Re: string field max size

[Vincenzo D'Amore]

Thanks Erick for this last confirmation. I've at the end I've used the
standard "text_ws":


  

  


And the field



On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:54 AM Erick Erickson 
wrote:

> bq. What I do not understand is what happens to the Analyzers, Tokenizers,
> and
> Filters in the indexing chain
>
> They are irrelevant. The analysis chain is only executed when
> indexed=true.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Sep 5, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:
> >
> > What I do not understand is what happens to the Analyzers, Tokenizers,
> and
> > Filters in the indexing chain
>
>

-- 
Vincenzo D'Amore

Re: string field max size

[Erick Erickson]

bq. What I do not understand is what happens to the Analyzers, Tokenizers, and
Filters in the indexing chain

They are irrelevant. The analysis chain is only executed when indexed=true. 

Best,
Erick

> On Sep 5, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:
> 
> What I do not understand is what happens to the Analyzers, Tokenizers, and
> Filters in the indexing chain

Re: string field max size

[Jitendra soni]

I agree, stored=true and indexed =false should resolve this size issue.

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 21:54, Erick Erickson  wrote:

> Use a text field with stored=true and indexed=false? That'll allow you to
> return it...
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 07:04 Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > sorry for the silly question, I need to store in Solr a string field
> larger
> > than 32k (index="false").
> >
> > Given that storing field larger than 32k rises an exception:
> > "DocValuesField "filterQuery" is too large, must be <= 32766", I thought
> to
> > use predefined type text_ws.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks in advance and best regards,
> > Vincenzo
> >
> > --
> > Vincenzo D'Amore
> >
>
-- 
Thanks
Jitendra

Re: string field max size

[Vincenzo D'Amore]

Thanks Erick for the prompt answer.
What I do not understand is what happens to the Analyzers, Tokenizers, and
Filters in the indexing chain.
Are they executed or not? Well, answering to my own question I think no,
but so what's the difference between string and text when they are not
indexed?
Just the way how are they stored and retrieved?


On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:54 PM Erick Erickson 
wrote:

> Use a text field with stored=true and indexed=false? That'll allow you to
> return it...
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 07:04 Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > sorry for the silly question, I need to store in Solr a string field
> larger
> > than 32k (index="false").
> >
> > Given that storing field larger than 32k rises an exception:
> > "DocValuesField "filterQuery" is too large, must be <= 32766", I thought
> to
> > use predefined type text_ws.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks in advance and best regards,
> > Vincenzo
> >
> > --
> > Vincenzo D'Amore
> >
>


-- 
Vincenzo D'Amore

Re: string field max size

[Erick Erickson]

Use a text field with stored=true and indexed=false? That'll allow you to
return it...

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 07:04 Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> sorry for the silly question, I need to store in Solr a string field larger
> than 32k (index="false").
>
> Given that storing field larger than 32k rises an exception:
> "DocValuesField "filterQuery" is too large, must be <= 32766", I thought to
> use predefined type text_ws.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks in advance and best regards,
> Vincenzo
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
>

string field max size

[Vincenzo D'Amore]

Hi all,

sorry for the silly question, I need to store in Solr a string field larger
than 32k (index="false").

Given that storing field larger than 32k rises an exception:
"DocValuesField "filterQuery" is too large, must be <= 32766", I thought to
use predefined type text_ws.

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance and best regards,
Vincenzo

-- 
Vincenzo D'Amore