Re: Squid-dev subscription

2006-10-23 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 21:53 +0200, Gernot Tenchio wrote:

 My name is Gernot. I'm a developer from Germany and I'm interested in getting
 the ICAP part of Squid to work. Currently I'm tried to get things working
 with Squid's 2.6er icap branch and with Squid3 as well. Both versions worked
 more or less for me, but I think it (c|sh)ould be improved.

Hi Gernot,

Glad you are interested in ICAP. FWIW, quite a few ICAP bugs have been
recently fixed on squid3-icap branch of Squid CVS tree. You may want to
use that branch as a base for your work.

Currently, I am not aware of any serious ICAP-specific bugs except for
OPTIONS response processing, but I am sure there are a few. If you know
of any ICAP problems, please post here or, better, submit a bug report.
I may be able to help.

An avalanche of bug reports notwithstanding, I hope squid3-icap will be
ready for HEAD integration by the end of this week. My longer-term goal
is to make Squid3/ICAP stable for the Squid3 stable release.

HTH,

Alex.




Re: Squid-dev subscription

2006-10-23 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 20:50 +0200, Gernot Tenchio wrote:
 On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:22:20 +0200
 Moshe Beeri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi All Squiders,
  
  In the following couple of weeks I will post some new features that are
  needed for parental control, as well as context connectivity from
  req_mod to resp_mod.
  But the major change I made is to add the ability to direct response to
  client in case that classification is already known at req_mod.
  
  The changes I made are on 2.5 Stable 10.
  I hope you will be able to use those features to Squid benefit.
  
  Thanks allot,
  
  Moshe Beeri.
  SW Engineer, PureSight Technologies.
  
 
 Hmmh, I had no luck to get error messages displayed as part of REQMOD
 responses (squid-icap 2.6). Does it meen this will work in the future? Does
 the patch appear in icap-2_6 too?

FWIW, ICAP request satisfaction mode seems to be working in Squid3,
using squid3-icap branch.

Alex.




Re: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches

2006-10-23 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2006-10-23 klockan 00:00 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
 2.6.STABLE5 is approaching. Estimated release date next weekend.
 
 Part of this I'd like some help to verify the patch for Bug #1779 (aka
 the commloops-2_6 branch) before that. This patch attempts to fix delay
 pools again, providing fairness between multiple connections fighting
 for bandwidth. This also allows poll/select to be converted to the new
 comm frameworks ensuring that all 4 comm loops works the same..

Now in Squid-2.6. But could use some more testing still..  I am fairly
confident it will work in all the comm loops, but...

Looking in Bugzilla I find Bug #1790, WCCP2 assignment method. Steven,
is this patch ready for commit?

Any other takers for bugfixes for 2.6.STABLE5? You'll have until
wednesday evening. After that the tree will be locked for release.
(which means don't commit anything after that until the release without
an OK from me).

Regards
Henrik


signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad	meddelandedel


RE: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches

2006-10-23 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2006-10-24 klockan 08:04 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton:

 I'll commit it, as there's no reason I can give for the second crash unless
 something else was changed.

If you see improvements in your tests, and that you are confident it
won't break other configurations using hash assignment then it's
sufficient for me.

Regards
Henrik


signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad	meddelandedel


RE: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches

2006-10-23 Thread Steven Wilton
 -Original Message-
 From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2006 5:40 AM
 To: Squid Developers
 Cc: Steven
 Subject: Re: 2.6.STABLE5 approaching, help needed to test patches
 
 mån 2006-10-23 klockan 00:00 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
  2.6.STABLE5 is approaching. Estimated release date next weekend.
  
  Part of this I'd like some help to verify the patch for Bug 
 #1779 (aka
  the commloops-2_6 branch) before that. This patch attempts 
 to fix delay
  pools again, providing fairness between multiple 
 connections fighting
  for bandwidth. This also allows poll/select to be converted 
 to the new
  comm frameworks ensuring that all 4 comm loops works the same..
 
 Now in Squid-2.6. But could use some more testing still..  I am fairly
 confident it will work in all the comm loops, but...
 
 Looking in Bugzilla I find Bug #1790, WCCP2 assignment method. Steven,
 is this patch ready for commit?
 
 Any other takers for bugfixes for 2.6.STABLE5? You'll have until
 wednesday evening. After that the tree will be locked for release.
 (which means don't commit anything after that until the 
 release without
 an OK from me).
 

I'll commit it, as there's no reason I can give for the second crash unless
something else was changed.

Steven.

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/2006
 



about the HTTP/1.1 100 Continue

2006-10-23 Thread zsx
hi, I've added some codes to squid for Transfer-Encoding: chunked, 
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, 
Content-Encoding: gzip, deflate and caching encoded/un-encoded data. My squid 
is used to cache
the MS-IIS data. I changed these codes from HTTP/1.0 to HTTP/1.1 in 
function httpBuildRequestPrefix()
of http.c. When the client request is POST,  the MS-IIS will reply HTTP/1.1 
100 Continue after squid
has just sent the HTTP-REQUEST header to MS-IIS, so, the squid will say 
httpReadReply: Request not yet fully sent , because squid has not sent 
the body data to MS-IIS and got the MS-IIS' reply. Is there
a patch for this?

Thanks
zsx
2006.10.24








___ 
Mp3疯狂搜-新歌热歌高速下
http://music.yahoo.com.cn/?source=mail_mailbox_footer


Re: Squid-dev subscription

2006-10-23 Thread Gernot Tenchio
Am Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:17:41 -0600
schrieb Alex Rousskov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 FWIW, ICAP request satisfaction mode seems to be working in Squid3,
 using squid3-icap branch.

I see random crashes because ICAPModXact::parseHead throws an
exception. This always happens if there are no headers to parse at all
(maybe because of a bug on the server side).

#11 0x08113ce9 in __cxa_throw ()
#12 0x0813ca7f in Throw ()
#13 0x0813f435 in ICAPModXact::parseHead ()
#14 0x08141f5e in ICAPModXact::parseIcapHead ()
#15 0x0814229a in ICAPModXact::parseHeaders ()
#16 0x08142675 in ICAPModXact::parseMore ()
#17 0x081427ae in ICAPModXact::handleCommRead ()
#18 0x08146161 in ICAPXaction::noteCommRead ()
#19 0x081462cd in ICAPXaction_noteCommRead ()
#20 0x080ed2cc in commio_call_callback ()
#21 0x080ed318 in commio_call_callbacks ()
#22 0x080efa19 in CommDispatcher::dispatch ()
#23 0x0808b815 in EventLoop::runOnce ()
#24 0x0808b941 in EventLoop::run ()
#25 0x080bd877 in main ()

Gernot
-- 
office: g.tenchio_AT_telco-tech_DOT_de  http://www.telco-tech.de/
privat: gernot_AT_tenchio_DOT_dehttp://www.tenchio.de/

I have discovered that there are two types of command interfaces in the
world of computing: good interfaces and user interfaces.

 -- D. J. Bernstein