Re: intersection of filter queries with raw query parser

2013-06-02 Thread Mikhail Khludnev 
Hello Sascha,

I propose to call raw parser from standard one by nested query syntax
http://searchhub.org/2009/03/31/nested-queries-in-solr/

Regards.


On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:

 Hi folks,

 is it possible to use the raw query parser with a disjunctive filter
 query? Say, I have a field 'foo' and two values 'v1' and 'v2' (the field
 values are free text and can contain any character). What I want is to
 retrieve all documents satisying fq=foo:(v1 OR v2). In case only one field
 (v1) is given, the query fq={!raw f=foo}v1 works as expected. But how can I
 formulate the filter query (with the raw query parser) in case two values
 are provided.

 The same question was posted on Stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/**
 questions/5637675/solr-query-**with-raw-data-and-union-**
 multiple-facet-valueshttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/5637675/solr-query-with-raw-data-and-union-multiple-facet-values)
 two years ago. But there was only the advice to give up using the raw query
 parser which is not what I want to do.

 Thanks in advance,
 Sascha




-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

http://www.griddynamics.com
 mkhlud...@griddynamics.com

intersection of filter queries with raw query parser

2013-05-31 Thread Sascha Szott 

Hi folks,

is it possible to use the raw query parser with a disjunctive filter 
query? Say, I have a field 'foo' and two values 'v1' and 'v2' (the field 
values are free text and can contain any character). What I want is to 
retrieve all documents satisying fq=foo:(v1 OR v2). In case only one 
field (v1) is given, the query fq={!raw f=foo}v1 works as expected. But 
how can I formulate the filter query (with the raw query parser) in case 
two values are provided.


The same question was posted on Stackoverflow 
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5637675/solr-query-with-raw-data-and-union-multiple-facet-values) 
two years ago. But there was only the advice to give up using the raw 
query parser which is not what I want to do.


Thanks in advance,
Sascha