Re: Commit required after delete ?
Alessandro, I'm not sure which code reference are you asking about, but here they are: http://lucene.apache.org/core/6_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/DirectoryReader.html#openIfChanged-org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader-org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter-boolean- http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/06/lucenes-near-real-time-search-is-fast.html On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:09 PM, alessandro.benedetti wrote: > Interesting Michael, can you pass me the code reference? > > Cheers > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Commit-required-after-delete-tp4312697p4313692.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
Re: Commit required after delete ?
Interesting Michael, can you pass me the code reference? Cheers -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Commit-required-after-delete-tp4312697p4313692.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Commit required after delete ?
Hello, Friend! You absolutely need to commit to make delete visible. And even more, when "softCommit" is issued in Lucene level, there is a flag which ignores deletes for sake of performance. 06 янв. 2017 г. 10:55 пользователь "Dorian Hoxha" написал: Hello friends, Based on what I've read, I think "commit" isn't needed to make deletes active (like we do with index/update), right ? Since it just marks an in-memory deleted-id bitmap, right ? Thank You
Commit required after delete ?
Hello friends, Based on what I've read, I think "commit" isn't needed to make deletes active (like we do with index/update), right ? Since it just marks an in-memory deleted-id bitmap, right ? Thank You
