Re: space issue in search results
On 28 April 2014 12:42, PAVAN wrote: > > I have indexed title in the following way. > > honda cars in rajaji nagar > honda cars in rajajinagar. > > suppose if i search for > > honda cars in rajainagar (OR) > honda cars in rajaji nagar > > it has to display both the results. Please do not start multiple threads with the same question. The straightforward way to do what you want is to use synonyms: rajaji nagar, rajajinagar as presumably you want to collapse spaces only for things like place names. Regards, Gora
space issue in search results
I have indexed title in the following way. honda cars in rajaji nagar honda cars in rajajinagar. suppose if i search for honda cars in rajainagar (OR) honda cars in rajaji nagar it has to display both the results. Anybody help me how can we do this. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/space-issue-in-search-results-tp4133421.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
Thanks a lot Erick for trying this out. Will wait for a reply from your end. Thanks & Regards, Soumya. -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 April 2013 05:46 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results Good question, you're causing me to think... about code I know very little about . So rather than spouting off, I tried it and.. it works fine for me, either with or without using fast vector highlighter on, admittedly, a very simple test. So I think I'd try peeling off all the extra stuff you've put into your configs (sorry, I don't have time right now to try to reproduce) and get the very simple case working, then build the rest back up and see where the problem begins. Sorry for the mis-direction! Erick On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Soumyanayan Kar wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thanks for the reply. But help me understand this: If Solr is able to > isolate the two documents which contain the term "fact" being the > phonetic equivalent of the search term "fakt", then why will it be > unable to highlight the terms based on the same logic it uses to search the documents. > > Also, it is correctly highlighting the results in other searches which > are also approximate searches and not exact ones for eg. Fuzzy or > Synonym search. In these cases also the highlights in the search > results are far from the actual search term but still they are getting > correctly highlighted. > > Maybe I am getting it completely wrong but it looks like there is > something wrong with my implementation. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Soumya. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: 27 March 2013 06:07 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results > > How would you expect it to highlight successfully? The term is "fakt", > there's nothing built in (and, indeed couldn't be) to un-phoneticize > it into "fact" and apply that to the Content field. The whole point of > phonetic processing is to do a lossy translation from the word into > some variant, losing precision all the way. > > So this behavior is unsurprising... > > Best > Erick > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Soumyanayan Kar > > wrote: > >> When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the >> correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use >> Stemming or Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights. >> >> >> >> For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term >> fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it >> returns two documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token >> equivalent), but the list of highlights is empty as shown in the >> response below. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0 >> >> 16 >> >> >> >> ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt >> >> xml >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1 >> >> Doc 1 >> >> Anyway, this game was excellent and was >> well worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound >> track was pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a >> thief. >> >> 1430480998833848320 >> >> >> >> >> >> 2 >> >> Doc 2 >> >> stunning. The preacher was in fact an >> excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet >> from an exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his >> remarkable and tan. >> >> 1430480998841188352 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Relevant section of Solr schema: >> >> >> >> > required="true"/> >> >> > required="true"/> >> >> stored="true" >> required="true"/> >> >> >> >> > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> indexed="true"
Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
If you want to highlight, you need to turn on highlighting for the actual field you search, and that field needs to be stored, i.e. &hl.fl=ContentSearchPhonetic -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com 1. apr. 2013 kl. 14:16 skrev Erick Erickson : > Good question, you're causing me to think... about code I know very > little about . > > So rather than spouting off, I tried it and.. it works fine for me, either > with > or without using fast vector highlighter on, admittedly, a very simple test. > > So I think I'd try peeling off all the extra stuff you've put into your > configs > (sorry, I don't have time right now to try to reproduce) and get the very > simple case working, then build the rest back up and see where the > problem begins. > > Sorry for the mis-direction! > > Erick > > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Soumyanayan Kar > wrote: >> Hi Erick, >> >> Thanks for the reply. But help me understand this: If Solr is able to >> isolate the two documents which contain the term "fact" being the phonetic >> equivalent of the search term "fakt", then why will it be unable to >> highlight the terms based on the same logic it uses to search the documents. >> >> Also, it is correctly highlighting the results in other searches which are >> also approximate searches and not exact ones for eg. Fuzzy or Synonym >> search. In these cases also the highlights in the search results are far >> from the actual search term but still they are getting correctly >> highlighted. >> >> Maybe I am getting it completely wrong but it looks like there is something >> wrong with my implementation. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> Soumya. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 27 March 2013 06:07 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results >> >> How would you expect it to highlight successfully? The term is "fakt", >> there's nothing built in (and, indeed couldn't be) to un-phoneticize it into >> "fact" and apply that to the Content field. The whole point of phonetic >> processing is to do a lossy translation from the word into some variant, >> losing precision all the way. >> >> So this behavior is unsurprising... >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Soumyanayan Kar >> wrote: >> >>> When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the >>> correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use >>> Stemming or Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights. >>> >>> >>> >>> For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term >>> fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it >>> returns two documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token >>> equivalent), but the list of highlights is empty as shown in the >>> response below. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>0 >>> >>>16 >>> >>> >>> >>> ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt >>> >>> xml >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 1 >>> >>> Doc 1 >>> >>> Anyway, this game was excellent and was >>> well worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound >>> track was pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a >>> thief. >>> >>> 1430480998833848320 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2 >>> >>> Doc 2 >>> >>> stunning. The preacher was in fact an >>> excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet >>> from an exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his >>> remarkable and tan. >>> >>> 1430480998841188352 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
Good question, you're causing me to think... about code I know very little about . So rather than spouting off, I tried it and.. it works fine for me, either with or without using fast vector highlighter on, admittedly, a very simple test. So I think I'd try peeling off all the extra stuff you've put into your configs (sorry, I don't have time right now to try to reproduce) and get the very simple case working, then build the rest back up and see where the problem begins. Sorry for the mis-direction! Erick On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Soumyanayan Kar wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thanks for the reply. But help me understand this: If Solr is able to > isolate the two documents which contain the term "fact" being the phonetic > equivalent of the search term "fakt", then why will it be unable to > highlight the terms based on the same logic it uses to search the documents. > > Also, it is correctly highlighting the results in other searches which are > also approximate searches and not exact ones for eg. Fuzzy or Synonym > search. In these cases also the highlights in the search results are far > from the actual search term but still they are getting correctly > highlighted. > > Maybe I am getting it completely wrong but it looks like there is something > wrong with my implementation. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Soumya. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: 27 March 2013 06:07 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results > > How would you expect it to highlight successfully? The term is "fakt", > there's nothing built in (and, indeed couldn't be) to un-phoneticize it into > "fact" and apply that to the Content field. The whole point of phonetic > processing is to do a lossy translation from the word into some variant, > losing precision all the way. > > So this behavior is unsurprising... > > Best > Erick > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Soumyanayan Kar > wrote: > >> When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the >> correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use >> Stemming or Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights. >> >> >> >> For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term >> fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it >> returns two documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token >> equivalent), but the list of highlights is empty as shown in the >> response below. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0 >> >> 16 >> >> >> >> ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt >> >> xml >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1 >> >> Doc 1 >> >> Anyway, this game was excellent and was >> well worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound >> track was pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a >> thief. >> >> 1430480998833848320 >> >> >> >> >> >> 2 >> >> Doc 2 >> >> stunning. The preacher was in fact an >> excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet >> from an exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his >> remarkable and tan. >> >> 1430480998841188352 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Relevant section of Solr schema: >> >> >> >> > required="true"/> >> >> > required="true"/> >> >> stored="true" >> required="true"/> >> >> >> >> > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> indexed="true" >> stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> > stored="false" multiValued="true"/> >> >> >> >> DocId >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
RE: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the reply. But help me understand this: If Solr is able to
isolate the two documents which contain the term "fact" being the phonetic
equivalent of the search term "fakt", then why will it be unable to
highlight the terms based on the same logic it uses to search the documents.
Also, it is correctly highlighting the results in other searches which are
also approximate searches and not exact ones for eg. Fuzzy or Synonym
search. In these cases also the highlights in the search results are far
from the actual search term but still they are getting correctly
highlighted.
Maybe I am getting it completely wrong but it looks like there is something
wrong with my implementation.
Thanks & Regards,
Soumya.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2013 06:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
How would you expect it to highlight successfully? The term is "fakt",
there's nothing built in (and, indeed couldn't be) to un-phoneticize it into
"fact" and apply that to the Content field. The whole point of phonetic
processing is to do a lossy translation from the word into some variant,
losing precision all the way.
So this behavior is unsurprising...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Soumyanayan Kar wrote:
> When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the
> correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use
> Stemming or Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights.
>
>
>
> For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term
> fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it
> returns two documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token
> equivalent), but the list of highlights is empty as shown in the
> response below.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 0
>
> 16
>
>
>
> ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt
>
> xml
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1
>
> Doc 1
>
> Anyway, this game was excellent and was
> well worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound
> track was pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a
> thief.
>
> 1430480998833848320
>
>
>
>
>
> 2
>
> Doc 2
>
> stunning. The preacher was in fact an
> excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet
> from an exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his
> remarkable and tan.
>
> 1430480998841188352
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Relevant section of Solr schema:
>
>
>
> required="true"/>
>
> required="true"/>
>
> required="true"/>
>
>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
>
>
> DocId
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> encoder="DoubleMetaphone" inject="false"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Relevant section of Solr config:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>explicit
>
>100
>
>ContentSearch
>
> true
>
> Content
>
> 150
>
> 40
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> default="true"
>
> class="solr.highlight.GapFragmenter">
>
>
>
> 100
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> class="solr.highlight.RegexFragmenter">
>
>
>
>
>
> 70
>
>
>
> 0.5
>
>
>
> [-\w
> ,/\n\"']{20,200}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone experienced this kind of behaviour before? Need some
> direction for troubleshooting.
>
>
>
> Soumya.
>
>
>
>
>
>
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and
any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
email.
Re: Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
How would you expect it to highlight successfully? The term is "fakt",
there's nothing built in (and, indeed couldn't be) to un-phoneticize it
into "fact" and apply that to the Content field. The whole point of
phonetic processing is to do a lossy translation from the word into some
variant, losing precision all the way.
So this behavior is unsurprising...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Soumyanayan Kar wrote:
> When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the
> correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use Stemming or
> Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights.
>
>
>
> For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term
> fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it returns
> two
> documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token equivalent), but the
> list of highlights is empty as shown in the response below.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 0
>
> 16
>
>
>
> ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt
>
> xml
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1
>
> Doc 1
>
> Anyway, this game was excellent and was well
> worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound track was
> pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a thief.
>
> 1430480998833848320
>
>
>
>
>
> 2
>
> Doc 2
>
> stunning. The preacher was in fact an
> excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet from an
> exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his remarkable and
> tan.
>
> 1430480998841188352
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Relevant section of Solr schema:
>
>
>
> required="true"/>
>
> required="true"/>
>
> required="true"/>
>
>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
> stored="false" multiValued="true"/>
>
>
>
> DocId
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> encoder="DoubleMetaphone" inject="false"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Relevant section of Solr config:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>explicit
>
>100
>
>ContentSearch
>
> true
>
> Content
>
> 150
>
> 40
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> default="true"
>
> class="solr.highlight.GapFragmenter">
>
>
>
> 100
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> class="solr.highlight.RegexFragmenter">
>
>
>
>
>
> 70
>
>
>
> 0.5
>
>
>
> [-\w ,/\n\"']{20,200}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone experienced this kind of behaviour before? Need some direction
> for troubleshooting.
>
>
>
> Soumya.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Solr Phonetic Search Highlight issue in search results
When we are issuing a query with Phonetic Search, it is returning the
correct documents but not returning the highlights. When we use Stemming or
Synonym searches we are getting the proper highlights.
For example, when we execute a phonetic query for the term
fakt(ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt) in the Solr Admin interface, it returns two
documents containing the term "fact"(phonetic token equivalent), but the
list of highlights is empty as shown in the response below.
0
16
ContentSearchPhonetic:fakt
xml
1
Doc 1
Anyway, this game was excellent and was well
worth the time. The graphics are truly amazing and the sound track was
pretty pleasant also. The preacher was in fact a thief.
1430480998833848320
2
Doc 2
stunning. The preacher was in fact an
excellent thief who had stolen the original manuscript of Hamlet from an
exhibit on the Riviera, where he also acquired his remarkable and
tan.
1430480998841188352
Relevant section of Solr schema:
DocId
Relevant section of Solr config:
explicit
100
ContentSearch
true
Content
150
40
100
70
0.5
[-\w ,/\n\"']{20,200}
Has anyone experienced this kind of behaviour before? Need some direction
for troubleshooting.
Soumya.
RE: Issue in search
You could write yourr query like q=filedname1:searchValue AND fieldName2:value OR fieldName3: Value Regards, Manas From: Suram [mailto:reactive...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wed 3/17/2010 12:44 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Issue in search In solr how can perform AND, OR, NOT search while querying the data -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Issue-in-search-tp27927828p27927828.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Issue in search
In solr how can perform AND, OR, NOT search while querying the data -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Issue-in-search-tp27927828p27927828.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
