Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
I don't have any additional questions, and won't, until you are able to supply the information requested in my previous response. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Kuchekar Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:46 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index Hi, Following is the debug query results : *Solr 3.5* true 60.67038 sum of: true 60.67038 max plus 1.0 times others of: true 0.44362593 weight(content:cancer^0.5 in 21506339), product of: true 0.009291923 queryWeight(content:cancer^0.5), product of: true 0.5 boost true 3.5684927 idf(docFreq=1682287, maxDocs=21947370) true 0.005207758 queryNorm true 47.74318 fieldWeight(content:cancer in 21506339), product of: true 13.379088 * tf(termFreq(content:cancer)=179)* true 3.5684927 idf(docFreq=1682287, maxDocs=21947370) true 1.0 fieldNorm(field=content, doc=21506339) *Solr 4.4 debug query :* * * true 67.04259 max plus 1.0 times others of: true 0.75314933 weight(content:cancer^0.5 in 20543947) [DefaultSimilarity], result of: true 0.75314933 score(doc=20543947,freq=515.0 = termFreq=515.0 ), product of: true 0.009295603 queryWeight, product of: true 0.5 boost true 3.5702603 idf(docFreq=1678887, maxDocs=21941764) true 0.005207241 queryNorm true 81.0221 fieldWeight in 20543947, product of: true 22.693611 tf(freq=515.0), with freq of: true 515.0 termFreq=515.0 true 3.5702603 idf(docFreq=1678887, maxDocs=21941764) true 1.0 fieldNorm(doc=20543947) Search for the term 'cancer' in the field 'content' should me the count to be 515. Please let me known if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: There may be some token filters that are emitting a different number of terms. There are so many changes between 3.5 and 4.4, that it simply isn't worth the trouble to track down all of them. In some cases, there may be bugs in 3.5 that have gotten fixed in any of the intervening releases. Do you have a specific example - the input text and the field and field type and analyzer where the tf differs? That should suggest where the differences come from. Do you have any specific reason to believe that one of the counts is more right than the other? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Kuchekar Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Stefan Matheis Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index Hi, After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different. example : If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20. that is changing the the score. Also we see that the function 'idf' which depends upon the max doc is changed. Are there any changes in 'termFrequency' and 'idf' function in solr 4.4 compared to solr 3.5. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kuchekar ** wrote: Hi, Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' value in the solr? Is this happenin
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, The input text = 'cancer', field = 'content', field type ='text_general'. Analyzer for the filed is as follows : < filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> Manual Search count on the term 'cancer' in the field 'content', gave me 515 hits. This makes me believe that tf in 4.4 is correct compared to that in Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > I don't have any additional questions, and won't, until you are able to > supply the information requested in my previous response. > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Kuchekar > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:46 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index > > Hi, > >Following is the debug query results : > > *Solr 3.5* > > > > true > 60.67038 > sum of: > > > true > 60.67038 > max plus 1.0 times others of: > > > true > 0.44362593 > weight(**content:cancer^0.5 in 21506339), > product of: > > > true > 0.009291923 > **queryWeight(content:cancer^0.**5), > product of: > > > true > 0.5 > boost > > > true > 3.5684927 > idf(**docFreq=1682287, > maxDocs=21947370) > > > true > 0.005207758 > queryNorm > > > > > true > 47.74318 > **fieldWeight(content:cancer in > 21506339), product of: > > > true > 13.379088 > * name="description">tf(**termFreq(content:cancer)=179)<**/str>* > > > > true > 3.5684927 > idf(**docFreq=1682287, > maxDocs=21947370) > > > true > 1.0 > fieldNorm(**field=content, > doc=21506339) > > > > > > > > *Solr 4.4 debug query :* > * > > * > > true > 67.04259 > max plus 1.0 times others of: > > > true > 0.75314933 > weight(**content:cancer^0.5 in 20543947) > [DefaultSimilarity], result of: > > > true > 0.75314933 > score(doc=**20543947,freq=515.0 = > termFreq=515.0 ), product of: > > > true > 0.009295603 > **queryWeight, product of: > > > true > 0.5 > boost > > > true > 3.5702603 > idf(**docFreq=1678887, > maxDocs=21941764) > > > true > 0.005207241 > queryNorm > > > > > true > 81.0221 > fieldWeight in 20543947, product > of: > > > true > 22.693611 > tf(freq=**515.0), with freq > of: > > > true > 515.0 > termFreq=**515.0 > > > > > true > 3.5702603 > idf(**docFreq=1678887, > maxDocs=21941764) > > > true > 1.0 > fieldNorm(**doc=20543947) > > > > > > > > > Search for the term 'cancer' in the field 'content' should me the count to > be 515. > > Please let me known if you have any questions or concerns. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Jack Krupansky > **wrote: > > There may be some token filters that are emitting a different number of >> terms.
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, Following is the debug query results : *Solr 3.5* true 60.67038 sum of: true 60.67038 max plus 1.0 times others of: true 0.44362593 weight(content:cancer^0.5 in 21506339), product of: true 0.009291923 queryWeight(content:cancer^0.5), product of: true 0.5 boost true 3.5684927 idf(docFreq=1682287, maxDocs=21947370) true 0.005207758 queryNorm true 47.74318 fieldWeight(content:cancer in 21506339), product of: true 13.379088 * tf(termFreq(content:cancer)=179)* true 3.5684927 idf(docFreq=1682287, maxDocs=21947370) true 1.0 fieldNorm(field=content, doc=21506339) *Solr 4.4 debug query :* * * true 67.04259 max plus 1.0 times others of: true 0.75314933 weight(content:cancer^0.5 in 20543947) [DefaultSimilarity], result of: true 0.75314933 score(doc=20543947,freq=515.0 = termFreq=515.0 ), product of: true 0.009295603 queryWeight, product of: true 0.5 boost true 3.5702603 idf(docFreq=1678887, maxDocs=21941764) true 0.005207241 queryNorm true 81.0221 fieldWeight in 20543947, product of: true 22.693611 tf(freq=515.0), with freq of: true 515.0 termFreq=515.0 true 3.5702603 idf(docFreq=1678887, maxDocs=21941764) true 1.0 fieldNorm(doc=20543947) Search for the term 'cancer' in the field 'content' should me the count to be 515. Please let me known if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > There may be some token filters that are emitting a different number of > terms. There are so many changes between 3.5 and 4.4, that it simply isn't > worth the trouble to track down all of them. In some cases, there may be > bugs in 3.5 that have gotten fixed in any of the intervening releases. > > Do you have a specific example - the input text and the field and field > type and analyzer where the tf differs? That should suggest where the > differences come from. > > Do you have any specific reason to believe that one of the counts is more > right than the other? > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Kuchekar > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Stefan Matheis > Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index > > Hi, > > After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for > the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different. > > example : > > If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times > > In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20. > that is changing the the score. > > Also we see that the function 'idf' which depends upon the max doc is > changed. > > Are there any changes in 'termFrequency' and 'idf' function in solr 4.4 > compared to solr 3.5. > > Looking forward for your reply. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kuchekar ** > wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' &
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
There may be some token filters that are emitting a different number of terms. There are so many changes between 3.5 and 4.4, that it simply isn't worth the trouble to track down all of them. In some cases, there may be bugs in 3.5 that have gotten fixed in any of the intervening releases. Do you have a specific example - the input text and the field and field type and analyzer where the tf differs? That should suggest where the differences come from. Do you have any specific reason to believe that one of the counts is more right than the other? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Kuchekar Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Stefan Matheis Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index Hi, After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different. example : If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20. that is changing the the score. Also we see that the function 'idf' which depends upon the max doc is changed. Are there any changes in 'termFrequency' and 'idf' function in solr 4.4 compared to solr 3.5. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' value in the solr? Is this happening due to changing value of 'maxDoc' value after each optimization. As in, in solr 4.4 every time optimization is ran, the 'maxDoc' value is reset, where as this is not the case in solr 3.5. Looking forward for the reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Michael Sokolov < msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true" for primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on confusion: our developers may have omitted norms from some other fields they shouldn't have? -Mike On 08/26/2013 09:46 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the score was calculated. - Stefan On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the sequence in which results are given us back. For example : Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... Looking forward your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis (mailto:matheis.stefan@gmail.**com )>wrote: Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, that some are missing you'd expect to be there? - Stefan On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same query params. My query param are as following : facet=true &facet.mincount=1 &facet.limit=25 &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^**500.0+p_first_name^50.0+** strong_topic^0.0+first_author_**topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.** 0+title_topic^0.0 &wt=javabin &version=2 &rows=10 &f.affiliation_org.facet.**limit=150 &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_**name &start=0 &q=Apple &facet.field=affiliation_org &fq=table:profile &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] &fq=name:"Apple" The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, which might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different. example : If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20. that is changing the the score. Also we see that the function 'idf' which depends upon the max doc is changed. Are there any changes in 'termFrequency' and 'idf' function in solr 4.4 compared to solr 3.5. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kuchekar wrote: > Hi, > > Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' > value in the solr? Is this happening due to changing value of 'maxDoc' > value after each optimization. As in, in solr 4.4 every time optimization > is ran, the 'maxDoc' value is reset, where as this is not the case in solr > 3.5. > > Looking forward for the reply. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Michael Sokolov < > msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: > >> We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a >> definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our >> current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true" for >> primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on >> confusion: our developers may have omitted norms from some other fields >> they shouldn't have? >> >> -Mike >> >> >> On 08/26/2013 09:46 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: >> >>> Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. >>> additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the >>> score was calculated. >>> >>> - Stefan >>> >>> >>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: >>> >>> Hi, The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the sequence in which results are given us back. For example : Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... Looking forward your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis >>> (mailto:matheis.stefan@gmail.**com )>wrote: Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) > > you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or > does > the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, > that some are missing you'd expect to be there? > > - Stefan > > > On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: > > Hi, >> >> We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same >> query params. >> >> My query param are as following : >> >> facet=true >> &facet.mincount=1 >> &facet.limit=25 >> >> &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^**500.0+p_first_name^50.0+** > strong_topic^0.0+first_author_**topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.** > 0+title_topic^0.0 > >> &wt=javabin >> &version=2 >> &rows=10 >> &f.affiliation_org.facet.**limit=150 >> &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_**name >> &start=0 >> &q=Apple >> &facet.field=affiliation_org >> &fq=table:profile >> &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] >> &fq=name:"Apple" >> >> The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. >> >> The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. >> >> Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, >> > which > >> might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. >> >> Looking forward for your reply. >> >> Thanks. >> Kuchekar, Nilesh >> >> > >>> >>> >> >
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' value in the solr? Is this happening due to changing value of 'maxDoc' value after each optimization. As in, in solr 4.4 every time optimization is ran, the 'maxDoc' value is reset, where as this is not the case in solr 3.5. Looking forward for the reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Michael Sokolov < msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: > We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a > definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our > current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true" for > primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on > confusion: our developers may have omitted norms from some other fields > they shouldn't have? > > -Mike > > > On 08/26/2013 09:46 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: > >> Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. >> additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the >> score was calculated. >> >> - Stefan >> >> >> On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the >>> sequence in which results are given us back. >>> >>> For example : >>> >>> Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... >>> Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... >>> >>> Looking forward your reply. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Kuchekar, Nilesh >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis >>> >> (mailto:matheis.stefan@gmail.**com >>> )>wrote: >>> >>> Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, that some are missing you'd expect to be there? - Stefan On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, > > We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same > query params. > > My query param are as following : > > facet=true > &facet.mincount=1 > &facet.limit=25 > > &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^**500.0+p_first_name^50.0+** strong_topic^0.0+first_author_**topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.** 0+title_topic^0.0 > &wt=javabin > &version=2 > &rows=10 > &f.affiliation_org.facet.**limit=150 > &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_**name > &start=0 > &q=Apple > &facet.field=affiliation_org > &fq=table:profile > &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] > &fq=name:"Apple" > > The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. > > The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. > > Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, > which > might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. > > Looking forward for your reply. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > >>> >>> >> >> >
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true" for primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on confusion: our developers may have omitted norms from some other fields they shouldn't have? -Mike On 08/26/2013 09:46 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the score was calculated. - Stefan On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the sequence in which results are given us back. For example : Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... Looking forward your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis mailto:matheis.ste...@gmail.com)>wrote: Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, that some are missing you'd expect to be there? - Stefan On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: Hi, We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same query params. My query param are as following : facet=true &facet.mincount=1 &facet.limit=25 &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0 &wt=javabin &version=2 &rows=10 &f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150 &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name &start=0 &q=Apple &facet.field=affiliation_org &fq=table:profile &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] &fq=name:"Apple" The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, which might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the score was calculated. - Stefan On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: > Hi, > The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the > sequence in which results are given us back. > > For example : > > Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... > Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... > > Looking forward your reply. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis > mailto:matheis.ste...@gmail.com)>wrote: > > > Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) > > > > you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does > > the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, > > that some are missing you'd expect to be there? > > > > - Stefan > > > > > > On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same > > > query params. > > > > > > My query param are as following : > > > > > > facet=true > > > &facet.mincount=1 > > > &facet.limit=25 > > > > > > > &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0 > > > &wt=javabin > > > &version=2 > > > &rows=10 > > > &f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150 > > > &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name > > > &start=0 > > > &q=Apple > > > &facet.field=affiliation_org > > > &fq=table:profile > > > &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] > > > &fq=name:"Apple" > > > > > > The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. > > > > > > The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. > > > > > > Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, > > which > > > might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. > > > > > > Looking forward for your reply. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the sequence in which results are given us back. For example : Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... Looking forward your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: > Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) > > you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does > the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, > that some are missing you'd expect to be there? > > - Stefan > > > On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same > > query params. > > > > My query param are as following : > > > > facet=true > > &facet.mincount=1 > > &facet.limit=25 > > > &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0 > > &wt=javabin > > &version=2 > > &rows=10 > > &f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150 > > &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name > > &start=0 > > &q=Apple > > &facet.field=affiliation_org > > &fq=table:profile > > &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] > > &fq=name:"Apple" > > > > The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. > > > > The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. > > > > Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, > which > > might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. > > > > Looking forward for your reply. > > > > Thanks. > > Kuchekar, Nilesh > > > > > > >
Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, that some are missing you'd expect to be there? - Stefan On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote: > Hi, > > We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same > query params. > > My query param are as following : > > facet=true > &facet.mincount=1 > &facet.limit=25 > &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0 > &wt=javabin > &version=2 > &rows=10 > &f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150 > &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name > &start=0 > &q=Apple > &facet.field=affiliation_org > &fq=table:profile > &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] > &fq=name:"Apple" > > The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. > > The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. > > Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, which > might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. > > Looking forward for your reply. > > Thanks. > Kuchekar, Nilesh > >
Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index
Hi, We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same query params. My query param are as following : facet=true &facet.mincount=1 &facet.limit=25 &qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0 &wt=javabin &version=2 &rows=10 &f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150 &fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name &start=0 &q=Apple &facet.field=affiliation_org &fq=table:profile &fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500] &fq=name:"Apple" The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same. The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed. Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4, which might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same. Looking forward for your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Nilesh
