RE: thanks for solr 4.1
Subscribed! Just integrating solr 4.1 in a corporate GIS architecture as we speak. Thanks! Guilherme Pires -Original Message- From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013 15:34 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: thanks for solr 4.1 Now this must be said, thanks for solr 4.1 (and lucene 4.1)! Great improvements compared to 4.0. After building the first 4.1 index I thought the index was broken, but had no error messages anywhere. Why I thought it was damaged? The index size went down from 167 GB (solr 4.0) to 115 GB (solr 4.1)!!! Will now move the new 4.1 index to testing stage and after it passes all testing it goes online. Can't wait to see the new stats. Regards, Bernd
Re: Thanks All
If you build it, they will come! On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, vybe3142 wrote: > I'm still puzzled that there are no readily available alternatives to using > the Tika based ExtractingRequestHandler in the situation where the input > data is plain UTF-8 text files that SOLR needs to injest and index. I may > need to look into defining a custom Request Handler if that's the right way > to go. > -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
Re: Thanks All
: To get this to work correctly, the following server side config was needed : (I started from a barebones solr config) : 1. Add apache-solr-cell-3.5.0.jar to the /lib directory (or : wherever solr can access jars) as this contains the class : ExtractingRequestHandler : 2. Add the appropriate handler for /update/extract in the solrconfig.xml : (this uses the ExtractingRequestHandler class). what barebones solr config did you start with? the example configs that ship with solr have included /update/extract since 1.4.0 -Hoss
Re: Thanks Robert!
+1 And thanks to you both for all your work on CommonGrams! Tom Burton-West Jason Rutherglen-2 wrote: > > Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It > helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak. > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Thanks-Robert%21-tp27460899p27472503.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Thanks Robert!
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It > helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak. > +1 Thank you so much Robert! -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Thanks Robert!
thanks, well All would be a little inaccurate... we still have one huge monster (Synonyms) remaining and some other smaller stuff: SOLR-1657 has a list with the finished stuff crossed-out. think WDF took a year off my life, but will take a second look now and see if i can resolve some more of these tokenstreams. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It > helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak. > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
RE: Thanks
Great site (fast from Canada), multilingual, hope you will get millions of ads quickly and share your findings of SOLR faceting performance (don't forget about SOLR HTTP-caching support!) I am currently developing similar in Canada, http://www.casaGURU.com (and hope to improve http://www.zoocasa.com) -Original Message- From: gwk [mailto:g...@eyefi.nl] Sent: August-27-09 8:04 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Thanks Hello, Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our website to something a little faster/prettier/maintainable-er. After some research we decided on using Solr and after indexing our data for the first time and trying some manual queries we were all amazed at the speed. This summer we started developing the new site and today we've gone live.You can see the site running at http://www.mysecondhome.eu (I don't mean to advertise, so feel free not to buy a house). I'd like to thank the people here for their help with lifting me from Solr-ignorance to Solr-seems-to-know-a-little-bit. We're running a nightly build of Solr 1.4 with SOLR-1240 applied for the dynamic facet count updates when using the sliders in the search screen. Again, thank you and if you have any suggestions or questions regarding our implementation, feel free to ask. Regards, gwk
Re: Thanks
This looks great! Congratulations! Feel free to add your site to the "Powered by Solr" page at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, gwk wrote: > Hello, > > Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our website > to something a little faster/prettier/maintainable-er. After some research > we decided on using Solr and after indexing our data for the first time and > trying some manual queries we were all amazed at the speed. This summer we > started developing the new site and today we've gone live.You can see the > site running at http://www.mysecondhome.eu (I don't mean to advertise, so > feel free not to buy a house). I'd like to thank the people here for their > help with lifting me from Solr-ignorance to Solr-seems-to-know-a-little-bit. > We're running a nightly build of Solr 1.4 with SOLR-1240 applied for the > dynamic facet count updates when using the sliders in the search screen. > > Again, thank you and if you have any suggestions or questions regarding our > implementation, feel free to ask. > > Regards, > > gwk > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Thanks
Dave Searle wrote: Hi Gwk, It's a nice clean site, easy to use and seems very fast, well done! How well does it do in regards to SEO though? I noticed there's a lot of ajax going on in the background to help speed things up for the user (love the sliders), but seems to be lacking structure for the search engines. I'm not sure if this is your intention or not, but you could massively increase the number of pages the crawlers see by extending your url rewrites to be a bit more static Hi Dave, Thanks for the reply, actually, we did think about SEO, turn off javascript in your browser and you'll see the site still works (at least, it's supposed to). We've added all AJAXy-interaction after we implemented the functionality to work without Javascript. So you'll get no nice fancy sliders but two drop-downs to select a range. Regards, gwk
RE: Thanks
Hi Gwk, It's a nice clean site, easy to use and seems very fast, well done! How well does it do in regards to SEO though? I noticed there's a lot of ajax going on in the background to help speed things up for the user (love the sliders), but seems to be lacking structure for the search engines. I'm not sure if this is your intention or not, but you could massively increase the number of pages the crawlers see by extending your url rewrites to be a bit more static i.e. http://www.mysecondhome.co.uk/search/country/France#/s?s=date_desc&p=1&t=object&ta=[]&pmin=0&pmax=%3E&country[]=France&apmin=0&apmax=%3E&samin=0&samax=%3E could become: http://www.mysecondhome.co.uk/search/country/France/region/Auvergne/minprice/20/maxprice/3/page/2 This is what we do with our solr implemented search system across all our sites, which in turn has increased general traffic and organic traffic (eg www.visordown.com, www.madeformums.com) Cheers Dave -Original Message- From: gwk [mailto:g...@eyefi.nl] Sent: 27 August 2009 13:04 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Thanks Hello, Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our website to something a little faster/prettier/maintainable-er. After some research we decided on using Solr and after indexing our data for the first time and trying some manual queries we were all amazed at the speed. This summer we started developing the new site and today we've gone live.You can see the site running at http://www.mysecondhome.eu (I don't mean to advertise, so feel free not to buy a house). I'd like to thank the people here for their help with lifting me from Solr-ignorance to Solr-seems-to-know-a-little-bit. We're running a nightly build of Solr 1.4 with SOLR-1240 applied for the dynamic facet count updates when using the sliders in the search screen. Again, thank you and if you have any suggestions or questions regarding our implementation, feel free to ask. Regards, gwk
