Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?
Hi Amos, The patch is running since 3 days and seems working fine Can we expect the next squid build including the patch ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672835.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?
Hi Amos, Thanks for the explaination. We'll try to apply the patch and will test with the customer, keep you posted asap... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672800.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects
Amos, With this type of config, we'll keep in cache all stale and popular objects, I think we need special options: save_big_file on/off save_big_file_min_size 128 MB save_big_file_max_time 1 years It'll be more clear and precise, can we count of these options soon ? Bye fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/refresh-pattern-and-same-objects-tp4672792p4672806.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects
Amos, We do use cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA, so it should do the job as you explain, right ? If i understand you correctly, we should also use something like that max_stale 1 year, correct ? Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/refresh-pattern-and-same-objects-tp4672792p4672805.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?
Amos, in the meantime, I was thinking another point: We know there are at least 2 limit with cache_dirs, the max size and the 16+ million entries (Filemap bits). the cache_swap_high should take care both. example: if the used cache is 95% of the space or if the Filemap bits is 95% of the 16+ million entries. Because if the used cache is 100%, the squid could crash a few later, but if the squid is 16777216 entries it does crash immetiatly and will be looping in crashes. See what I mean ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672803.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects
Hi Amos, Is that possible to have a dedicated option with the Squid to keep objects in the cache if they're regulary used even if the time is expired ? Cleaning small expired files (16kb) is not a problem but we must keep big files into the cache if often used. There are many small ISPs with 2, 4 or 8Mbps bandwidth and big files are a problem if they've to download a fresh copy every month (if max-day 1 month). Doing a local copy is not a right way here because too many possible big objects and issues to manage them, we should have Squid able to do that. I'm thinking something like that: save_big_file on/off save_big_file_min_size 128 MB save_big_file_max_time 1 years Would it be something you could implement with Squid ? I'm sure it would work so fine bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/refresh-pattern-and-same-objects-tp4672792p4672802.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?
Hi Amos, Any update ? This morning, it was crazy: *Percent used: 100.76%* How is it possible ? Then the squid has crashed and it's now cleaning objects. I can understand new objects could be added faster than the squid is able to clean older objects, but it seems there is something wrong in the cleaning process. The wiki says /As swap utilization gets close to high-water mark object eviction becomes more aggressive./. From my point of view the aggressive is not aggressive enough... Possible to have a patch/workaround soon ? thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672791.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] refresh_pattern by type mime
Hi All, There is an existing case in the bugzilla (http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1913) speaking about this request and it seems a good idea: refresh_pattern by type mime It would be very nice and cool to have this feature in squid to define different min/max time per mime. We could define script/html/css/etc... with a short time, images/videos/audio/application/etc... with a long time... Squid team, what is your opinion about that ? Maybe already in the roadmap for the next 3.5.x build or the 4.x ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/refresh-pattern-by-type-mime-tp4672793.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?
Hi Amos, New check, 30 sec ago, same server: Store Directory #0 (aufs): /cachesdg/spool FS Block Size 4096 Bytes First level subdirectories: 16 Second level subdirectories: 256 Maximum Size: 67108864 KB Current Size: 67045256.00 KB *Percent Used: 99.91%* Filemap bits in use: 7962720 of 8388608 (95%) Filesystem Space in use: 65048176/575775620 KB (11%) Filesystem Inodes in use: 7595323/36569088 (21%) Flags: SELECTED Removal policy: lru LRU reference age: 1.08 days squid.conf: ... cache_dir aufs /cachesdg/spool 65536 16 256 min-size=0 max-size=16384 ... Traffic is 700Mbps, the server is a 8 real cores (no virtual here), 64GB memory. Load is 3, CPU is 40% So, the cache will be full in the 30 min... then, what ? Do I must be ready to see the squid crashing ? Please, check the squid code asap, thanks in advance. Bye fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672758.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] 2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: capacity_ = (1 24)
Hi All, Squid 3.5.6 in AUFS. Any idea why this error happens ? /2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: capacity_ = (1 24)/ Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/2015-07-28-22-04-49-kid1-assertion-failed-filemap-cc-50-capacity-1-24-tp4672516.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] 2015/07/28 22:04:49 kid1| assertion failed: filemap.cc:50: capacity_ = (1 24)
Hi Amos, /cache_dir aufs /cachesde/spool1 1560132 16 256 min-size=0 max-size=32768/ Will this bug be fixed in a near future, or do we have to increase the max-size to 128kb or more ? Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/2015-07-28-22-04-49-kid1-assertion-failed-filemap-cc-50-capacity-1-24-tp4672516p4672520.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi Fred, No error, no crash. Some warnings only: 2015/07/21 11:21:02 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory But we can live with these warnings, Squid will take care the missing objects... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672352.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?
Amos, How do you get the real size at the moment with a normal object ? Just do the same I suppose you get the size from the headers, right ? If we know the object is denied, we ask for a head request to know the size and we use it in the log. As the object will be blocked, we don't care this action will need 3 sec or more, the user will not get the object... See what I mean ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-get-the-correct-size-of-a-denied-object-tp4672332p4672343.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?
Hi All, As you know, when an object is denied by an ACl or other, the size of the object in the log file is the size of the ERR_* page. Is there a way to get the correct/real size of the blocked object ? I know the url is denied before squid gets the object from internet, but it should be nice to have a special action/option to write to the access.log the real size instead the ERR page size. Because here we don't care the size of the ERR page, knowing the real size of the denied object is much more important, not meaning the size we blocked but what is the size we have not downloaded, this is a valuable data with clients... Possible to plan a solution for the next build ? Just get the size by headers, deny the object then write the correct size to the access.log Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-get-the-correct-size-of-a-denied-object-tp4672332.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] How to get the correct size of a denied object ?
Antony, I got this idea too, but here we lose (i mean it's not overwritten) the info in the access.log and there is no effect of realtime if you see what I mean... An alternative could to catch the TCP_DENIED with a helper but I did not find the way yet, i think it cannot be done this way. The easy way would be to have a special %sd (Size Denied) or a %sr (Size Real) in the logformat... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-get-the-correct-size-of-a-denied-object-tp4672332p4672334.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi Amos, Here is the cache.log to check: http://utimg.unveiltech.com/tmp/amos-cache.tgz Fred, I compared the 2 source diskd.cc, squid 3.4.8 and 3.5.6 both official, no dif. So, using the diskd 3.4 with the 3.5 does not seem to be a good idea, result should be the same. Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672331.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Yuri, Debian 7 or 8, tested on both... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672212.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Yury, you mean that having the DISKD 52 times slower then AUFS with linux OS is normal ? I cannot believe that, incredible ! I could understand the double or the triple, but here we're speaking about 50+ times... Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672214.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi All, I face a weird issue regarding DISKS cache-dir model and I would like to have your expertise here Here is the result of a cache object with an AUFS cache_dir: 1436916227.603462 192.168.1.88 00:0c:29:6e:2c:99 TCP_HIT/200 10486356 GET http://proof.ovh.net/files/10Mio.dat - HIER_NONE/- application/octet-stream 0x30 Now, here is the same object from the same Squid box but using the DISKD cache_dir: 1436916293.648 24281 192.168.1.88 00:0c:29:6e:2c:99 TCP_HIT/200 10486356 GET http://proof.ovh.net/files/10Mio.dat - HIER_NONE/- application/octet-stream 0x30 Do you see something weird ? This is the same Squid (3.5.5), I just changed from AUFS to DISKD and restarted the Squid... Same object from the cache but *0.462 sec* in AUFS and *24.281 sec* in DISKD. 52 times more fast in AUFS, why ? Any idea to speed the diskd up or at least reduce it ? I could understand the response times could not be the same, but here this is the Grand Canyon ! My cache_dir option used in test: cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid3w1 190780 16 256 min-size=0 max-size=293038080 Thanks in advance for your input... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi Amos, Sorry but the Rock mode is totaly bugged, the worst mode to use here. We did tons of tests, small, medium and big rock cache, all crash process after process. We have definitively abandonned the Rock mode while it'll be the same results. So, it seems we'll have to switch all boxes from diskd to aufs, but I think we could survive Anyway, we liked the diskd because we see good stability, but the HITed objects are really too slow, all my clients are complaining, that's why we did many tests yesterday and we found these times... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672226.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi Fred, We did the tests with 1 hard disk only (for testing), we used 150 req/sec, load was around 0.7-0.8 Naaa, response times are crazy in DISKD/TCP_HIT (20+ sec instead 0.5 sec in AUFS) but it concerns TCP_HIT only, the other flags are corrects in DISKD. I'll try the noatime... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672230.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Fred, Welcome to the club... -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672227.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Hi Fred, We did the tests with 1 hard disk only (for testing), we used 150 req/sec, load was around 0.7-0.8 Naaa, response times are crazy in DISKD/TCP_HIT (20+ sec instead 0.5 sec in AUFS) but it concerns TCP_HIT only, the other flags are corrects in DISKD. I'll try the noatime... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672231.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Fred, We have upgraded 4 big ISPs to the latest 3.5.6 in AUFS, feedbacks are so good. I can tell you clients see a big (positive) change here. We use the same settings in the squid.conf but AUFS instead DISKD, the difference is crazy... In the past we moved to the Diskd due to too many errors in Aufs (isEmpty, etc...), now it seems all these errors (welcome to new ones...) have been fixed. So, again, I only speak about the Diskd and the TCP_HIT, other flags are ok with us. Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672259.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Fred, (Guys, 2 french Fred here, but not the sames) Did you check the TCP_HIT response times with the Diskd ? During our tests, we have seen than it's sometime better to download the object from internet again instead using the one from the cache, we got better response times... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672235.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
Fred, Not sure we'll have free time for testing the previous 3.4, we now have dozens of boxes to manually upgrade to the 3.5.6... yes, we do use the original squid 3.5.6 package, no build mix here. Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672268.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraries/CDNs Booster
Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.545 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ - July 8th 2015. - Apple Music - new! - Google Music - new! - and more ... More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4672107.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Amos, We did tons of tests with the latest Squid versions and this is not the behaviour with the host_verify_strict off and client_dst_passthru off. With those 2 options OFF, we see a lot of ORIGINAL_DST that we should not see if we follow your explainations, so it seems there is a bug somewhere ? Can you check from your side (tproxy or not, same behaviour), thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672054.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Amos, Can we expect a workaround to allow the object to the cache if the dns record is corrected by Squid instead that having an ORIGINAL_DST ? If Squid corrects the request, it mean the URL will be good, so we should be able to cache the object Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672041.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Amos, You told the Squid will check the original dns from the headers, then it'll do its own dns resolution to verify they both match. So, if no match, Squid does the request to internet based on the dns it found. If I'm right, that the current way, correct ? What we could do is the same way but as Squid has downloaded the object based on its dns records, it means the object is correct, the right one. So, keep all details from Squid job and push the object to the cache (if cacheable). user request - squid checks the dns is ok (corrects it if needed) - squid download the right object and cache. user request - squid checks the dns is ok (corrects it if needed) - squid pushs from its cache. Again, if Squid requests the right object based on its dns requests, it'll deliver to clients the good one. So, we should not see ORIGINAL_DST anymore... And, when I see the archi Yuri must to do to avoid ORIGINAL_DST, I'm sure all Squid users will be happy Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672044.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi, I'm back to this post because it still does not work. You explain OFF - Squid selects a (possibly new, or not) IP to be used as the server (logs DIRECT)., sorry to say this is not the reality in the Squid. We have set the pass-thru directive to OFF and here is the result: TCP_MISS/206 72540 GET http://www.google.com/dl/chrome/win/B6585D9F8CF5DBD2/43.0.2357.130_chrome_installer.exe - ORIGINAL_DST/216.58.220.36 Is there a way to totaly disable the DNS control done by Squid ? Thanks Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672013.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Amos, 216.58.220.36 != www.google.com ??? Have a look: http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/216.58.220.36, this is google. Depending the DNS server used, the IP can change, we know that especialy due to BGP. In the case the client is an ISP providing internet to smaller ISPs with different DNS with their end users, here I understand that due to the ORIGINAL_DST squid will check the headers and if the dns records do not match so squid will not cache, even with a storeid engine, because too many different DNS servers in the loop (users - small ISP - big ISP - squid - internet), am I right ? So, the result is a very poor 9% saving where we could expect around 50% saving. Can you plan, for a next build, a workaround to accept the original dns record from the headers and check dns if and only if the headers do not contain any dns record ? I understand Squid should provide some securities but here we should have the possibility to ON/OFF these securities. Or do we need to downgrade to Squid 2.7/3.0 ? ISPs need to cache a lot, security is not their main issue. Thanks in advance. Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672020.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Yury, In your installation, with your devices... At home, I do the same like you, but I'm not an ISP. Here the issue is that end users could use different dns the ISPs cannot control. Home/Entreprise, the admin can control the used DNS servers with devices. In an ISP environment, we cannot control/manage, end users do what they want. 2 different worlds, not the same rules, sorry Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4672024.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi Amos, Yep, i did not modify the TTL transaction. Here, it seems the parent (sibling mode) tries to do the request itself but faces an error (504 gateway timeout), it should answer to the kid it does not have the object (TCP_MISS) then the parent should download the object from internet. With this error, i suspect the kid accepts the error and does nothing more, replying to the browser (user) something like sorry, the object is missing. How can i force the kid to download the object from internet when the parent replies a such answer ? bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671955.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi Antony, Correct, the kid contacts the parent that is getting a 504 and replies the same to the kid. That's why I suspect the parent tries to download by itself instead replying to the kid it does not have the object so the kid should do a fresh download from internet. examples: TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://w.sharethis.com/button/buttons.js - CD_SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NNVXD6 - CD_SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x TCP_MISS/504 478 GET http://dl4.offercdn.com/2613/styleVideo.css - HIER_NONE/- TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://www.indianrail.gov.in/seat_Avail.html - CD_SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x etc... The kid receives these answers and does nothing more, the result is the browser (client) does not have all the objects for a correct page... Sometimes, the page is blank because a js script, css, etc... is missing. There are 2 squid, sibling each of them. Squid1 (10.1.1.1): cache_peer 10.1.1.2 sibling 8182 8183 proxy-only no-tproxy Squid2 (10.1.1.2): cache_peer 10.1.1.1 sibling 8182 8183 proxy-only no-tproxy Both are in tproxy (settings from the Squid wiki), ICP is enabled with each squid. if you need more details, feel free to ask Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671957.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi, I disabled the sibling on both squid servers, we got one 504: TCP_MISS/504 361 GET http://rate.msfsob.com/review?h=www.searchhomeremedy.com - HIER_DIRECT/8.25.35.129 A wget on this url gives a 404, so here we can say the object does not exist, the TCP_MISS/504 seems a correct answer. But no new 504... the ISP is a 500Mbps. If we enable the sibling, we get one/two 504 every second on both squid. any idea ? Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671964.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Anthony, Amos, The 2 squid are kid/parent each of them (both sibling). So, when one aks the second, they play the role of kid - parent, am I right ? Here is the way: Squid1 checks the Squid2 and gets that: ... user-ip TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js - CD_SIBLING_HIT/10.1.1.2 ... Squid2 replies that to the Squid1: ... squid1-ip TCP_MISS/504 478 GET http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js - HIER_NONE/- text/html I did many wget with unavailable objects from both squid servers, i can get the objects correctly. I'll disable the sibling to check if we still have TCP_MISS/504, keep you posted... As the 2 squid are in production at the ISP datacenter, not sure I could apply a debug... They do have the same route connected to 2 mikrotik (squid1 - mikrotik1, squid 2 - mikrotik2), both mikrotik connected to the same cisco router. Mangles/DNS/Gateway on mikrotiks are the same. Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671962.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Amos, We used this example from the wiki: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/CacheHierarchy We can see a sibling/sibling archi is possible, right ? Here, we can not have a cache_peer parent archi as the tproxy (original user ip) will be lost at the parent level, you wrote this in a previous post I did. So, we must have a sibling/sibling with the 2 squid servers, both in tproxy. Now, if there is a better archi and correct settings to build a tproxy/sibling-sibling archi, please share My ISP is nice and I can arrange that with him... Thanks in advance. Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671966.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi, Could the issue be related to that ? TCP_MEM_HIT/200 224442 GET http://squid1/8b26b519d740afd8ec698b6af06efd8e17c6e5b6:8182/squid-internal-periodic/store_digest - HIER_NONE/- application/cache-digest Is it normal to see the store-digest as a MEM_HIT ? I say to the squid to do not reply with a HIT: acl cachedigest rep_mime_type application/cache-digest store_miss deny cachedigest send_hit deny cachedigest In my squids, i have 64 kb as the maximum object in memory: maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB How a 244 kb object can be saved in memory More exploring, more weird... Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671972.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Amos, Yes, similar case here on the 4223. By reading the case 4223, we can see that part Non-cacheable objects should never be added to the digest. from you. In my squid, there is no restriction, ICP is fully open, squid server (3.5.5) are compiled with the digest option, so all is done to allow ICP/digest connection and exchange. So, why the servers think they got the objects, especially when they are not cacheable and not cached ? To me, it seems the servers think they have the object but they don't, so they reply with a 404 translated by a 504 to the squid client because sibling archi. I could understand it could be a bug but the squid client should see the 504 and should request the object from internet, no ? At the moment, i use a retry_on_error on as a workaround but not sure it's fixing all 504. Then, having a dedicated cable between squid servers is not a realistic solution, my ISP will not see that as a serious solution Last point, no-tproxy rule on parent type cache_peer, it does not work, we tried that. We applied that option 1 month ago and the internet sees the squid ip, not the original ip address, so maybe another bug here... Fred. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671970.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi All, is someone with an idea why it happens ? *TCP_MISS/504 708 GET http://www.myexamplecom/images/menu_hover_left.png - CD_SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x* i can see the TCP_MISS with the SIBLING only... i'm looking for this issue since several days and it makes me crazy thanks in advance. bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TCP_MISS/504 in cache_peer
Hi Amos, 1. What does the 504 mean ? 2. How can i extend the TTL transaction ? Thanks :o) -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-504-in-cache-peer-tp4671944p4671946.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 with SIBLING
Hi All, Weird issue with 2 Squid 3.5.5 in sibling mode, here is the trace: .. TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET http://www.greatandhra.com/ - SIBLING_HIT/x.x.x.x Any idea ? Thanks in advance for your inputs... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-MISS-ABORTED-000-with-SIBLING-tp4671735.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid cache_peer in tproxy
Hi Amos, Ok, it does confirm our tests. Is there a way to do this: users - squid1 tproxy - squid2/squid3 tproxy - internet (seeing the user ips) ? or is it impossible ? in the wiki, there is an option no-tproxy in the cache_peer, it would be nice to have a keep-tproxy bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-cache-peer-in-tproxy-tp4671602p4671621.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Squid cache_peer in tproxy
Hi All, We're facing a weird issue with the cache_peer and tproxy. Squid 3.5.4 users - squid1 - squid2/squid3 - internet squid1: http_port 3128 http_port 3129 tproxy icp_port 3130 cache_peer 192.168.1.2 parent 3128 3130 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-digest cache_peer 192.168.1.3 parent 3128 3130 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-digest squid2: http_port 3128 icp_port 3130 cache_peer 192.168.1.3 sibling 3128 3130 proxy-only no-digest squid3: http_port 3128 icp_port 3130 cache_peer 192.168.1.2 sibling 3128 3130 proxy-only no-digest The user IPs are corrects at the squid1 but we lost them at the squid2/squid3, here we see the squid1 ip only. Where are we wrong ? Thanks for your inputs bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-cache-peer-in-tproxy-tp4671602.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?
Hi Yuri, the url does not change, i use the same url for the tests: http://r8---sn-n4g-jqbe.gvt1.com/edgedl/chrome/win/776B03BEAFB2810D/42.0.2311.152_chrome_installer.exe it should work with the storeid. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-cache-Chrome-Installer-tp4671271p4671286.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] How to cache Chrome Installer ?
Hi Yuri, Do you get a TCP_HIT with your rules ? From my side, i get this: *X-Cache: MISS* from blablabla... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/How-to-cache-Chrome-Installer-tp4671271p4671273.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Cache peers with different load
Hi Amos, Thanks for the explainations Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Cache-peers-with-different-load-tp4671204p4671249.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Cache peers with different load
Hi All, A crazy thing I cannot understand: - 3 squid 3.5.4 the child (172.10.1.1) is like that: cache_peer 172.10.1.2 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-tproxy cache_peer 172.10.1.3 parent 8182 8183 proxy-only weighted-round-robin background-ping no-tproxy ICP is allowed on the 3 squids. Traffic is not equal, not balanced as I expect. cache .2 is 200MB after 10 min cache .3 is 4GB in the same time Sure I'm missing something here, but what ? Thanks in advance for your input... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Cache-peers-with-different-load-tp4671204.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Cache peers with different load
Hi Amos, OK, got it. But why a so big gap on the 2 parents ? The 3 squids are on the same range, connected to the same switch, all in 1Gb NIC. No problem if there are some MB difference, but here it's 10+ times more between 2 parents Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Cache-peers-with-different-load-tp4671204p4671207.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Number of clients accessing cache: 0
Hi Amos, Well, as usual, you found the reason client_db was off, now it shows the numbers... Thanks Amos. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Number-of-clients-accessing-cache-0-tp4671102p4671117.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Number of clients accessing cache: 0
Hi All, Seems the number of connected clients is always 0 (zero) since the 3.5.3... We have tested with 10+ differents and simultaneous client ips and the number always shows 0. Latest tested build, the 3.5.4 official, still 0 as clients accessing the cache... Is there something wrong here ? Here is a sample: /usr/local/squid3/bin/squidclient -h 127.0.0.1 -p 3128 mgr:info |grep Number of Number of clients accessing cache: 0 Number of HTTP requests received: 9189 Number of ICP messages received:8581 Number of ICP messages sent:8625 Number of queued ICP replies: 0 Number of HTCP messages received: 0 Number of HTCP messages sent: 0 Number of file desc currently in use: 30 Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Number-of-clients-accessing-cache-0-tp4671102.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:557: F-flags.open
Hi Nathan, Thanks for the reply, I applied the latest build (squid.3.5.3-r13808), waiting for the client to check if it fixed or not Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/assertion-failed-comm-cc-557-F-flags-open-tp4670788p4670935.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:557: F-flags.open
Hi All, Is anyone with an trick regarding this error message in the cache.log ? *assertion failed: comm.cc:557: F-flags.open* Squid *3.5.3-20150415-r13798*. config in diskd, tproxy and ssl_bump. when the squid faces this error, it reloads itself but it breaks the surf for a while. Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/assertion-failed-comm-cc-557-F-flags-open-tp4670788.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption
Hi All, No reply ? Do we have to leave with this mega/crazy bug ? Is there someone in the Squid team able to have a look to this problem or nobody care ? Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Random-SSL-bump-DB-corruption-tp4670289p4670723.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption
Hi Amos, All, We have done as you indicate, but the index.tx is still corrupted, have a look: *V 250406120057Z 2C564651B40D1F4F6CAFFF06EA8B201580E3B678 unknown /CN=173.194.65.84+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 71664F2E27C4E321B2A4F59EA3971D70C298DAFB unknown /CN=173.194.112.167+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 45205F68B7AD2DEEBE408E55FF8DADE5C88F6A99 unknown /CN=74.125.136.188+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 6CFF07CBB3BE016022AF2EA75BA56EC99FD8256E unknown /CN=173.194.112.177+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 5829213872C31284E8853C079BF51A0E50F89CF8 unknown /CN=173.194.112.166+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 06BC95EACDEEC116E11B1B6CE66C9179C4251D6E unknown /CN=173.194.112.164+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 250406120057Z 7ECFE99D51088BD0692A7439EBAFEDA38A29BC unknown /CN=173.194.112.185+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 15062300Z 49F18ABCB410F18BE715AF26AEEB0EE4E1D89DC6 unknown /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.google.com+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 15062300Z 3A2A74F1431B28F9E268B8762706F69597D11447 unknown /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.googleapis.com+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 15062300Z 695CC4B75B9F38E29836BB211432FF8286966313 unknown /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.google-analytics.com+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 V 15062300Z 21C204121B238D4B48F0196F4D644B7A5F775574 unknown /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com+Sign=signTrusted+SignHash=SHA256 HA256 * What's the *HA256* at the end of the file ? here is the squid.conf (3.5.3): sslproxy_capath /etc/ssl/certs acl sslstep1 at_step SslBump1 ssl_bump peek sslstep1 ssl_bump bump all ssl_bump splice all sslcrtd_program /usr/local/squid3/lib/ssl_crtd -s /var/lib/ssl_db -M 8MB sslcrtd_children 16 startup=5 idle=1 The Squid crash every 1-2 hours. Seems the ssl_crtd fails in writing data tot he index.txt. Thanks for your help. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Random-SSL-bump-DB-corruption-tp4670289p4670708.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption
Yuri,
We’re trying that :
- Tproxy
- ssl_bump bump all
does not work.
We have followed the squid wiki regarding iptables rules, sysctl, etc…
Instead “ssl_bump bump all”, if we use “ssl_bump server-first all” , it works,
the https is decrypted.
So is the tproxy compatible with the new squid 3.5.x ssl_bump options ?
Bye Fred
De : Yuri Voinov [via Squid Web Proxy Cache]
[mailto:ml-node+s1019090n4670662...@n4.nabble.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 9 avril 2015 15:03
À : Stakres
Objet : Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Random SSL bump DB corruption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I think,first you can try new stage-based SSL bump with 3.5.x. To do that you
must identify problem sites.
If there is no results, you can simple bypass problem sites without bump.
Whole server-first bump, on Squid 3.5.x especially, is not so good idea, I
think. Especially on provider-level proxies.
09.04.15 19:09, Vdoctor пишет:
Yuri,
So what’s next ?
Do you mean we must “do-not-ssl-bump” wrong certificats ?
And if a certificate not yet identified is requested by an
user it’ll crash the Squid ?
Any idea how to fix that issue ?
Thanks in advance.
Bye Fred
De : Yuri Voinov [[hidden email]]
Envoyé : jeudi 9 avril 2015 15:04
À : Vdoctor; [hidden email]
Objet : Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [squid-users] Random SSL bump DB
corruption
- From my experience, it may occur as a result of forming the
fake certificate zero length (in the case of the SQUID can not
complete its formation for any reason).
In turn, the formation of such a certificate occurs in
particular due to any error in the code of the SQUID
characteristics or if server certificate. In particular, one of
these servers is iTunes.
09.04.15 19:00, Vdoctor пишет:
Yury,
I checked the source code (3.4/3.5) ssl_crtd, the
default
size is 2048.
-b fs_block_size File system block size in
bytes.
Need for processing
natural size of
certificate on disk.
Default value is
2048 bytes.
/**
\ingroup ssl_crtd
* This is the external ssl_crtd process.
*/
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
try {
size_t max_db_size = 0;
size_t fs_block_size = 2048;
But the crazy thing is the index.txt (last line)
is wrong,
not complete. It seems the tool writes/saves wrong data
that's why
it becomes corrupted and crash the Squid.
We have tried with a single ssl_crtd in the
squid.conf, then
one per worker, the same corruption.
Bye Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : squid-users
[[hidden email]] De
la part de
Yuri Voinov
Envoyé : jeudi 9 avril 2015 14:52
À : [hidden email]
Objet : ***SPAM*** Re: [squid-users] Random SSL
bump DB
corruption
Don't think this is critical. What is native fs
block size?
09.04.15 13:29, Stakres пишет
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Amos, We have done additional tests in production with ISPs and the ORIGINAL_DST in tproxy cannot be cached. In normal mode (not tproxy), ORIGINAL_DST can be cached, no problem. But once in tproxy (http_port 3128 tproxy), no way, it's impossible to get TCP_HIT. We have played with the client_dst_passthru and the host_verify_strict, many combinaisons on/off. By settings client_dst_passthru ON and host_verify_strict OFF, we can reduce the number of ORIGINAL_DST (generating DNS alerts in the cache.log) but it makes issues with HTTPS websites (facebook, hotmail, gmail, etc...). We have also tried many DNS servers (internals and/or externals), same issue. I read what you explain in your previous email but it seems there is something weird. The problem is that the ORIGINAL_DST could be up to 25% of the traffic with some installations meaning this part is out-of-control in term of cache potential. All help is welcome here Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4670629.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] assertion failed: Read.cc:205: params.data == data
Hi All,
Strange problem during surf, squid 3.5.3, 64bits, Debian 7.8:
*2015/04/01 19:19:06 kid3| assertion failed: Read.cc:205: params.data ==
data*
caches:
workers 3
cache_dir rock /var/spool/squid3r1 166400 min-size=0 max-size=65536
swap-timeout=500 max-swap-rate=200/sec
if ${process_number} = 1
cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid3w1 453282 16 256 min-size=65536
max-size=1250301952
endif
if ${process_number} = 2
cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid3w2 453282 16 256 min-size=65536
max-size=1250301952
endif
if ${process_number} = 3
cache_dir diskd /var/spool/squid3w3 453282 16 256 min-size=65536
max-size=1250301952
endif
/dev/shm exists, correct rights.
/var/run/squid exists, correct rights.
Anyone with experience about this error ?
Bye Fred
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/assertion-failed-Read-cc-205-params-data-data-tp4670624.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Open Squid Box - FREE
Hi Amos, This is not a LiveCD, this is a *complete solution* including Squid, web console, statistics, graphs, StoreID plugin, etc... An Open solution for people who needs an all-in-one system ready and running in 10 min maxi... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Open-Squid-Box-FREE-tp4670502p4670504.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Open Squid Box - FREE
*WAN Optimization and Internet Acceleration in Open Source*. OpenSquidBox is an Open Source of an already pre-configured Squid Proxy Cache Server under Linux that can be installed within few minute. It’s an ISO Software Appliance that can be loaded on any hardware and virtual appliance. It contains an already pre-installed configured 64 bits Linux OS and Squid Proxy Cache software and includes a web graphical console for easy configuration management of your cache server. The Installation of the ISO file on your own hardware/software appliance takes only few minutes. No extra manual installation or configuration is required. Your cache server is then immediately ready to work. Easy customizable solution for those you need to install rapidly a Cache Server or want to learn practice Squid Cache with a nice open source graphical web console. Dedicated website about * http://osb.unveiltech.com OpenSquidBox* *Startup Users*: You are not yet an expert in Linux nor in Squid Cache but you need something ready to go to work/play with it. You can not invest time to investigate how to install/setup and configure. *Advanced Admins*: You need to setup a new Proxy Cache server but you do not have time to install and configure it. You need something ready-to-use and to install on your hardware appliance. Within few minutes you have something installed and working. Worry-free solution. *Professionals*: You are looking for a software appliance solution to deploy at your customers site. You need something ready-to-use and to install on your hardware appliance. Get an immediate solution within few minutes. Easy configurable solution. *Main Features* ISO Software Appliance solution ready to download ISO file already containing Linux OS pre-configured Contains most popular Squid Proxy Cache software pre-configured Easy to Install on your own hardware appliance 64 bits OS and Proxy Cache Server Installation in few minutes No extra manual installation or configuration required Works on Hardware or Virtual Appliance Already preconfigured with default settings Includes a web graphical console for easy configuration management: Modern graphical console Realtime and Mbps graphs No need to manually configure setting files Rapid access to configuration with web console Easy Customizable Solution Ready to use solution Good solution to learn and practice Squid Proxy Cache Open Source solution (Root account is provided for free) Version 1.03 - March 19th 2015 ISO is now available to all in Open Source including the SquidVideoBooster plugin trial 7 days *Installation*: - Download the ISO - Burn a CD or USB stick - Boot on the CD/USB and install - Once installed, go to the web console: http://opensquidbox-ip-address:81 Feel free for comment, suggest or improve it... Enjoy, Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Open-Squid-Box-FREE-tp4670502.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi All, Does someone know why the *client_dst_passthru* does not work in TProxy mode ? From the Squid wiki, we can read that: /Regardless of this option setting, when dealing with intercepted traffic Squid will verify the Host: header and any traffic which fails Host verification will be treated as if this option were ON/. In normal (no intercept) http_port, the option works fine but does not act on Tproxy... Thanks in advance for your feedbacks Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru
Hi Eliezer, Well, we have done many tests with Squid (3.1 to 3.5.x), disabling client_dst_passthru (off) will stop the DNS entry as explained in the wiki, the option directly acts on the flag ORIGINAL_DST. As you know, ORIGINAL_DST switches the optimization off (ex: StoreID) then it's not possible to cache the URL (ex: http://cdn2.example.com/mypic.png). In no tproxy/NAT mode, the client_dst_passthru works perfectly by disabling the DNS entry control, so optimization is done correctly. But in tproxy/NAT, the client_dst_passthru has no effect, we see ORIGINAL_DST in logs. So, maybe I'm totaly wrong here the client_dst_passthru is not related to the ORIGINAL_DST, or there is an explaination why the client_dst_passthru does not act in tproxy/NAT... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TProxy-and-client-dst-passthru-tp4670189p4670194.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x
Hi All, New build 2.07 https://sourceforge.net/projects/youtuberesolutionlocker/ : - YouTube - Vevo - Vimeo - iMDB - Dailymotion - Break.com - Apple Trailers Ask your free 1 year license on the website Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Resolution-Locker-Plugin-for-Squid-Proxy-Cache-3-x-tp4669489p4670018.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.35 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ - February 22th 2015. - New websites More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4670015.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x
Hi All, New build 2.05 https://sourceforge.net/projects/youtuberesolutionlocker/ including Dailymotion... Still a free 1 year license on the website https://svl.unveiltech.com/ Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Resolution-Locker-Plugin-for-Squid-Proxy-Cache-3-x-tp4669489p4669549.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Resolution Locker Plugin for Squid Proxy Cache 3.x
Hi All, SquidVideoLocker for Squid Proxy Cache is a plugin that locks and limits video resolutions of YouTube, Vevo and iMDB. The plugin takes into account all video formats, all resolutions from 144p up to 2160p. Reduce video resolutions from YouTube, Vevo and iMDB to the lower existing resolution in order to save significant amount of bandwidth for other usages. Once installed on your Squid Proxy Cache, each time one of your users tries to view a web video from YouTube, Vevo or iMDB, the plugin will lock and limit the video resolution in order to reduce the size of the audio/video to download and free precious bandwidth for other users. Visit our dedicated website SquidVideoLocker https://svl.unveiltech.com and get a *free 1 year license*. Version 2.01 - February 2th 2015 - Standalone program with no addtional library needed (no external libraries anymore) - Independent Squid plugin that does not need the Cloud API anymore - Compatible All Linux distribution (tested under Debian/Ubuntu/CentOS 64bits and Debian 32bits) Installation: - Uncompress ut-reslocker.2.01.tgz to /etc/squid depending your compilation options - Depending on your platform (32bits or 64 bits), verify that the permissions of binary (/etc/squid/[proc]/ut-reslocker) are 0755 - Then, edit your squid.conf to add the following: # # # SquidVideoLocker url_rewrite_program /etc/squid/ut-reslocker # You could increase the number of children if you manage huge traffic url_rewrite_children 8 - Finally, reload Squid: squid -k reconfigure Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Resolution-Locker-Plugin-for-Squid-Proxy-Cache-3-x-tp4669489.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5 with Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. New version 2.31 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster including new websites and bug fix - January 28th 2015. More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4669395.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Yuri, Do not worry, I need more ot be offended Yes regexp is great but this is not clear for all, I mean they have to understand regexp and speak Perl... Nice to see you reach 70% with your rules, I really doubt about the 70% with those simple rules but I'm ready to believe you. Maybe you could use our plugin for some tests, maybe you'll reach 80+% and maybe you'll abandon your script... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668936.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi All, Advanced Caching Add-On for Linux Squid Proxy Cache for Videos, Music, Images, Libraries and CDNs. By default your existing Squid Proxy Cache cannot properly cache most popular multi-media websites like YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, DailyMotion, Vimeo, Vevo, Google Maps Apps, Apple, Tumblr, Yandex, etc... Now there is a quick and easy solution within 5 minutes you can load this Squid add-on to significantly improve the caching possibilities and performance of your Squid Proxy Cache. More than *600+ websites* are already supported and can be cached automatically in order to get the best out of your existing Internet bandwidth. List of all supported web sites (600+) http://www.unveiltech.com/videosboost.php SquidVideoBooster works with Squid v2.7, v3.4 and v3.5. New version 2.24 including new websites - January 5th 2015. More details on https://svb.unveiltech.com https://svb.unveiltech.com Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668929.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi Yuri, Does the we don't need means you don't need or do you speak for all users of Squid ? We have done tons of tests with the storeid_file_rewrite, sorry to tell you it does not achieve 70% because: - The prog you provide is nude, I mean there is 1 example only - Admins have to check hundred of websites to correctly add them into the process - All do not know Perl langage - Many websites are specific in their URLs like YouTube, Akamai, etc... So, I perfectly understand the /we don't need any hardcoded commercial analogue./ but correct me if I'm wrong you're not alone on the planet, correct ? There are admins looking for a complete solution because they have no free time to spend by doing the de-duplication by themselves. My message is to inform them, if you're not interested no problem but some want to be updated. Thanks in advance to keep my post safe. If this type of message is not accepted in this forum, ok just let me know. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668933.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Determining unique clients in Squid
Hi Veiko, Correct me if Im wrong, you need to use Squid in HTTPS decryption and try to cache maximum of objects (mainly big), am I right ? Regarding the private/public objects, I could not answer here as I dont see what your project is then Im not a member of the Squid team so Im not informed about all tricks J So, do you plan to install a Squid for your users for regular internet traffic or do you have special restrictions for a specific Squid installation ? Ready to help you but need more details on what you want to do J Bye Fred De : Veiko Kukk [via Squid Web Proxy Cache] [mailto:ml-node+s1019090n4668773...@n4.nabble.com] Envoyé : vendredi 19 décembre 2014 15:43 À : Stakres Objet : Determining unique clients in Squid Hi, I have been trying to understand, how does Squid determine different clients, but it is not clear from the documentation. I guess this does not depend entirely on IP address, right? Otherwise all clients behind NAT would be considered as single client. Reason behind this is that I'd like to configure a forward proxy for (mostly) binary files caching. All requests have Authorization headers (API key) and come from single IP address (localhost, python application, not generic web browser). client https squid ssl_bump to see inside https https remote cloud storage http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InnerWorkings#What_are_private_and_publ ic_keys.3F Private objects are associated with only a single client whereas a public object may be sent to multiple clients at the same time. I wonder if it would be possible to use Squid for effectively cache larger objects locally with this type of configuration? Best regards, Veiko ___ squid-users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Determining-unique-client s-in-Squid-tp4668773.html To start a new topic under Squid - Users, email ml-node+s1019090n1019091...@n4.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Squid Web Proxy Cache, click here http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp ?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=1019090code=dmRvY3RvckBuZXVmLmZyfDEwMTkwOTB 8OTE5NjEzNjUz . http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp ?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.n amespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.vie w.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail .naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aema il.naml NAML -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Determining-unique-clients-in-Squid-tp4668773p4668780.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi All, New build 2.17 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ with additional website... Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668738.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
[squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi All, Just to let you know the SquidVideoBooster is now compatible with Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 to speed up your Video, Music, Image files, Libraries (Jquery, Bootstrap, etc...), Software Updates (Windows Update, Apple, Android, etc...), Smartphone/Tablet Apps, CDNs. It'll help you to save more than 50% of your bandwidth... The plugin is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ The plugin takes into account 600+ web sites (http://www.unveiltech.com/videosboost.php) including YouTube, DailyMotion, Vimeo, Vevo, iMDB, Netflix, Windows Update, Anti-Virus updates, etc... Read the readme.txt for the new compatibility with Squid 2.7. Enjoy Dedicated website about SquidVideBooster and licensing: http://www.unveiltech.com/indexsquidvideobooster.php Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraris-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Help with Windows updates
Hi JP, Have you tried the SquidVideoBooster ? It takes care Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 including Windows Update and hundred of other websites. https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster Link to the news http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraris-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683.html . Dedicated website about SquidVideoBooster and licensing: http://www.unveiltech.com/indexsquidvideobooster.php Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Help-with-Windows-updates-tp4668681p4668685.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5 Videos/Music/Images/Libraris/CDNs Booster
Hi Ahmed, I could not answer concerning the SMP 32KB caching limitation, Amos and/or Eliezer should be the right persons here to answer you. Regarding the SquidVideoBooster, this is a plugin to Squid. If you Squid supports the SMP so the SquidVideoBooster will work. Reminder, the SquidVideoBooster is a plugin to de-duplicate similar URLs (video, CDNs etc...) with Squid. The SquidVideoBooster will not fix misconfigurations or issues with Squid... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-2-7-3-4-and-3-5-Videos-Music-Images-Libraries-CDNs-Booster-tp4668683p4668693.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi All, New build 2.12 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ available. - New websites added - New option -shakir to boost speedtest.net Enjoy Dedicated website about SquidVideBooster and licensing: http://www.unveiltech.com/indexsquidvideobooster.php Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668677.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi All, New build 2.05 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster - New option -g to enable the Global Generic Patterns acting with not-yet identified websites. This option will do its best to de-duplicate all websites. - Bugs fix - New websites added (600+) Dedicated website about SquidVideBooster and licensing http://www.unveiltech.com/indexsquidvideobooster.php : Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668643.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi Eliezer, /Would squid debug_options relevant to StoreID feature be enough for debugging?/ Honestly ? We don't know because we did not need Squid debug options to build this plugin This is now developed in C++, the main issue is to be sure it'll work with all Linux distri. without any additional linux tools/libraries... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668645.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Eliezer, Good to know We indicate in the readme.txt the distri. we hve tested: *Note: Currently SquidVideoBooster is available for Linux Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Suse, etc... Secific Linux distribution can be provided on demand. * Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668647.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi All, New build 2.01 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ avilable. Version 2.01 - December 4th 2014 - Standalone program with no addtional library needed (no external libraries anymore) - Independent Squid plugin that does not need the Cloud API anymore - Compatible All Linux distri., (tested under Debian/Ubuntu/CentOS 64bits and Debian 32bits) - porn=0/1 option removed - New option -v to display the version of the plugin - Taking care 500+ web sites: http://www.unveiltech.com/videosboost.php Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668602.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi All, Here we go with the new version 2.00 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ What's news: - *Independent Squid plugin* that does not need the Cloud API anymore - Compatible Debian/Ubuntu 32/64bits and CentOS 64bits - porn=0/1 option removed - Taking care 500+ web sites: http://www.unveiltech.com/videosboost.php Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668595.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5: Delay parameters bungled what changes ?
Hi, Any news ? feedbacks ? nobody interested ? Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-Delay-parameters-bungled-what-changes-tp4668259p4668329.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.x Videos/Music Booster
Hi All, New release 1.07 https://sourceforge.net/projects/squidvideosbooster/ including the Netflix video streams, all countries... Enjoy Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-x-Videos-Music-Booster-tp4666154p4668310.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
