Re: HMAC-256 vs HMAC-SHA256 for openid.assoc_type

2007-10-31 Thread Josh Hoyt 
On 10/30/07, Manger, James H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It was HMAC-SHA256 in draft 9 (10 Sep 2007), but had changed to HMAC-256 
 in draft 10 (13 Oct 2007). The change is looking more like a typo.

Indeed, this is an error in the text. It's intended to be HMAC-SHA256.

Josh
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

RE: HMAC-256 vs HMAC-SHA256 for openid.assoc_type

2007-10-30 Thread Manger, James H 
It was “HMAC-SHA256” in draft 9 (10 Sep 2007), but had changed to “HMAC-256” in 
draft 10 (13 Oct 2007). The change is looking more like a typo.
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs