Re: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?!
Strings, especially if you sort, facet, etc, will be significantly more costly in terms of memory requirements. Doesn't mean you can't, just be aware of the fact... Best Erick On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:42 AM, stockii stock.jo...@googlemail.com wrote: thx =) i think i will save this as an string if ranges really works =) - --- System One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores, 1 Core with 45 Million Documents other Cores 200.000 - Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx - Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Schema-fieldType-y-m-d-tp3335359p3339160.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?!
thx =) i think i will save this as an string if ranges really works =) - --- System One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores, 1 Core with 45 Million Documents other Cores 200.000 - Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx - Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Schema-fieldType-y-m-d-tp3335359p3339160.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?!
Just add a bogus 0 timestamp after it when you index it. That is what we did. Dates are not stored or indexed as characters, anyway, so space would not be any different one way or the other. JRJ -Original Message- From: stockii [mailto:stock.jo...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:56 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?! is it possible to index a datefield in the format of y-m-d ? i dont need the timestamp. so i can save me some space. which ways exists to search with a complex date-filter !? - --- System One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores, 1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores 100.000 - Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx - Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Schema-fieldType-y-m-d-tp3335359p3335359.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?!
What we did was get the date from db, and stored it in a string fieldType in the format mmdd. It works fine for us, as range query works just fine. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Schema-fieldType-y-m-d-tp3335359p3336309.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Schema fieldType y-m-d ?!?!
If you don't need date-specific functions and/or faceting, you can store it as a int, like 20110914 and parse it in your application but I don't recommend... as a rule of thumb, dates should be stored as dates, the millenium bug (Y2K bug) was all about 'saving some space' remember?
