[Spacewalk-devel] Full spacewalk dev workstation causes Invalid SSL certificate error
Hello,
I'm trying to setup the full developer workstation as per the wiki at
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/DevelopmentWorkstationSetup.
However, after I run the sudo ant install-devel step, I receive the
error below on starting osa-dispatcher.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Starting spacewalk services...
Initializing jabberd processes ...
Starting router: [ OK ]
Starting sm: [ OK ]
Starting c2s: [ OK ]
Starting s2s: [ OK ]
Starting tomcat6: [ OK ]
Waiting for tomcat to be ready ...
Starting httpd:[ OK ]
Starting osa-dispatcher: Spacewalk 10779 2016/06/03 15:07:32 +01:00: ('Invalid
SSL certificate:', Unable to read file
/var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT)
[ OK ]
Starting rhn-search...
Starting cobbler daemon: [ OK ]
Starting RHN Taskomatic...
Done.
Cheers,
Laurence.
Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer
Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605
Oracle Linux
Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Full spacewalk dev workstation causes Invalid SSL certificate error
Thanks for the reply, Jan.
The cert file is where it used to be and it looks to me that the
install-devel step modifies some parts of /var/www/html, but then copies
back pub.
The certificate looks to be exactly the same as it was before the
install-devel step and is where /etc/rhn/rhn.conf expects it to be.
I have checked that the setfacl commands executed correctly, and have
even tried regenerating the certificate, but to no avail.
A rollback and fresh install of spacewalk and the git repo exhibits the
same behaviour.
Any ideas?
Many thanks,
Laurence
[root@lrochfor-swdev-1 ~]# grep ssl /etc/rhn/rhn.conf
db_ssl_enabled =
web.ssl_available = 1
osa-dispatcher.osa_ssl_cert = /var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
[root@lrochfor-swdev-1 ~]# ls -l /var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5465 Jun 3 14:08
/var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
[root@lrochfor-swdev-1 ~]# ls -l /var/www/html.old/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5465 Jun 3 14:08
/var/www/html.old/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
[root@lrochfor-swdev-1 ~]# diff /var/www/html.old/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
/var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
[root@lrochfor-swdev-1 ~]# diff /var/www/html.old/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
/var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
Jan Dobes writes:
> If it happens after running ant install-devel, the script probably
> breaks something in path /var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT
>
> According to file java/buildconf/build-webapp.xml line 159 it renames
> /var/www/html to /var/www/html.old . (I have no idea how this works,
> this development workstation setup code should be reviewed.)
>
> Try to find correct path to RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT and update
> parameter 'osa-dispatcher.osa_ssl_cert' in /etc/rhn/rhn.conf to point to
> it. Or copy the certificate into expected path.
>
> On 6.6.2016 11:52 Laurence Rochfort wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to setup the full developer workstation as per the wiki at
>> https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/DevelopmentWorkstationSetup.
>>
>> However, after I run the sudo ant install-devel step, I receive the
>> error below on starting osa-dispatcher.
>>
>> Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Starting spacewalk services...
>> Initializing jabberd processes ...
>> Starting router: [ OK ]
>> Starting sm: [ OK ]
>> Starting c2s: [ OK ]
>> Starting s2s: [ OK ]
>> Starting tomcat6: [ OK ]
>> Waiting for tomcat to be ready ...
>> Starting httpd:[ OK ]
>> Starting osa-dispatcher: Spacewalk 10779 2016/06/03 15:07:32 +01:00:
>> ('Invalid SSL certificate:', Unable to read file
>> /var/www/html/pub/RHN-ORG-TRUSTED-SSL-CERT)
>> [ OK ]
>> Starting rhn-search...
>> Starting cobbler daemon: [ OK ]
>> Starting RHN Taskomatic...
>> Done.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Laurence.
>>
>> Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer
>> Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605
>> Oracle Linux
>>
>> Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom
>>
>> ___
>> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
>> Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
>>
--
Cheers,
Laurence.
Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer
Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605
Oracle Linux
Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
[Spacewalk-devel] Development workstation setup
Hi all, I'm trying to get a dev environment working for Spacewalk by following https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/wiki/DevelopmentWorkstationSetup The "Poor Man's" instructions for a system running Tomcat 7 states: "FIXME: This is not working yet. Figure out what needs to be changed to make it work." Are there updated instructions for Tomcat 7 anywhere? If I follow the poor man's instructions on Oracle Linux 7, then at the ant install-tomcat step I receive the following jmock errors: "Test.java:33: error: package org.jmock does not exist" What's the current best environment and steps for a SW dev setup? Cheers, Laurence. Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605 Oracle Linux Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
[Spacewalk-devel] "Tracing a page" link broken on Wiki
Hi guys, FYI, the "Tracing a page" on the github wiki is broken; it just returns you to the wiki home page. https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/wiki/TracingaPage Cheers, Laurence. Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605 Oracle Linux Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
Re: [Spacewalk-devel] "Tracing a page" link broken on Wiki
Grant Gainey writes: > I re-extracted this page from the last Trac database backup., using > trac2github, and committed it to the wiki - it's visible now. No need for a > BZ (altho no worries if you've already opened one!) Awesome, thanks all! Cheers, Laurence. Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605 Oracle Linux Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
[Spacewalk-devel] Test schema data
Hi all, Is there a sample data schema available to use for testing? Or maybe some test data generation script? Cheers, Laurence. Laurence Rochfort | Principal Oracle Linux Developer Phone: +44 118 924 5629 | Mobile: +44 7867 908 605 Oracle Linux Building 520, Oracle Parkway | Reading | Berkshire | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Some 2.8.x version RPMs list in 2.9 COPR project
On 26 April 2019 at 13:46 BST, Michael Mraka wrote: > Laurence Rochfort: >> Hi all, >> >> I was looking at the COPR project for Spacewalk 2.9 and noticed that >> some of the spacewalk-* packages have a 2.8.x version, whereas in the >> SPACEWALK-2.9 git tag they have a 2.9.x version. >> >> The main spacewalk package stands out in particular. >> >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.9/ >> >> I noticed the following packages have different version numbers from >> git: >> >> spacewalk-proxy-installer2.8.6-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> spacewalk-config 2.8.5-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> spacewalk-setup-postgresql 2.8.4-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> spacewalk-proxy-selinux 2.8.3-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> perl-Satcon 2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled >> - >> spacewalk2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled >> - >> spacewalk-proxy-docs 2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> spacewalk-proxy-html 2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded >> Disabled- >> >> Could somebody please confirm if the correct versions have been built on >> COPR? > > Hello Laurence, > > these versions are ok. There has been no change during Spacewalk 2.9 > development in these packages. If you look into .spec you can see > Version: 2.9.0 here but it is just a result of an automatic version > bump so the first real change in the package would increased version to > 2.9.1. > > Let's check latest tagged versions: > $ cd spacewalk.git > $ git checksout SPACEWALK-2.9 > $ for t in spacewalk-proxy-installer spacewalk-config > spacewalk-setup-postgresql spacewalk-proxy-selinux perl-Satcon spacewalk-2 > spacewalk-proxy-docs spacewalk-proxy-html ; do git tag | grep $t | tail -1 ; > done > spacewalk-proxy-installer-2.8.6-1 > spacewalk-config-2.8.5-1 > spacewalk-setup-postgresql-2.8.4-1 > spacewalk-proxy-selinux-2.8.3-1 > perl-Satcon-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-proxy-docs-2.8.2-1 > spacewalk-proxy-html-2.8.2-1 Thanks for the explanation, Michael. I do wonder if having the main Spacewalk 2.9 package have a version of 2.8 is a little confusing for a sys admin who's not so familiar with Spacewalk? If I were to ask yum which version of Spacewalk I have installed and it says 2.8, or the main package version didn't match all the others, then it might be confusing and cause me to try to upgrade? Just a thought. -- Cheers, Laurence. ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
[Spacewalk-devel] Some 2.8.x version RPMs list in 2.9 COPR project
Hi all, I was looking at the COPR project for Spacewalk 2.9 and noticed that some of the spacewalk-* packages have a 2.8.x version, whereas in the SPACEWALK-2.9 git tag they have a 2.9.x version. The main spacewalk package stands out in particular. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.9/ I noticed the following packages have different version numbers from git: spacewalk-proxy-installer 2.8.6-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- spacewalk-config2.8.5-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- spacewalk-setup-postgresql 2.8.4-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- spacewalk-proxy-selinux 2.8.3-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- perl-Satcon 2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled - spacewalk 2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled - spacewalk-proxy-docs2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- spacewalk-proxy-html2.8.2-1.fc2814 days ago succeeded Disabled- Could somebody please confirm if the correct versions have been built on COPR? Many thanks. Oh, I noticed that the repo link on the following page is wrong: https://spacewalkproject.github.io/howtoinstall.html States: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/groups/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.9/ Should be: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.9/ -- Cheers, Laurence. ___ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
