1. "Better" is a relative term. Since the effort of porting changes from my version to mono is non-trivial, I imagine that mono will be slower to adapt to newer SQLite releases in favor of stabilizing the port. So you might get a more stable, less frequently updated version from Mono. 2. Ties in with #1. Traditionally I've updated more frequently than mono and adopted newer SQLite builds faster. 3. Marek Habersack ported the code around February of 2007. I can't recall exactly what version he ported. 4. They have to use the stock sqlite library, so their changes were to call the native sqlite api directly, and had to remove some of the features I added to the core. They also can't combine the native library and assembly into a single module. 5. Unsure of this. 6. No, though I have been insanely busy lately and haven't been able to devote as much time to SQLite as I have in the past.
You can browse the SVN sources for Mono.Data.SQLite here: http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewcvs/trunk/mcs/class/Mono.Data.Sqlite/Mon o.Data.Sqlite_2.0/?rev=90845#dirlist That'll give you an idea how often its updated. BTW: I finally got around to posting an update today. http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com Robert -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Ron P Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:36 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: [sqlite] .net wrappers - mono vs. phxsoftware Denis pointed another poster to the url below, which I was unaware of: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteWrappers I'm currently using the phxsoftware ado.net 2.0 wrapper for sqlite by Robert Simpson, which is excellent. However, I am surprised to see that the Mono project recently imported Simpson's code (http://www.mono-project.com/SQLite). This begs the following questions: 1. Which project will be better maintained in the long run? 2. Which maintainer will continue to improve the project, and at what frequency? 3. When did Mono merge in the phx code base? (Simpson's latest build is Dec 2007.) 4. Did Mono make any significant changes to the phx project? 5. Will the Mono project try to stay synchronized with phx? 6. Is Simpson passing the baton? Does anyone have any insight into this? Also, I can check this myself later, but does anyone know off the top of their head how much test coverage the phx code base has, if any? RW PS. Robert - if you are reading this list - THANK YOU. ----------Tyco Electronics---------- Ron Wilson, S/W Systems Engineer III 434.455.6453 tycoelectronics.com ------------------------------------ Important: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
