -Original Message-
> > > >>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
> > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
> > > >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > >>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date
> with
> > > indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
> > > >>>  {
> > > >>>"responseHeader": {
> > > >>>  "status": 0,
> > > >>>  "QTime": 0
> > > >>>},
> > > >>>"operationsPerSecond": [
> > > >>>  "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
> > > >>>  [
> > > >>>"mycollection",
> > > >>>[
> > > >>>  "all",
> > > >>>  49.10140553500938,
> > > >>>  "adds",
> > > >>>  10.27612635309587,
> > > >>>  "deletes",
> > > >>>  38.82527896994054
> > > >>>]
> > > >>>  ]
> > > >>>]
> > > >>>  }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data
> > center
> > > and the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough
> > > network performance: ~181 Mbit/s
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512,
> 728,
> > > 1000, 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the
> > > performance?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's
> leader:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-
> > processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollecti

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Susheel Kumar]

es HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also
> > check whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it
> > to be a single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.
> >  Some proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send
> > response, close), and that will hurt.
> > >>>
> > >>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge -
> > checkout paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same
> > distribution of skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so
> well.
> >  I still improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with
> > 1-line of code.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Original Message-
> > >>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
> > >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with
> > indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
> > >>>
> > >>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
> > >>>
> > >>>  curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
> > >>>  {
> > >>>"responseHeader": {
> > >>>  "status": 0,
> > >>>  "QTime": 0
> > >>>},
> > >>>"operationsPerSecond": [
> > >>>  "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
> > >>>  [
> > >>>"mycollection",
> > >>>[
> > >>>  "all",
> > >>>  49.10140553500938,
> > >>>  "adds",
> > >>>  10.27612635309587,
> > >>>  "deletes",
> > >>>  38.82527896994054
> > >>>]
> > >>>  ]
> > >>>]
> > >>>  }
> > >>>
> > >>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
> > >>>
> > >>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data
> center
> > and the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough
> > network performance: ~181 Mbit/s
> > >>>
> > >>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728,
> > 1000, 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the
> > performance?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:
> > >>>
> > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-
> processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
> > o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
> > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-
> processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
> > o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
> > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-
> processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
> > o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
> > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-
> processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
> > o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
> > >>>  2018-03-07 23:16:42.091 INFO  (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-2-
> processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr
> > x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9)
> > [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6]
> > o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwa

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Amrit Sarkar]

Hey Tom,

I'm also having issue with replicas in the target data center. It will go
> from recovering to down. And when one of my replicas go to down in the
> target data center, CDCR will no longer send updates from the source to
> the target.


Are you able to figure out the issue? As long as the leaders of each shard
in each collection is up and serving, CDCR shouldn't stop.

Sometimes we have to reindex a large chunk of our index (1M+ documents).
> What's the best way to handle this if the normal CDCR process won't be
> able to keep up? Manually trigger a bootstrap again? Or is there something
> else we can do?
>

That's one of the limitations of CDCR, it cannot handle bulk indexing,
preferable way to do is
* stop cdcr
* bulk index
* issue manual BOOTSTRAP (it is independent of stop and start cdcr)
* start cdcr

1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from the
> source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?


The batchsize and schedule regulate how many docs are sent across target.
This has more details:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/cdcr-config.html#the-replicator-element




Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucidworks.com
Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:

> I'm also having issue with replicas in the target data center. It will go
> from recovering to down. And when one of my replicas go to down in the
> target data center, CDCR will no longer send updates from the source to the
> target.
>
> > On Mar 12, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone have any thoughts on the questions I raised?
> >
> > I have another question related to CDCR:
> > Sometimes we have to reindex a large chunk of our index (1M+ documents).
> What's the best way to handle this if the normal CDCR process won't be able
> to keep up? Manually trigger a bootstrap again? Or is there something else
> we can do?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mar 9, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the
> requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update
> comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:
> >>
> >> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from
> the source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?
> >>
> >> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want
> operations applied out of order)
> >>
> >> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does
> that mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long
> it takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms,
> then I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <
> daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may
> be less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know
> it's all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
> >>>
> >>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP
> ping.   Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a
> response to a request before sending the next action, then just like any
> network protocol that does that, it will get slow.
> >>>
> >>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also
> check whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it
> to be a single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.
>  Some proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send
> response, close), and that will hurt.
> >>>
> >>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge -
> checkout paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same
> distribution of skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.
>  I still improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with
> 1-line of code.
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
> >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >&

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

I'm also having issue with replicas in the target data center. It will go from 
recovering to down. And when one of my replicas go to down in the target data 
center, CDCR will no longer send updates from the source to the target.

> On Mar 12, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:
> 
> Anyone have any thoughts on the questions I raised?
> 
> I have another question related to CDCR:
> Sometimes we have to reindex a large chunk of our index (1M+ documents). 
> What's the best way to handle this if the normal CDCR process won't be able 
> to keep up? Manually trigger a bootstrap again? Or is there something else we 
> can do?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the 
>> requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update 
>> comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:
>> 
>> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from the 
>> source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?
>> 
>> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want 
>> operations applied out of order)
>> 
>> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does that 
>> mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long it 
>> takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms, then 
>> I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] 
>>> <daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be 
>>> less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's 
>>> all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
>>> 
>>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP ping.  
>>>  Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response to a 
>>> request before sending the next action, then just like any network protocol 
>>> that does that, it will get slow.
>>> 
>>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check 
>>> whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a 
>>> single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some 
>>> proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response, 
>>> close), and that will hurt.
>>> 
>>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout 
>>> paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of 
>>> skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still 
>>> improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of 
>>> code.
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com] 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
>>> 
>>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with 
>>> indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
>>> 
>>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
>>> 
>>>  curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>>>  {
>>>"responseHeader": {
>>>  "status": 0,
>>>  "QTime": 0
>>>},
>>>"operationsPerSecond": [
>>>  "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>>>  [
>>>"mycollection",
>>>[
>>>  "all",
>>>  49.10140553500938,
>>>  "adds",
>>>  10.27612635309587,
>>>  "deletes",
>>>  38.82527896994054
>>>]
>>>  ]
>>>]
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
>>> 
>>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and 
>>> the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network 
>>> performance: ~181 Mbit/s
>>> 
>>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
>>> 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a differe

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

Anyone have any thoughts on the questions I raised?

I have another question related to CDCR:
Sometimes we have to reindex a large chunk of our index (1M+ documents). What's 
the best way to handle this if the normal CDCR process won't be able to keep 
up? Manually trigger a bootstrap again? Or is there something else we can do?

Thanks.



> On Mar 9, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Tom Peters <tpet...@synacor.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the 
> requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update 
> comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:
> 
> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from the 
> source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?
> 
> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want 
> operations applied out of order)
> 
> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does that 
> mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long it 
> takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms, then I 
> can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] 
>> <daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be less 
>> familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's all 
>> TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
>> 
>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP ping.   
>> Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response to a 
>> request before sending the next action, then just like any network protocol 
>> that does that, it will get slow.
>> 
>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check 
>> whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a 
>> single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some 
>> proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response, 
>> close), and that will hurt.
>> 
>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout 
>> paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of 
>> skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still 
>> improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of 
>> code.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
>> 
>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with 
>> indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
>> 
>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
>> 
>>   curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>>   {
>> "responseHeader": {
>>   "status": 0,
>>   "QTime": 0
>> },
>> "operationsPerSecond": [
>>   "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>>   [
>> "mycollection",
>> [
>>   "all",
>>   49.10140553500938,
>>   "adds",
>>   10.27612635309587,
>>   "deletes",
>>   38.82527896994054
>> ]
>>   ]
>> ]
>>   }
>> 
>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
>> 
>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and 
>> the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network 
>> performance: ~181 Mbit/s
>> 
>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
>> 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
>> 
>> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:
>> 
>>   2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
>> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
>> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
>> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
>> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>>   2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
>> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-proce

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Erick Erickson]

John:

_What_ did you try and how did it fail?

Please follow the instructions here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc

. You must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe.


If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the
"problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But note you need
to show us the _entire_ return header to allow anyone to diagnose the
problem.


Best,

Erick

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:00 PM, john spooner <john.spoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> please unsubscribe i tried to manaually unsubscribe
>
>
>
> On 3/9/2018 12:59 PM, Tom Peters wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the
>> requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update
>> comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:
>>
>> 1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from
>> the source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?
>>
>> 2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want
>> operations applied out of order)
>>
>> 3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does
>> that mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long
>> it takes to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms,
>> then I can expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
>>> <daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be
>>> less familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's
>>> all TCP sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
>>>
>>> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP
>>> ping.   Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response
>>> to a request before sending the next action, then just like any network
>>> protocol that does that, it will get slow.
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check
>>> whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a
>>> single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some
>>> proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response,
>>> close), and that will hurt.
>>>
>>> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout
>>> paper "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of
>>> skills - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still
>>> improved response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of
>>> code.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: CDCR performance issues
>>>
>>> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with
>>> indexing from the source collection using CDCR.
>>>
>>> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
>>>
>>> curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>>> {
>>>   "responseHeader": {
>>> "status": 0,
>>> "QTime": 0
>>>   },
>>>   "operationsPerSecond": [
>>> "zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>>> [
>>>   "mycollection",
>>>   [
>>> "all",
>>> 49.10140553500938,
>>> "adds",
>>> 10.27612635309587,
>>> "deletes",
>>> 38.82527896994054
>>>   ]
>>> ]
>>>   ]
>>> }
>>>
>>> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
>>>
>>> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center
>>> and the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network
>>> performance: ~181 Mbit/s
>>>
>>> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728,
>>> 1000, 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?
>>>
>>>

Re: CDCR performance issues

[john spooner]

please unsubscribe i tried to manaually unsubscribe


On 3/9/2018 12:59 PM, Tom Peters wrote:

Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the 
requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update 
comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:

1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from the 
source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?

2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want 
operations applied out of order)

3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does that 
mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long it takes 
to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms, then I can 
expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.

Thanks




On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] <daniel.da...@nih.gov> 
wrote:

These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be less 
familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's all TCP 
sockets, so general guidelines do apply.

Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP ping.   
Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response to a 
request before sending the next action, then just like any network protocol 
that does that, it will get slow.

I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check 
whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a 
single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some proxies 
default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response, close), and that 
will hurt.

Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout paper 
"Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of skills - 
I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still improved response time of 
Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of code.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: CDCR performance issues

I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with indexing 
from the source collection using CDCR.

This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:

curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
{
  "responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0
  },
  "operationsPerSecond": [
"zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
[
  "mycollection",
  [
"all",
49.10140553500938,
"adds",
10.27612635309587,
"deletes",
38.82527896994054
  ]
]
  ]
}

The source and target collections are in separate data centers.

Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and the 
ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network 
performance: ~181 Mbit/s

I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.

Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?

Thanks

--

Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:

2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:42.091 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-2-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forw

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

Thanks. This was helpful. I did some tcpdumps and I'm noticing that the 
requests to the target data center are not batched in any way. Each update 
comes in as an independent update. Some follow-up questions:

1. Is it accurate that updates are not actually batched in transit from the 
source to the target and instead each document is posted separately?

2. Are they done synchronously? I assume yes (since you wouldn't want 
operations applied out of order)

3. If they are done synchronously, and are not batched in any way, does that 
mean that the best performance I can expect would be roughly how long it takes 
to round-trip a single document? ie. If my average ping is 25ms, then I can 
expect a peak performance of roughly 40 ops/s.

Thanks



> On Mar 9, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] 
> <daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote:
> 
> These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be less 
> familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's all TCP 
> sockets, so general guidelines do apply.
> 
> Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP ping.   
> Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response to a 
> request before sending the next action, then just like any network protocol 
> that does that, it will get slow.
> 
> I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check 
> whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a 
> single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some 
> proxies default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response, 
> close), and that will hurt.
> 
> Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout paper 
> "Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of skills 
> - I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still improved 
> response time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of code.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: CDCR performance issues
> 
> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with indexing 
> from the source collection using CDCR.
> 
> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
> 
>curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>{
>  "responseHeader": {
>"status": 0,
>"QTime": 0
>  },
>  "operationsPerSecond": [
>"zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>[
>  "mycollection",
>  [
>"all",
>49.10140553500938,
>"adds",
>10.27612635309587,
>"deletes",
>38.82527896994054
>  ]
>]
>  ]
>}
> 
> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
> 
> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and 
> the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network 
> performance: ~181 Mbit/s
> 
> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
> 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
> 
> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> 
> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:
> 
>2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n

RE: CDCR performance issues

[Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]]

These are general guidelines, I've done loads of networking, but may be less 
familiar with SolrCloud  and CDCR architecture.  However, I know it's all TCP 
sockets, so general guidelines do apply.

Check the round-trip time between the data centers using ping or TCP ping.   
Throughput tests may be high, but if Solr has to wait for a response to a 
request before sending the next action, then just like any network protocol 
that does that, it will get slow.

I'm pretty sure CDCR uses HTTP/HTTPS rather than just TCP, so also check 
whether some proxy/load balancer between data centers is causing it to be a 
single connection per operation.   That will *kill* performance.   Some proxies 
default to HTTP/1.0 (open, send request, server send response, close), and that 
will hurt.

Why you should listen to me even without SolrCloud knowledge - checkout paper 
"Latency performance of SOAP Implementations".   Same distribution of skills - 
I knew TCP well, but Apache Axis 1.1 not so well.   I still improved response 
time of Apache Axis 1.1 by 250ms per call with 1-line of code.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Peters [mailto:tpet...@synacor.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 6:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: CDCR performance issues

I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with indexing 
from the source collection using CDCR.
 
This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:

curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
{
  "responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0
  },
  "operationsPerSecond": [
"zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
[
  "mycollection",
  [
"all",
49.10140553500938,
"adds",
10.27612635309587,
"deletes",
38.82527896994054
  ]
]
  ]
}

The source and target collections are in separate data centers.

Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and the 
ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center show decent enough network 
performance: ~181 Mbit/s

I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.

Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?

Thanks

--

Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:

2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:42.091 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-2-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:46.790 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:50.004 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection


And what the log looks like in the target:

2018-03-07 23:18:46.475 INFO  (qtp1595212853-26) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&am

Re: CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

So I'm continuing to look into this and not making much headway, but I have 
additional questions now as well.

I restarted the nodes in the source data center to see if it would have any 
impact. It appeared to initiate another bootstrap with the target. The lag and 
queueSize were brought back down to zero.

Over the next two hours the queueSize has grown back to 106,122 (as reported by 
solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=QUEUES). When I actually look at what we sent to 
Solr though, I only deleted or added a total of 3,805 documents. Could this be 
part of the problem? Should queueSize be representative of the total number of 
document updates, or are there other updates under the hood that I wouldn't see 
that would still need to be tracked by Solr.

Also, if there are any other suggestions on my original issue which is that the 
CDCR cannot keep up despite the relatively low number of updates (3805 over two 
hours).

Thanks. 

> On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:19 PM, Tom Peters  wrote:
> 
> I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with indexing 
> from the source collection using CDCR.
> 
> This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:
> 
>curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
>{
>  "responseHeader": {
>"status": 0,
>"QTime": 0
>  },
>  "operationsPerSecond": [
>"zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
>[
>  "mycollection",
>  [
>"all",
>49.10140553500938,
>"adds",
>10.27612635309587,
>"deletes",
>38.82527896994054
>  ]
>]
>  ]
>}
> 
> The source and target collections are in separate data centers.
> 
> Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and 
> the ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center
> show decent enough network performance: ~181 Mbit/s
> 
> I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
> 2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.
> 
> Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> 
> Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:
> 
>2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:42.091 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-2-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:46.790 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
>2018-03-07 23:16:50.004 INFO  
> (cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
> x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
> [c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
> o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
> 
> 
> And what the log looks like in the target:
> 
>2018-03-07 23:18:46.475 INFO  (qtp1595212853-26) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
> r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
> [mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
> params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067896487950==javabin=2}
>  status=0 QTime=0
>2018-03-07 23:18:46.500 INFO  (qtp1595212853-25) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
> r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
> 

CDCR performance issues

[Tom Peters]

I'm having issues with the target collection staying up-to-date with indexing 
from the source collection using CDCR.
 
This is what I'm getting back in terms of OPS:

curl -s 'solr2-a:8080/solr/mycollection/cdcr?action=OPS' | jq .
{
  "responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0
  },
  "operationsPerSecond": [
"zook01,zook02,zook03/solr",
[
  "mycollection",
  [
"all",
49.10140553500938,
"adds",
10.27612635309587,
"deletes",
38.82527896994054
  ]
]
  ]
}

The source and target collections are in separate data centers.

Doing a network test between the leader node in the source data center and the 
ZooKeeper nodes in the target data center
show decent enough network performance: ~181 Mbit/s

I've tried playing around with the "batchSize" value (128, 512, 728, 1000, 
2000, 2500) and they've haven't made much of a difference.

Any suggestions on potential settings to tune to improve the performance?

Thanks

--

Here's some relevant log lines from the source data center's leader:

2018-03-07 23:16:11.984 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:23.062 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 510 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:32.063 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-5-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:36.209 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-1-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:42.091 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-2-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:46.790 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-3-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 511 updates to target mycollection
2018-03-07 23:16:50.004 INFO  
(cdcr-replicator-207-thread-4-processing-n:solr2-a:8080_solr 
x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6 s:shard1 c:mycollection r:core_node9) 
[c:mycollection s:shard1 r:core_node9 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n6] 
o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Forwarded 512 updates to target mycollection


And what the log looks like in the target:

2018-03-07 23:18:46.475 INFO  (qtp1595212853-26) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067896487950==javabin=2}
 status=0 QTime=0
2018-03-07 23:18:46.500 INFO  (qtp1595212853-25) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067896487951==javabin=2}
 status=0 QTime=0
2018-03-07 23:18:46.525 INFO  (qtp1595212853-24) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067897536512==javabin=2}
 status=0 QTime=0
2018-03-07 23:18:46.550 INFO  (qtp1595212853-3793) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067897536513==javabin=2}
 status=0 QTime=0
2018-03-07 23:18:46.575 INFO  (qtp1595212853-30) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2 x:mycollection_shard1_replica_n1] o.a.s.c.S.Request 
[mycollection_shard1_replica_n1]  webapp=/solr path=/update 
params={_stateVer_=mycollection:30&_version_=-1594317067897536514==javabin=2}
 status=0 QTime=0
2018-03-07 23:18:46.600 INFO  (qtp1595212853-26) [c:mycollection s:shard1 
r:core_node2