[spyder] Re: Permanently visible index column in DataFrame viewer
On 2016-10-19 19:04, Jitse Niesen wrote: > I suggest you submit a feature request on the Spyder github page at > https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder . Done: https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/3562 . Thanks for your answer! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[spyder] Permanently visible index column in DataFrame viewer
Hello, I am using Spyder 3.0.0b5. I notice the following in the DataFrame viewer: When scrolling down, the row of column names (df.columns) stay permanently visible. However, when scrolling right, the index column (df.index) scrolls off to the left. Is it possible to keep the index visible during scrolling? Best regards, Robert -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [spyder] Sets in variable explorer ?
Hello! On Thursday, December 6, 2012 at 4:50:55 AM UTC+1, Carlos Córdoba wrote: [...] > Please fill an issue in our issue tracker so that we don't forget to try > to improve the situation in the future. > (Since I also just stumbled over this:) For the record, this was filed as https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/2355 some time ago. Best regards, Robert -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [spyder] Re: Spyder 2.3.2 from Anaconda is remarkably slower than Spyder 2.3.1
Hello Carlos, you wrote: By the way, I added one change regarding closing Spyder on Windows in 2.3.2. Could you comment lines 2129 and 2130 of spyderlib/spyder.py to see if that helps? Your guess was right - commenting out the lines elif e.args[0] == enotsock: continue from your commit d0bfa45 fixes the issue for me! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups spyder group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[spyder] Re: Spyder 2.3.2 from Anaconda is remarkably slower than Spyder 2.3.1
I wrote:
Note that I additionally see a _very_ slow close ( 30 sec) after running
a certain script. I will try to minimize this script and post it as a test
case.
My test case is even simpler: make a script with 100 lines of
print('helloworld'), open this in Spyder, then close Spyder.
With Spyder 2.3.2 (from WinPython-64bit-3.4.2.3) I saw:
In three of five tries closing took 16 seconds until the Spyder window
disappeared, the other two took 30 and 33 seconds.
The python.exe process takes up to 14% of my 8-core CPU, until 2 to 20
seconds after the Spyder window has closed.
Spyder 2.3.1 (from WinPython-64bit-3.4.2.2) always closes instantly.
Btw., during these tests my machine has more than 4 GB RAM free.
I looked over the Spyder 2.3.2 changelog [1], but did not notice anything
that might be related.
--Robert
[1]
https://bitbucket.org/spyder-ide/spyderlib/commits/4653cc73a35199ce5c1c6a5637ccdba0f41671e8?at=2.3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
spyder group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[spyder] Re: Spyder 2.3.2 from Anaconda is remarkably slower than Spyder 2.3.1
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 at 3:49:31 AM UTC+1, Srinivasan Rajaraman wrote: [...] when I updated Spyder to 2.3.2, I notice that the startup and exit time is remarkably more than before. I also see this, starting at WinPython-64bit-3.4.2.3, as described here: https://github.com/winpython/winpython/issues/42 . Note that I additionally see a _very_ slow close ( 30 sec) after running a certain script. I will try to minimize this script and post it as a test case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups spyder group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to spyderlib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to spyderlib@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
