Re: Solr boolean operators

2011-01-13 Thread Xavier SCHEPLER 
Ok, thanks.
That's what I expected :D

> 
> From: dante stroe 
> Sent: Thu Jan 13 15:56:33 CET 2011
> To: 
> Subject: Re: Solr boolean operators
> 
> 
> To my understanding: in terms of the results that will be matched by your
> query ... it's the same. In terms of the score of the results  no,
> since, if you are using the first query, the documents that will match both
> the "a" and the "b" terms, will match higher then the ones matching just the
> "a" term.
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Xavier Schepler <
> xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > with the Lucene query syntax, is :
> >
> > a AND (a OR b)
> >
> > equivalent to :
> >
> > a
> >
> > (absorption)
> >
> > ?
> >


--
Tous les courriers électroniques émis depuis la messagerie
de Sciences Po doivent respecter des conditions d'usages.
Pour les consulter rendez-vous sur
http://www.ressources-numeriques.sciences-po.fr/confidentialite_courriel.htm

Re: Solr boolean operators

2011-01-13 Thread dante stroe 
To my understanding: in terms of the results that will be matched by your
query ... it's the same. In terms of the score of the results  no,
since, if you are using the first query, the documents that will match both
the "a" and the "b" terms, will match higher then the ones matching just the
"a" term.

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> with the Lucene query syntax, is :
>
> a AND (a OR b)
>
> equivalent to :
>
> a
>
> (absorption)
>
> ?
>

Solr boolean operators

2011-01-13 Thread Xavier Schepler 

Hi,

with the Lucene query syntax, is :

a AND (a OR b)

equivalent to :

a

(absorption)

?