Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/embedded
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: If the problem is overflow of the image, shouldn't the extra variable in each config file be bumped instead of changing a unit? Sorry for the messy commit. I just changed the -b line the way I did because I'm not sure where extra comes from and version 1.37 broke every img that I tried to build. In such case, asking comitter (or filing PR) would be better. I did, and heard no objections to my change. As author of 1.37, just so it's clear that I didn't approve this commit, I don't recall being asked about it at all.
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/embedded
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Jared McNeill wrote: On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: If the problem is overflow of the image, shouldn't the extra variable in each config file be bumped instead of changing a unit? Sorry for the messy commit. I just changed the -b line the way I did because I'm not sure where extra comes from and version 1.37 broke every img that I tried to build. In such case, asking comitter (or filing PR) would be better. I did, and heard no objections to my change. As author of 1.37, just so it's clear that I didn't approve this commit, I don't recall being asked about it at all. I asked you directly several times on IRC and you didn't reply, though you were replying to others. I figured you didn't care. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/embedded
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:35:03 -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Jared McNeill wrote: As author of 1.37, just so it's clear that I didn't approve this commit, I don't recall being asked about it at all. I asked you directly several times on IRC and you didn't reply, though you were replying to others. I figured you didn't care. IRC is not an official or reliable communication channel, it's a bad idea to assume that lack of reaction on IRC means anything. -uwe
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/embedded
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Valery Ushakov wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:35:03 -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Jared McNeill wrote: As author of 1.37, just so it's clear that I didn't approve this commit, I don't recall being asked about it at all. I asked you directly several times on IRC and you didn't reply, though you were replying to others. I figured you didn't care. IRC is not an official or reliable communication channel, it's a bad idea to assume that lack of reaction on IRC means anything. Seeing as how I didn't revert someone else's commit and I fixed a build break after reading the man pages and thought I wasn't actually committing any egregious errors, why are we still talking about this? I did fix my commit message to something more descriptive later. Sorry for that. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte
Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/embedded
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:55:10 -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Valery Ushakov wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:35:03 -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Jared McNeill wrote: As author of 1.37, just so it's clear that I didn't approve this commit, I don't recall being asked about it at all. I asked you directly several times on IRC and you didn't reply, though you were replying to others. I figured you didn't care. IRC is not an official or reliable communication channel, it's a bad idea to assume that lack of reaction on IRC means anything. Seeing as how I didn't revert someone else's commit and I fixed a build break after reading the man pages and thought I wasn't actually committing any egregious errors, why are we still talking about this? My remark was not about your commit, but about your assumption that IRC is a relibale channel. -uwe
