[SR-Users] Intercepting OPTIONS from nathelper
Hello! I need advice on how to intercept local SIP OPTIONS requests from the nathelper module for some adjustments? As far as I tested, it does not fall into the *event_route[tm:local-request]* Thanks in advance! # kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.7.1 (x86_64/linux) 1cf389-dirty -- BR, Denys Pozniak __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio IPSec module
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the reply.I will work on it. Regards,Hossein On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 12:03:34 AM PDT, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 15.05.24 22:09, H Yavari via sr-users wrote: Hi all, I was reviewing the `ims_ipsec_pcscf` code and noticed that this module creates a pool of sockets using different ports (ipsec_max_connections). I'm unclear on the necessity of this approach. Can't we simply create one server listener and one client listener to handle all UE connections? If this is feasible, is there still a need to create the pool at startup? I'm curious if this is due to an architectural limitation or if the IPSec module can be modified to replace the current implementation with a more efficient one. technically it is no restriction to have one client socket and one server socket. I am not much active in the VoLTE or VoNR, although I played lately with the later, but from some past discussions I understood that the specs suggest/recommend this approach with a pool of sockets -- I haven't read the specs to confirm personally if that's the case. Anyhow, during the OSMNT'24 and KamailioWorld'24 conferences, I had discussions with some participants interested in the topic and switching to (or adding the option of) single client/server socket was considered to be done in the future. For now, if you are concerned of using too many resources due to many children processes, you can use development version (git master branch) where you have the option to have threads for receiving traffic on UDP sockets, with a single pool of processes to handle the UDP SIP traffic: -https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/devel/core/#udp_receiver_mode Or, even better, if you can develop the code for having single client/server socket, just do it and make a PR. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] WebRTC-UDP voicemail and call transfer
Hello list, I'm trying implementing a solution like: https://github.com/havfo/WEBRTC-to-SIP/blob/master/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg The 2 problems I have a this moment are: Call from UDP phone to WebRTC phone, the WebRTC phone reject the call; the call go to voicemail but in the SDP still have WebRTC SDP During a SIP UDP - WebRTC Call tranfer the call using phone button... the transfer don't work. Any hint Regards -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio IPSec module
Hello, On 15.05.24 22:09, H Yavari via sr-users wrote: > Hi all, > > I was reviewing the `ims_ipsec_pcscf` code and noticed that this > module creates a pool of sockets using different ports > (ipsec_max_connections). I'm unclear on the necessity of this > approach. Can't we simply create one server listener and one client > listener to handle all UE connections? If this is feasible, is there > still a need to create the pool at startup? > > I'm curious if this is due to an architectural limitation or if the > IPSec module can be modified to replace the current implementation > with a more efficient one. technically it is no restriction to have one client socket and one server socket. I am not much active in the VoLTE or VoNR, although I played lately with the later, but from some past discussions I understood that the specs suggest/recommend this approach with a pool of sockets -- I haven't read the specs to confirm personally if that's the case. Anyhow, during the OSMNT'24 and KamailioWorld'24 conferences, I had discussions with some participants interested in the topic and switching to (or adding the option of) single client/server socket was considered to be done in the future. For now, if you are concerned of using too many resources due to many children processes, you can use development version (git master branch) where you have the option to have threads for receiving traffic on UDP sockets, with a single pool of processes to handle the UDP SIP traffic: - https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/devel/core/#udp_receiver_mode Or, even better, if you can develop the code for having single client/server socket, just do it and make a PR. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
