On [Fri, 10.12.2010 06:17], Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Jan <janus...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 08.12.2010 20:44, schrieb Richard Hipp:
> > > Now that foreign key constraints are enforced natively, why would you
> > want
> > > to have a list of them? Why should the foreign_key_list pragma continue
> > to
> > > consume code space and developer maintenance time?
> >
> > Was this only a rhetorical question?
> > Or is there a small chance that this pragma will survive?
> >
>
> I relented on this two days ago. See
> http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/info/d399230aae for the check-in. Version
> 3.7.5 will list PRAGMA foreign_key_list as fully supported. (sigh)
>
That are great news. Thanks for continuing this feature!
--
Daniel Vogelbacher
----
web: http://daniel.vogelbacher.name
irc: cytrinox @ (freenode|ircnet|quakenet)
www.informave.org
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
