RE: Transition from Outside to Inside

2011-07-13 Thread Bill Brooks
Of course the Annex is not the body as the TC already knows, and of course
this is a pretty minor point, but fixing this, even as a change to the
Annex, is not that complex.  And why, if this is how the TC rationalizes
their opinion, would they address this topic in relation to location of the
piping with respect to the foundation?   I generally use the one joint
rule which would limit the amount of underground piping to less than one
length and thereby limiting the height of the flange above the floor (just
as is shown in A.10.6.5), but I have seen multiple pieces of ductile inside
as well.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 4:47 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Transition from Outside to Inside

I agree with Mark. Some folks (including the TC at the ROP meeting)  
seem to think it is acceptable based on 13:A.10.6.5 showing part of  
the underground pipe extending above the floor.  They seem to have  
ignored that the Figure is ductile so doesn't address plastic and seem  
to have forgotten that the listing for underground plastic pipe  
applies to it being underground.  As soon as it is exposed (whether in  
a trench or as a transition piece above the floor) it has to be  
acceptable as an above ground pipe. Needless to say, this issue will  
be addressed again at the ROC meeting.

Roland

On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Mark Sornsin wrote:

 Bill - I'm going to go on a limb a bit and suggest there is no  
 maximum height.

 There's underground pipe (CH. 10), above-ground pipe (CH. 6) and the  
 transition piece (23.1.6.1.1). It is implied that underground pipe  
 is only underground. An aggressive AHJ or EOR may argue that the  
 flange must be located at the floor level - so no underground pipe  
 is above-ground and vice versa. I would suggest that it really only  
 matters when dealing with plastic underground transitioning to above- 
 ground pipe. No plastic pipe should be allowed above ground, so the  
 transition should start below grade. I always spec' ductile iron  
 into the building. This meets the intent of 23.1.6.1.1 as a  
 transition.  We normally shoot for the transition to the above- 
 ground pipe to occur at 6 to 12 inches above the floor, but there is  
 nothing in 13 that mandates any particular height.

 Mark A. Sornsin, PE| Fire Protection Engineer
 Ulteig Engineers, Inc.| Fargo, ND
 mark.sorn...@ulteig.com



___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: QR sprinklers and clouds

2011-07-13 Thread Thom
As I see it QR should be used for both above and at the cloud. UNLESS this
is a renovation of an existing system.

My reasoning is, the space below the cloud is LH, then why is not the space
above the cloud LH? LH=QR sprinkler heads.

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)