Actually, no.  The sender-blacklist-* and recipient-blacklist-* filters operate 
on different data from the header-blacklist-* filters.  The reason is because 
the sender and recipient addresses are given during the SMTP protocol and 
aren't part of the message itself -- the addresses you see in your mail client 
are the From and To entries from the message header.  The first paragraph here 
explains in a little more detail:
        http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS

Put another way, the sender address doesn't have to match the "From" address 
visible in the mail client -- well-behaved mail clients make them the same, but 
that's a courtesy and not a requirement.  The Reply-To address is part of the 
message header and, again, is only a convention used by well-behaved clients.  
If you've ever been Bcc'd on a message, you've seen this in action -- the 
sender's mail client gave your address as a recipient but didn't put your 
address on the "To" line in the message header.

-- Sam Clippinger




On Sep 13, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users 
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:

> Sam,
> 
> 
> On 2015-09-14 11:38, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure I understand your question... if the Reply-To
>> address is always the same, you should be able to block it using the
>> header blacklist filter.
> 
> 
> Ah . . OK - I will try that but doesn't that mean that:
> 
>  sender-blacklist-entry
> 
> is redundant - ie:
> 
>  header-blacklist-entry
> 
> should cover everything?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil.
> 
> 
>> If you're wanting to compare the Reply-To
>> address to the From address or the sender address, spamdyke doesn't
>> have that ability.
> 
> 
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>> On Sep 13, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
>> <spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
>>> People,
>>> One variety of spam that is successfully delivered to me has a
>>> different "From:" addresses but the same "Reply-To:" address - I
>>> can't see a way of blocking these mails in the conf file via the
>>> "Reply-To:" address - is it possible?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Phil.
>>> --
>>> Philip Rhoades
>>> PO Box 896
>>> Cowra NSW 2794
>>> Australia
>>> E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> -- 
> Philip Rhoades
> 
> PO Box 896
> Cowra  NSW  2794
> Australia
> E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to