Re: X-Vary-Options support
2008/12/20 Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com: I agree. My impression was that it's pretty specific to their requirements, not a good general solution. Well, I'm all ears about a slightly more flexible solution. I mean, this is an X-* header; we could simply document it as a Squid specific feature once a few basic concerns have been addressed, and leave nutting out the right solution to the IETF group. :) Adrian
Re: X-Vary-Options support
I agree. My impression was that it's pretty specific to their requirements, not a good general solution. On 17/12/2008, at 4:17 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: ons 2008-12-17 klockan 16:12 -0500 skrev Adrian Chadd: So is there any reason whatsoever that it can't be committed to Squid-2.HEAD as-is, and at least backported (but not committed to start with) to squid-2.7? I am a bit uneasy about adding features known to be flawed in design. Once the header format is added it becomes hard to change. Sorry, don't remember the details right now what was flawed. See archives for earlier discussion. Regards Henrik -- Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
X-Vary-Options support
Hi, I've got a small contract to get Squid going in front of a small group of Mediawiki servers and one of the things which needs adding is the X-Vary-Options support. So is there any reason whatsoever that it can't be committed to Squid-2.HEAD as-is, and at least backported (but not committed to start with) to squid-2.7? I remember the Wiki guys' issues wrt Variant purging, which I'm hoping Y! and Benno have sorted out, and I'm not looking to commit anything relating to that now - just the X-Vary-Options support. Thanks, Adrian
Re: X-Vary-Options support
ons 2008-12-17 klockan 16:12 -0500 skrev Adrian Chadd: So is there any reason whatsoever that it can't be committed to Squid-2.HEAD as-is, and at least backported (but not committed to start with) to squid-2.7? I am a bit uneasy about adding features known to be flawed in design. Once the header format is added it becomes hard to change. Sorry, don't remember the details right now what was flawed. See archives for earlier discussion. Regards Henrik