On 8 January 2016 at 01:47, Stephen Chrzanowski <pontia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally wish the reverse. I wish that these interpreted language > engines would incorporate the SQLite code directly into their own existence > to avoid having to write wrappers to begin with, except for those wrappers > where their method name is "DatabaseOpen" and I prefer "OpenDatabase". > > SQLite has been around for years, and "R", PHP, Java, Perl, and all these > other interpreted new and old style languages have never bothered to > incorporate this public domain database engine within itself. It isn't > like the maintainers of these languages don't know it doesn't exist, and if > they didn't, then my god they gotta get out from under that rock. Most web > browsers use SQLite for crying out loud. > > For a few years, I've considered taking the entire amalgamation and porting > it to Pascal (Delphi/FPC) so I have exactly zero reliance on DLLs. No > worries about OBJ files, no worries about dependencies, I just include a > unit and my app is now database aware. I know 386 assembly, and I can > always read up on other specifications if I needed to. My problem is that > gaming gets in the way. > > My 2016 wish list for SQLite is that all developers who write for, or use > directly or indirectly, any database engine out on the market has a safe > and happy 2016 and beyond. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > Haven't the mORMot guys already done this - http://synopse.info/fossil/wiki?name=SQLite3+Framework? I think they have a means of compiling sqlite access directly into Delphi and Freepascal. -- Frank Church ======================= http://devblog.brahmancreations.com _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
