[squid-users] is SPDY supported by squid ?
Hi, I found http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTP2 and I wonder if it is the actual state, that SPDY is planned for squid 3.5, or is it allready implemented in the actual version. -- Regards Dieter -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the From field.
Re: [squid-users] is SPDY supported by squid ?
Hi, as I understand from several messages on the squid-dev mailing list, SPDY is not going to be supported. The first HTTP/2.0-related code is being debated and worked on in these weeks. If you are interested, you may want to join the squid-dev mailing list. Contributions are always welcome :) On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dieter Bloms sq...@bloms.de wrote: Hi, I found http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTP2 and I wonder if it is the actual state, that SPDY is planned for squid 3.5, or is it allready implemented in the actual version. -- Regards Dieter -- I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software. If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the From field. -- /kinkie
Re: [squid-users] is SPDY supported by squid ?
On 2013-11-27 04:20, Dieter Bloms wrote: Hi, I found http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTP2 and I wonder if it is the actual state, that SPDY is planned for squid 3.5, or is it allready implemented in the actual version. SPDY is not planned at all. Unless the SPDY people re-write their spec to drop all the features IETF WG determined to be incompatible with real world HTTP requirements. I am working on HTTP/2 support now and have some very basic code which should be sufficient to let an interception proxy operate over port 443 or port 80 with direct HTTP/2 connections happening. Sponsorship and/or assistance welcome. PS. Thanks for the reminder. I've updated the page. Amos
