Re: Intumescent Steel Protection (Not Sprinkler Question)

2019-02-14 Thread Steve Leyton
This has been an accepted practice for years and the use of Spray-Applied Fire 
Resistive Materials (SFRM) is addressed in the building code. Monokote was the 
best known brand for a long, long time but there are several products in use 
now.



Steve Leyton

(Sent from my phone; please excuse typos and voice text corruptions.)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


RE: [EXTERNAL] Intumescent Steel Protection (Not Sprinkler Question)

2019-02-14 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL
Yes, for passive fire protection, intumescent coatings are the preferred 
method.  There are other spray on coatings but intumescent has less bulk than 
say cementitious type coatings.  Intumescent coatings tend to be less labor 
intensive than boxing and wrapping thus reducing overall costs for complex 
installations.  Also GB membrane type of protection tends to become less 
reliable over time especially in occupancies where renovation work may occur 
out into the future.  People remove it, penetrate it etc. and don’t repair the 
impairments.  Passive fire protection is like any other system, it needs to be 
inspected after construction or repair work and maintained in order for it to 
be effective.  Trouble is, like sprinklers, since it’s not related to comfort 
or revenue generation, it is often long forgotten and not maintained.

Any coating causes more challenges to the contractors during construction since 
if you are hanging from coated bar joist for example, the material often has to 
be chipped off or ground away, hanging clamps placed and then the coating 
repaired.  If you have to change anything, it’s a repeat and all that costs 
money.

Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead – Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 | 
craig.pr...@jacobs.com<mailto:craig.pr...@jacobs.com> | 
www.jacobs.com<http://www.jacobs.com/>

From: Sprinklerforum  On Behalf 
Of Bill Brooks
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 8:46 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Intumescent Steel Protection (Not Sprinkler Question)

I apologize in advance for this question, and I invite off-line responses.  I 
also admit to not being 100% up-to-date on construction trends.  However, if 
there is a group who would be able to answer this it would be you.

I’m participating in a design for a 2 story office building with absolutely no 
special features, with the exception that the construction type is Type IIA.  I 
suggested using a gypsumboard membrane protection approach but the owner is 
steering the project to use of intumescent coating for steel structure, 
including bar joists – coatings shop-applied and touched up in the field after 
making connections.  I’ve been told this technique is becoming more prevalent.

Any feedback is welcome.

Bill Brooks
bill.bro...@brooksfpe.com<mailto:bill.bro...@brooksfpe.com>

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell



NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information 
that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


Intumescent Steel Protection (Not Sprinkler Question)

2019-02-14 Thread Bill Brooks
I apologize in advance for this question, and I invite off-line responses.  I 
also admit to not being 100% up-to-date on construction trends.  However, if 
there is a group who would be able to answer this it would be you.

 

I’m participating in a design for a 2 story office building with absolutely no 
special features, with the exception that the construction type is Type IIA.  I 
suggested using a gypsumboard membrane protection approach but the owner is 
steering the project to use of intumescent coating for steel structure, 
including bar joists – coatings shop-applied and touched up in the field after 
making connections.  I’ve been told this technique is becoming more prevalent.

 

Any feedback is welcome.

 

Bill Brooks

bill.bro...@brooksfpe.com

 

William N. Brooks, P.E.

Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.

372 Wilett Drive

Severna Park, MD 21146-1904

410-544-3620

410-544-3032 FAX

412-400-6528 Cell

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org