I agree. My impression was that it's pretty specific to their
requirements, not a good general solution.
On 17/12/2008, at 4:17 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
ons 2008-12-17 klockan 16:12 -0500 skrev Adrian Chadd:
So is there any reason whatsoever that it can't be committed to
Squid-2.HEAD as-is, and at least backported (but not committed to
start with) to squid-2.7?
I am a bit uneasy about adding features known to be flawed in design.
Once the header format is added it becomes hard to change.
Sorry, don't remember the details right now what was flawed. See
archives for earlier discussion.
Regards
Henrik
--
Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
