Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2021-10-07 Thread Rin Okuyama 

Oops, forgot to mention: No binary changes.

On 2021/10/07 18:58, Rin Okuyama wrote:

Module Name:src
Committed By:   rin
Date:   Thu Oct  7 09:58:27 UTC 2021

Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpufunc_asm_armv5_ec.S

Log Message:
Reduce diff with cpufunc_asm_armv5.S, from which this file was derived.


To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/sys/arch/arm/arm/cpufunc_asm_armv5_ec.S

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2020-11-11 Thread Rin Okuyama 

On 2020/11/12 6:52, matthew green wrote:

"Rin Okuyama" writes:

Module Name:src
Committed By:   rin
Date:   Tue Nov 10 21:40:07 UTC 2020

Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpu_exec.c

Log Message:
Test (epp->ep_esch->es_emul != _netbsd) instead of


nice, this is a step forward.

an optimisation on it could be to remove this test entirely
if neither MODULAR or COMAPT_NETBSD32 are set, as it will
always be false there.


Ah, yes. I will commit after some test. Thanks!

rin

re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2020-11-11 Thread matthew green 
"Rin Okuyama" writes:
> Module Name:  src
> Committed By: rin
> Date: Tue Nov 10 21:40:07 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
>   src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpu_exec.c
>
> Log Message:
> Test (epp->ep_esch->es_emul != _netbsd) instead of

nice, this is a step forward.

an optimisation on it could be to remove this test entirely
if neither MODULAR or COMAPT_NETBSD32 are set, as it will
always be false there.

thanks.


.mrg.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2013-03-09 Thread David Laight 
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
 Module Name:  src
 Committed By: mlelstv
 Date: Sat Mar  9 10:10:45 UTC 2013
 
 Modified Files:
   src/sys/arch/arm/arm: disksubr_acorn.c
 
 Log Message:
 Errors are supposed to be negative errno numbers, not -1 which is interpreted
 as EPERM.

Hmmm... NetBSD usually uses +ve errno values.

David

-- 
David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2012-12-27 Thread Matt Thomas 

On Dec 27, 2012, at 7:48 PM, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:

 Module Name:  src
 Committed By: msaitoh
 Date: Fri Dec 28 03:48:00 UTC 2012
 
 Modified Files:
   src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpufunc.c
 
 Log Message:
 Enable DCache Streaming Switch and Write Allocate.
 This change improve system performance significantly.

How does this affect L2 and DMA?

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2012-12-27 Thread Masanobu SAITOH 

Hi, matt.

(2012/12/28 14:10), Matt Thomas wrote:


On Dec 27, 2012, at 7:48 PM, SAITOH Masanobu wrote:


Module Name:src
Committed By:   msaitoh
Date:   Fri Dec 28 03:48:00 UTC 2012

Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpufunc.c

Log Message:
Enable DCache Streaming Switch and Write Allocate.
This change improve system performance significantly.


How does this affect L2 and DMA?


Both are not affected.

--
---
SAITOH Masanobu (msai...@execsw.org
 msai...@netbsd.org)

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/arm/arm

2012-12-23 Thread David Laight 
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:26:21PM +, Matt Thomas wrote:
 Module Name:  src
 Committed By: matt
 Date: Sun Dec 23 13:26:21 UTC 2012
 
 Modified Files:
   src/sys/arch/arm/arm: cpu_in_cksum_fold.S
 
 Log Message:
 Conditional execution still takes one cycle per skipped instruction.
 branch to unlikely cases instead of conditionally skipping them.

Or more for 'ldm' and 'stm' - esp. I think on strongarm!

Conditional execution might also be a full pipeline stall, rather
than a branch which is likely (hopefully) to be predicted correctly.

David

-- 
David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk