Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] KeepAlive Module (#1476)

2018-04-12 Thread Guillaume Bour
@miconda the issue is fixed on trunk. Can I backport the fix in 5.1 branch ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1476#issuecomment-380770783___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] git:master:b8a75c1c: keepalive: cleanup rpc output (#1476)

2018-03-28 Thread Guillaume Bour
Module: kamailio
Branch: master
Commit: b8a75c1c4fda079515606eb59273945842aff1be
URL: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/b8a75c1c4fda079515606eb59273945842aff1be

Author: Guillaume Bour <guillaume.b...@diabolocom.com>
Committer: Guillaume Bour <guillaume.b...@diabolocom.com>
Date: 2018-03-27T21:56:49+02:00

keepalive: cleanup rpc output (#1476)

---

Modified: src/modules/keepalive/keepalive_rpc.c

---

Diff:  
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/b8a75c1c4fda079515606eb59273945842aff1be.diff
Patch: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/b8a75c1c4fda079515606eb59273945842aff1be.patch

---

diff --git a/src/modules/keepalive/keepalive_rpc.c 
b/src/modules/keepalive/keepalive_rpc.c
index 3444cf05c8..8efe0fb117 100644
--- a/src/modules/keepalive/keepalive_rpc.c
+++ b/src/modules/keepalive/keepalive_rpc.c
@@ -63,26 +63,11 @@ static const char *keepalive_rpc_list_doc[2] = {
 
 static void keepalive_rpc_list(rpc_t *rpc, void *ctx)
 {
-   void *foo, *bar, *baz;
void *sub;
ka_dest_t *dest;
char *_ctime;
char *_utime;
char *_dtime;
-   str text = str_init("foobar");
-
-   if(rpc->add(ctx, "Sd", , 42) < 0)
-   LM_ERR("failed creating RPC struct\n");
-   if(rpc->add(ctx, "Sd", , 42) < 0)
-   LM_ERR("failed creating RPC struct\n");
-
-   rpc->add(ctx, "{", );
-   rpc->struct_add(foo, "Sd", "text", , "number", 42);
-
-   rpc->add(ctx, "{", );
-   rpc->struct_add(bar, "[", "list", );
-   rpc->struct_add(baz, "d", "nn", 17);
-   rpc->struct_add(baz, "d", "nn", 22);
 
for(dest = ka_destinations_list->first; dest != NULL; dest = 
dest->next) {
rpc->add(ctx, "{", );


___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] KeepAlive Module (#1476)

2018-03-27 Thread Guillaume Bour
@miconda is it ok to backport the commit in 5.1 branch ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1476#issuecomment-376664116___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] KeepAlive Module (#1476)

2018-03-09 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hello @voztovoice 

This is some test code I forgot to remove.
I will clean it up this weekend. Which kamailio version are you using ? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1476#issuecomment-371785036___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc: contacts not deleted while 0x04 flag set in save() function (#1445)

2018-02-20 Thread Guillaume Bour
Closed #1445.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1445#event-1482875683___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc: contacts not deleted while 0x04 flag set in save() function (#1445)

2018-02-20 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hello @charlesrchance. I confirm with kamailio 5.1, contact deletion is 
replicated also.
Could be useful to add a short notice on 4.4 documentation :)

Thanks for your help, and your very valuable module

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1445#issuecomment-367043472___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc: contacts not deleted while 0x04 flag set in save() function (#1445)

2018-02-16 Thread Guillaume Bour
thanks @charlesrchance. I'll check and let you know

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1445#issuecomment-366298209___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc: contacts not deleted while 0x04 flag set in save() function (#1445)

2018-02-16 Thread Guillaume Bour
I finally found the delete event on server2 (generated by usrloc):
> DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f87b6dd0de8, 
> callback type 4/15, id 0 entered
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:578]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from 
> usrloc with type=4
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:600]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received 
> from DMQ... skip

I guess the problem comes from usrloc_sync.c, line 582:
> if (!(ptr->flags & FL_RPL)) [

My understanding is usrloc delete event is not propagated through DMQ if the 
contact was not not previously registered from the exact same server.
Why is it like that ?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1445#issuecomment-366271566___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc: contacts not deleted while 0x04 flag set in save() function (#1445)

2018-02-16 Thread Guillaume Bour
### Description

Hello,

related to #265 ,
I can reproduce the issue, with kamailio 4.4.6+jessie from kamailio debian 
repository

- 0x04 flag is set on save()
- old contacts are deleted on the server receiving the REGISTER message
- old contacts are not deleted on servers being notified via DMQ
 





### Troubleshooting

 Reproduction

- Setup 2 servers with dmq & dmq_usrloc replication between each other, and 
with registration on 1st
- Use 0x04 flag on save() function
- Register your softphones a 1st time  on 1 server: registration is replicated 
on 2d server, contact is on both servers 
- Reregister (with different contact) on same server: 
  - previous contact is deleted on 1st server
  - new contact is replicated to 2d server
  - previous contact is *NOT* delete on 2d server

 Log Messages

server1 (REGISTER message):

DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1692]: update_ucontact(): exists callback for 
type= UL_CONTACT_UPDATE
DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): 
contact=0x7f0096e0b548, callback type 2/15, id 0 entered
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:578]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from 
usrloc with type=2
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:548]: usrloc_dmq_send_contact(): sending 
serialized data 
{"action":1,"aor":"+33564093848","ruid":"uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2","c":"sip:+33564093848@xxx:41502;ob","received":"","path":"","callid":"ntoWjs3R3WpP9Z5rsi7Npmr2rRGKstls","user_agent":"CSipSimple_porridge-23/r2457","instance":"","expires":1518779539,"cseq":55952,"flags":0,"cflags":0,"q":-1,"last_modified":1518778639,"methods":8159,"reg_id":0}
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:299]: usrloc_dmq_send(): sending dmq 
broadcast...

server2 (DMQ recipient):

DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:327]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message 
received from sip:usrloc@172.16.67.15:5060
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:429]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): Received 
DMQ_UPDATE. Update contact info...
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:64]: add_contact(): aor: +33564093848
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:65]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: 
uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:66]: add_contact(): aorhash: -1799456359
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:72]: add_contact(): Found contact
DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1692]: update_ucontact(): exists callback for 
type= UL_CONTACT_UPDATE
DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): 
contact=0x7f3900243bd0, callback type 2/15, id 0 entered
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:578]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from 
usrloc with type=2
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:600]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact 
received from DMQ... skip
DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1004]: db_update_ucontact_ruid(): 
ruid:uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2
DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1133]: db_update_ucontact_ruid(): 
contact:sip:+33564093848@xxx:41502;ob
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:74]: add_contact(): Release record
DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain

the recipient receive an UPDATE message only.
according to usrloc_sync.c:usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(), UPDATE message add the new 
contact only (execute add_contact()), but the other one is not deleted

and there is no DMQ_RM message generated from the emitter

 
### Possible Solutions



### Additional Information

```
version: kamailio 4.4.6 (x86_64/linux) 
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, 
USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, 
TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, 
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, 
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown 
compiled with gcc 4.9.2
```

* **Operating System**:


```
3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux
```


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1445___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc replication and max_contacts (Kamailio v4.3.1) (#265)

2018-02-16 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hello,

I can reproduce the issue, with kamailio 4.4.6+jessie from kamailio debian 
repository:
* 0x04 flag is set on save()
* old contacts are deleted on the server receiving the REGISTER message
* old contacts are not deleted on servers being notified via DMQ




server1 (REGISTER message):
> DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1692]: update_ucontact(): exists callback for type= 
> UL_CONTACT_UPDATE
> DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f0096e0b548, 
> callback type 2/15, id 0 entered
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:578]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from 
> usrloc with type=2
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:548]: usrloc_dmq_send_contact(): sending 
> serialized data 
> {"action":1,"aor":"+33564093848","ruid":"uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2","c":"sip:+33564093848@xxx:41502;ob","received":"","path":"","callid":"ntoWjs3R3WpP9Z5rsi7Npmr2rRGKstls","user_agent":"CSipSimple_porridge-23/r2457","instance":"","expires":1518779539,"cseq":55952,"flags":0,"cflags":0,"q":-1,"last_modified":1518778639,"methods":8159,"reg_id":0}
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:299]: usrloc_dmq_send(): sending dmq 
> broadcast...

server2 (DMQ recipient):
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:327]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message 
> received from sip:usrloc@172.16.67.15:5060
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:429]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): Received 
> DMQ_UPDATE. Update contact info...
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:64]: add_contact(): aor: +33564093848
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:65]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: 
> uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:66]: add_contact(): aorhash: -1799456359
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:72]: add_contact(): Found contact
> DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1692]: update_ucontact(): exists callback for type= 
> UL_CONTACT_UPDATE
> DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:84]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f3900243bd0, 
> callback type 2/15, id 0 entered
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:578]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from 
> usrloc with type=2
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:600]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received 
> from DMQ... skip
> DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1004]: db_update_ucontact_ruid(): 
> ruid:uloc-5a86b8c5-31e0-2
> DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1133]: db_update_ucontact_ruid(): 
> contact:sip:+33564093848@xxx:41502;ob
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:74]: add_contact(): Release record
> DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain


the recipient receive an UPDATE message only.
according to usrloc_sync.c:usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(), UPDATE message add the new 
contact only (execute add_contact()), but the other one is not deleted

and there is no DMQ_RM message generated from the emitter

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/265#issuecomment-366211445___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] dmq_usrloc replication and max_contacts (Kamailio v4.3.1) (#265)

2018-02-16 Thread Guillaume Bour
Reopened #265.

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/265#event-1477698412___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] git:master:9875e64a: drouting: pull out unavailable destinations for sort_order 1 and 2

2017-08-15 Thread Guillaume Bour
Module: kamailio
Branch: master
Commit: 9875e64a95da6186ab616f1c560fc245916ac517
URL: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/9875e64a95da6186ab616f1c560fc245916ac517

Author: Guillaume Bour <guilla...@bour.cc>
Committer: Guillaume Bour <guilla...@bour.cc>
Date: 2017-08-10T21:35:54+02:00

drouting: pull out unavailable destinations for sort_order 1 and 2

- destinations are monitored with keepalive module (when 'enable_keepalive' 
option is set)
- it was already supported for sort_order 0 in a previous commit

---

Modified: src/modules/drouting/doc/drouting_admin.xml
Modified: src/modules/drouting/drouting.c

---

Diff:  
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/9875e64a95da6186ab616f1c560fc245916ac517.diff
Patch: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/9875e64a95da6186ab616f1c560fc245916ac517.patch


___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] drouting: pull out unavailable destinations for sort_order 1 and 2 (#1212)

2017-08-10 Thread Guillaume Bour

 Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

 Checklist:
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue # (replace  with an open issue number)

 Description

When destinations monitoring is enabled with option 'enable_keepalive' set to 
1, unavailable destinations will be ignored when calling do_routing() function
It was already implemented for sort_order 0 in a previous commit. 
This one adds the support for sor_order 1 & 2 also

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1212

-- Commit Summary --

  * drouting: pull out unavailable destinations for sort_order 1 and 2

-- File Changes --

M src/modules/drouting/doc/drouting_admin.xml (9)
M src/modules/drouting/drouting.c (62)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1212.patch
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1212.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1212
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] git:master:2d4d66ac: keepalive: improve documentation

2017-08-01 Thread Guillaume Bour
Module: kamailio
Branch: master
Commit: 2d4d66acd5a99ae7b931b7f7e4e7d500d6b9ae96
URL: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2d4d66acd5a99ae7b931b7f7e4e7d500d6b9ae96

Author: Guillaume Bour <guilla...@bour.cc>
Committer: Guillaume Bour <guilla...@bour.cc>
Date: 2017-07-31T21:59:50+02:00

keepalive: improve documentation

- documents internal API
- GH #1082

---

Added: src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive_devel.xml
Modified: src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive.xml
Modified: src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive_admin.xml

---

Diff:  
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2d4d66acd5a99ae7b931b7f7e4e7d500d6b9ae96.diff
Patch: 
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2d4d66acd5a99ae7b931b7f7e4e7d500d6b9ae96.patch


___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] keepalive: improve documentation (#1196)

2017-07-31 Thread Guillaume Bour
Merged #1196.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1196#event-1186467629___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] keepalive: improve documentation (#1196)

2017-07-31 Thread Guillaume Bour
- provides documentation for internal API 
- GH #1082

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1196

-- Commit Summary --

  * keepalive: improve documentation

-- File Changes --

M src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive.xml (1)
M src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive_admin.xml (21)
A src/modules/keepalive/doc/keepalive_devel.xml (146)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1196.patch
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1196.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1196
___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] Extend keepalive module documentation (#1082)

2017-04-24 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hi @agranig, @kamailio-sync @
First, the module is still young, so the documentation may be incomplete. I 
will improve it asap

Second, my primary idea when started this module was to implement the same 
"destinations probing" mechanism found in dispatcher module, both in drouting & 
carrierroute modules. So instead of directly patching those modules (and 
duplicating the same code), I regroup all probing features in *keepalive* 
module that also expose a set of APIs (to be documented) to register a 
destination and be notified of destination status change.
Following @miconda suggestions, it can also be used standalone

_What does that mean?_
So currently you can use it in 2 ways:
- standalone: destinations to monitor are statically defined as module 
parameter then you can use is_alive() function or event route to react to 
destination state change
- as "probing engine" for drouting module: by setting _enable_keepalive_ 
drouting parameter, drouting destinations will be monitored by keepalive, and a 
call to do_routing() will ignore inactive destinations in the resultset.
I will add examples to the documentation to make things clear, but you can 
already see a kamailio.cfg example for both case in this ml post: 
https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2017-March/096521.html

_What are the use cases and which problems does it solve?_
- monitor remote trunks (allowing to take actions or trigger an alert when a 
destination is down)
- ignore down destinations when routing a call

_Which mechanisms does it use (SIP, ICMP, others?)_
It is working the same way as dispatcher does, by regularly sending SIP OPTIONS 
to destinations

Hope I answered all your questions 

-- 
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1082#issuecomment-296810631___
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev