Re: [squid-users] Error making squid-3.1.0.7-20090412 on Mac OS X 10.4
Found It! grr... src/acl/Time.h Your filesystem appears to be case-insensitive. We already worked out what the fix should be since its needed elsewhere for future changes. I'm testing to see what the effect is on current code and will commit ASAP. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE14 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.7
Re: [squid-users] Error making squid-3.1.0.7-20090412 on Mac OS X 10.4
Great! Thanks. Yes, the HFS+ file system is case-insensitive but case-aware and case-preserving. I look forward to being able to build 3.1. Original-Nachricht Found It! grr... src/acl/Time.h Your filesystem appears to be case-insensitive. We already worked out what the fix should be since its needed elsewhere for future changes. I'm testing to see what the effect is on current code and will commit ASAP. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE14 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.7 -- Neu: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate + Telefonanschluss für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dslspecial.gmx.de/freedsl-surfflat/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
Re: More patches for squid2-HEAD
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642 Seems uncontroversial, applying. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)? http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631 Amos, does this make sense now? http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632 I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear otherwise. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2515 Patch seems to work; applying. -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
Re: More patches for squid2-HEAD
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: snip http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)? I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to do it. Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off until Henrik can get a good look at it and voice his opinion. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631 Amos, does this make sense now? http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632 I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear otherwise. Well, Henrik may have other opinions since he has to manage it. But I'm no longer objecting to it as a temporary measure. Amos
Re: More patches for squid2-HEAD
On 23/04/2009, at 2:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: snip http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643 Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch (monitor-direct)? I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to do it. Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off until Henrik can get a good look at it and voice his opinion. OK. Henrik? FWIW, I think this is the right way to do it -- a flag saying that monitoring should be direct is backwards-compatible, easy for users to understand, and addresses the use case. http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631 Amos, does this make sense now? http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632 I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear otherwise. Well, Henrik may have other opinions since he has to manage it. But I'm no longer objecting to it as a temporary measure. Assuming that this applies to both. H? -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
Tproxy v4 patch for squid 2.7 version
Hello Developers, Tproxy-4 patch for squid 2.7 STABLE6 is released. Please review the patch and share your views. Based on your comments we will also be working on a patch for squid 2.HEAD. The patch is available at http://www.visolve.com/squid/squid-tproxy.php http://www.visolve.com/squid/squid-tproxy.php Thanks ViSolve Squid Team. http://www.visolve.com
