Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It is time to publish this one. Nits ---- In section 2, "The flooding mechanisms of link state IGPs fits very well with label stacking on ingress" while I do not disagree with the statement, it is somehow out of the blue: either explain shortly why or delete the sentence if so obvious. Note: or even keep it like it is now. Section 2.5.1, binary numbers 100 and 110 should probably explicitly qualified as binary representations. Some typos in name or spacing in sections 6 and 7 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
