Re: [SR-Users] sngrep TLS connection
There are two options
1- use SIMPDUMP module to dup all SIP packets in Log file SIPDUMP Module
|
|
| |
SIPDUMP Module
|
|
|
2- use SIPTRACE module and broadcast SIP traffic from kamailio to any local
port and then capture through sngrep -p BROACST_PORT
SipTrace Module
|
|
| |
SipTrace Module
|
|
|
loadmodule "siptrace.so"
# check IP and port of your capture nodemodparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri",
"sip:127.0.0.1:9060")modparam("siptrace", "hep_mode_on", 0)modparam("siptrace",
"trace_to_database", 0)modparam("siptrace", "trace_flag",
22)modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1)# modparam("siptrace", "hep_version",
3)modparam("siptrace", "xheaders_write", 1)
during code use setflag(22); sip_trace();
This will broadcast SIP packet to local 9060 port and u can capture that
through sngrep.
I hope it will help.
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 01:08:44 PM GMT+5, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
Hello,
there were some limitations in sngrep for capturing tls traffic:
* https://github.com/irontec/sngrep/issues/112
Not sure if there was any work afterwards to improve. The best place to ask in
on sngrep project.
Anyhow, I want to add that if you use Kamailio, then you can load sipdump
module and get the traffic stored in pcap files -- it requires master branch:
*https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/sipdump.html#sipdump.p.mode
For stable branches, sipdump can store the traffic in text files.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08.12.20 08:37, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
As I remember sngrep doesn't work with TLS 1.3, so may be it is your case.
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 08:01 Agiftel, wrote:
Hi all, does anyone was able to use sngrep (with -k option) to decrypt TLS
connections?
I'am doing what help says; used private key is the correct one; but no
traffic is seen on sngrep.
If i use not ecrypted call i can see everything, so sngrep is working good.
Any hint?
regards
--
Sent from: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Users-f3.html
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] android client SIP TLS client autentication + kamailio
Hi, I have used it. Some older version of Android I think before Android 4.0 but not sure, does not support TLS so you have to work with older version of TLS or SSL. Security with HTTPS and SSL | Android Developers | | | | | | | | | | | Security with HTTPS and SSL | Android Developers | | | How to enable TLS 1.2 support in an Android application (running on Android 4.1 JB) | | | | | | | | | | | How to enable TLS 1.2 support in an Android application (running on Andr... As per the docs in Android for SSLSocket and SSLContext, TLS v1.1 and v1.2 protocols are supported in API level ... | | | Which Library you are using on Android ? On Wednesday, December 2, 2020, 07:37:02 PM GMT+5, beer Ll wrote: HelloHas anybody use a android SIP client with TLS client authentication enabled with kamailio?Do you have suggestion ? Many thanks Luca ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] MSTeams Kamailio with PBX Hold Refer issue
Hi, I have been trying to integrate MSTeams with PBX Through Kamailio. Calls
are working now. Hold has Issues. MSTeams uses REFER to manage this all with
NOTIFY.
I am sending t_send_reply("202", "Accepted");
when receive Refer now I need to send NOTIFY I think I can use t_uac_send()
NOTIFY I am unable to send t_uac_send properly on when recertifications refer
from MSTeams.
Any one with the experience on this ?
Thanks,___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag (setbflag)
Thanks a lot for all this :) On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 11:43:29 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov wrote: The flags only apply to branches created by Kamailio, not incoming branches. Relaying anything creates a new branch; changing the RURI does not affect that. On 11/29/20 1:40 PM, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi Alex, Thanks for the reply. I think branch is identified by RURI... > if we change the RURI and relay it to other hop then would it be new > Branch ? If we set BFlag in Request Route would it be available this > changed RURI for this transaction ? > > On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 11:21:48 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov > wrote: > > > It will be available within a particular branch, which is a subset of a > single transaction. > > On 11/29/20 1:20 PM, me.proje...@yahoo.com > <mailto:me.proje...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag? If its set in Request Route will > > it be available till end of Dialog or It will be available during > > Transaction only ? > > > > Thanks > > > > > ___ > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > > > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, <http://www.evaristesys.com/, > >http://www.csrpswitch.com/ <http://www.csrpswitch.com/> > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag (setbflag)
Hi Alex, Thanks for the reply. I think branch is identified by RURI... if we change the RURI and relay it to other hop then would it be new Branch ? If we set BFlag in Request Route would it be available this changed RURI for this transaction ? On Sunday, November 29, 2020, 11:21:48 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov wrote: It will be available within a particular branch, which is a subset of a single transaction. On 11/29/20 1:20 PM, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi, > > What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag? If its set in Request Route will > it be available till end of Dialog or It will be available during > Transaction only ? > > Thanks > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag (setbflag)
Hi, What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag? If its set in Request Route will it be available till end of Dialog or It will be available during Transaction only ? Thanks___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Kamailio Remove Remove "Allow" features from header
Hi, I want to remove some "Allow" features from my Kamailio SBC like I want to keep following only Allow: OPTIONS, NOTIFY, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER, How can I achieve that? Thanks,___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found
Wow great. Thanks for your help :)
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 10:54:25 PM GMT+5, Federico Cabiddu
wrote:
The outgoing (relayed) e2e ACK is not captured by the sipcapture module in
"transaction" capture mode (the default), because of tm module internals.You
have to explicitly capture it in the onsend_route.
onsend_route {
if ($rm == 'ACK') {
sip_trace();
}
}
Cheers,
Federico
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:47 PM Alex Balashov wrote:
On 11/24/20 12:35 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 November 2020 at 18:28:44, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> Hiddenly? :-)
>
> I like the word - I can think of several contexts it would be useful in, and
> the standard way of expressing the concept is so much less concise.
It's true; the closest and comparably terse adverb I can readily conjure
is "surreptitiously", which implies a more actively deliberate and
nefarious level of packet forwarding.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found
Hiddenly means without being captured in SIP_TRACE module
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 10:29:58 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov
wrote:
Hiddenly? :-)
-- Alex
On 11/24/20 12:22 PM, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> I can't see the ACK being relayed to MSTeams in network capture through
> in Relay Route
>
> if(is_method("ACK|BYE")) {
> sip_trace();
> setflag(22);
> }
> but call has been established successfully. is ACK is being relayed
> hiddenly by Kamailio ?
>
> On Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 09:35:32 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> If you take a look at the documentation for t_check_trans(), you'll see
> that it behaves in very different ways depending on the type of message
> it is handling, and is supposed to return a negative/false value in some
> scenarios or abort script execution -- context is very important:
>
> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_check_trans
> <https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_check_trans>
>
> There are two types of ACKs - hop-by-hop ACKs, which acknowledge
> negative final replies, and end-to-end ACKs, which are for successful
> final 2xx replies and meant to be relayed by Kamailio end-to-end, in the
> manner of a normal in-dialog request.
>
> An ACK of this nature is a separate request and a separate transaction,
> though its CSeq is identical to that of the INVITE transaction it is
> meant to acknowledge. However, a 2xx final reply will close an INVITE
> transaction, subject to `max_inv_lifetime` and `wt_timer`[1] and all
> that stuff:
>
> The documentation speaks to this point:
>
> "For end-to-end ACKs (ACKs to 2xx responses for forwarded
> INVITE transactions) it will return true if the corresponding
> INVITE transaction is found and still active and false if not.
>
> Note that the e2e ACK matching is more of a hint then a
> certainty. A delayed e2e ACK might arrive after the
> transaction wait time elapses, when the INVITE transaction
> no longer exists and thus would not match anything. There
> are also cases when tm would not keep all the information
> needed for e2e ACK matching (since this is not needed for
> a stateful proxy and it requires additional memory,
> tm will not keep this information unless needed by
> some other module or callbacks)."
>
> So, in other words, you should not expect t_check_trans() to return true
> for an end-to-end ACK. It is reasonable to expect that in the vast
> majority of cases, it will return false. The ACK should be relayed in
> the same manner as any other loose-routed in-dialog request, e.g. a
> reinvite or a BYE. If you follow the logic of the stock configuration
> that Kamailio ships with, this will happen correctly by default.
>
> -- Alex
>
> [1]
> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.wt_timer
> <https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.wt_timer>
>
> On 11/24/20 3:24 AM, me.proje...@yahoo.com
> <mailto:me.proje...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi When ACK is received on Kamailio from PBX t_check_trans() fails.
> > 200 OK sent PBX from Teams and ACK from PBX is provided here.
> >
> > What could be the issue.
> >
> > SIP/2.0 200 OK
> > FROM: "Ext1" <mailto:1102@PBX_IP>>;tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f
> > TO: <mailto:1101@KAM_IP>>;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41
> > CSEQ: 25772 INVITE
> > CALL-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58
> > VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP
> >
> PBX_IP:7790;received=PBX_IP;branch=z9hG4bKPj170912fc-0908-40bb-8248-9f6cb560332d;rport=7790
>
>
> >
> > RECORD-ROUTE:
> >
> ,,
>
>
> >
> > CONTACT:
> >
>
>
>
> >
> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 353
> > SUPPORTED: timer
> > CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp
> > ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY
> > REQUIRE: timer
> > SESSION-EXPIRES: 1800;refresher=uac
> > SERVER: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.11.16.5 i.USEA.5
> > X-Siptrace-Fromip: tls:KAM_IP:7790
> > X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:PBX_IP:7790
> > X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 607029
> > X-Siptrace-Method: INVITE
> > X-Siptrace-Dir: out
> >
> > ACK
> >
> sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=c825abba-7203-442c-8461-994522d14365;x-c=25f3c2ce3a635971b809dc3be872e51b/s/1/63c9eea743284db99366cabf5f7dcbf5;alias=.114.132.46~5061~3
>
>
> > SIP/2.0
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> > PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjaa30c14c-c965-473d
Re: [SR-Users] ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found
Thanks for your reply. I can't see the ACK being relayed to MSTeams in network
capture through in Relay Route
if(is_method("ACK|BYE")) { sip_trace(); setflag(22); } but call has been
established successfully. is ACK is being relayed hiddenly by Kamailio ?
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 09:35:32 PM GMT+5, Alex Balashov
wrote:
Hi,
If you take a look at the documentation for t_check_trans(), you'll see
that it behaves in very different ways depending on the type of message
it is handling, and is supposed to return a negative/false value in some
scenarios or abort script execution -- context is very important:
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_check_trans
There are two types of ACKs - hop-by-hop ACKs, which acknowledge
negative final replies, and end-to-end ACKs, which are for successful
final 2xx replies and meant to be relayed by Kamailio end-to-end, in the
manner of a normal in-dialog request.
An ACK of this nature is a separate request and a separate transaction,
though its CSeq is identical to that of the INVITE transaction it is
meant to acknowledge. However, a 2xx final reply will close an INVITE
transaction, subject to `max_inv_lifetime` and `wt_timer`[1] and all
that stuff:
The documentation speaks to this point:
"For end-to-end ACKs (ACKs to 2xx responses for forwarded
INVITE transactions) it will return true if the corresponding
INVITE transaction is found and still active and false if not.
Note that the e2e ACK matching is more of a hint then a
certainty. A delayed e2e ACK might arrive after the
transaction wait time elapses, when the INVITE transaction
no longer exists and thus would not match anything. There
are also cases when tm would not keep all the information
needed for e2e ACK matching (since this is not needed for
a stateful proxy and it requires additional memory,
tm will not keep this information unless needed by
some other module or callbacks)."
So, in other words, you should not expect t_check_trans() to return true
for an end-to-end ACK. It is reasonable to expect that in the vast
majority of cases, it will return false. The ACK should be relayed in
the same manner as any other loose-routed in-dialog request, e.g. a
reinvite or a BYE. If you follow the logic of the stock configuration
that Kamailio ships with, this will happen correctly by default.
-- Alex
[1] https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.wt_timer
On 11/24/20 3:24 AM, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi When ACK is received on Kamailio from PBX t_check_trans() fails.
> 200 OK sent PBX from Teams and ACK from PBX is provided here.
>
> What could be the issue.
>
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> FROM: "Ext1";tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f
> TO: ;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41
> CSEQ: 25772 INVITE
> CALL-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58
> VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP
> PBX_IP:7790;received=PBX_IP;branch=z9hG4bKPj170912fc-0908-40bb-8248-9f6cb560332d;rport=7790
>
>
> RECORD-ROUTE:
> ,,
>
>
> CONTACT:
>
>
>
> CONTENT-LENGTH: 353
> SUPPORTED: timer
> CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp
> ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY
> REQUIRE: timer
> SESSION-EXPIRES: 1800;refresher=uac
> SERVER: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.11.16.5 i.USEA.5
> X-Siptrace-Fromip: tls:KAM_IP:7790
> X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:PBX_IP:7790
> X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 607029
> X-Siptrace-Method: INVITE
> X-Siptrace-Dir: out
>
> ACK
> sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=c825abba-7203-442c-8461-994522d14365;x-c=25f3c2ce3a635971b809dc3be872e51b/s/1/63c9eea743284db99366cabf5f7dcbf5;alias=.114.132.46~5061~3
>
> SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjaa30c14c-c965-473d-bc49-9f223f9f634c
> From: "Ext1" ;tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f
> To: ;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41
> Call-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58
> CSeq: 25772 ACK
> Route:
> Route:
>
>
>
> Route:
> Max-Forwards: 70
> User-Agent: Asterisk
> Content-Length: 0
> X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790
> X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAM_IP:7790
> X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 615495
> X-Siptrace-Method: ACK
> X-Siptrace-Dir: in
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found
Hi When ACK is received on Kamailio from PBX t_check_trans() fails. 200 OK sent PBX from Teams and ACK from PBX is provided here. What could be the issue. SIP/2.0 200 OK FROM: "Ext1";tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f TO: ;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41 CSEQ: 25772 INVITE CALL-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58 VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;received=PBX_IP;branch=z9hG4bKPj170912fc-0908-40bb-8248-9f6cb560332d;rport=7790 RECORD-ROUTE: ,, CONTACT: CONTENT-LENGTH: 353 SUPPORTED: timer CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY REQUIRE: timer SESSION-EXPIRES: 1800;refresher=uac SERVER: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.11.16.5 i.USEA.5 X-Siptrace-Fromip: tls:KAM_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 607029 X-Siptrace-Method: INVITE X-Siptrace-Dir: out ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=c825abba-7203-442c-8461-994522d14365;x-c=25f3c2ce3a635971b809dc3be872e51b/s/1/63c9eea743284db99366cabf5f7dcbf5;alias=.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjaa30c14c-c965-473d-bc49-9f223f9f634c From: "Ext1" ;tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f To: ;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41 Call-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58 CSeq: 25772 ACK Route: Route: Route: Max-Forwards: 70
Re: [SR-Users] ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams
Just one more update in ACK t_check_trans() fail What shall be reason On Monday, November 23, 2020, 08:12:10 PM GMT+5, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi George Gogdlize, config file is mess at this stage. Will be able to get it working then can share it, at this moment stuck in this scenario if you have something working do let me know so I can implement that fix. Thanks, On Monday, November 23, 2020, 06:24:37 PM GMT+5, George Goglidze wrote: Hi, Any chance you could share the relevant config? I’m doing exact same thing integrating teams with on-premise pbx via Kamaili. Get Outlook for iOSFrom: sr-users on behalf of me.proje...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 1:07:15 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams Hi, I am integrating PBX with Teams via Kamailio Call is working but ACK delivery has an issue This is the ACK Kamailio receives from PBX I process the ACK with handle_ruri_alias(); and record_route_preset(AS per GUIDE LINES) But this change is not reflected in RELAY ACK from PBX ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0c344c6a-cd75-4095-9891-bf9445c28b82;x-c=5691aa770226562db7d3e16ab090e196/s/1/e857255ef2344e03bd1d12e270ef5e6c;ias=52.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjc50440d0-77db-4467-94cb-2f93c4f88538 From: "USER" ;tag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac To: ;tag=a2ce378b106949cf8bac8f978bb573fb Call-ID: 3dbc6680-fec3-4ba5-8232-6dda8c669bca CSeq: 23811 ACK Route: Route: Route: Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Asterisk Content-Length: 0 X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAMAILIO_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606135546 516717 X-Siptrace-Method: ACK X-Siptrace-Dir: in ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams
Hi George Gogdlize, config file is mess at this stage. Will be able to get it working then can share it, at this moment stuck in this scenario if you have something working do let me know so I can implement that fix. Thanks, On Monday, November 23, 2020, 06:24:37 PM GMT+5, George Goglidze wrote: Hi, Any chance you could share the relevant config? I’m doing exact same thing integrating teams with on-premise pbx via Kamaili. Get Outlook for iOSFrom: sr-users on behalf of me.proje...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 1:07:15 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams Hi, I am integrating PBX with Teams via Kamailio Call is working but ACK delivery has an issue This is the ACK Kamailio receives from PBX I process the ACK with handle_ruri_alias(); and record_route_preset(AS per GUIDE LINES) But this change is not reflected in RELAY ACK from PBX ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0c344c6a-cd75-4095-9891-bf9445c28b82;x-c=5691aa770226562db7d3e16ab090e196/s/1/e857255ef2344e03bd1d12e270ef5e6c;ias=52.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjc50440d0-77db-4467-94cb-2f93c4f88538 From: "USER" ;tag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac To: ;tag=a2ce378b106949cf8bac8f978bb573fb Call-ID: 3dbc6680-fec3-4ba5-8232-6dda8c669bca CSeq: 23811 ACK Route: Route: Route: Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Asterisk Content-Length: 0 X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAMAILIO_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606135546 516717 X-Siptrace-Method: ACK X-Siptrace-Dir: in ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams
Hi, I am integrating PBX with Teams via Kamailio Call is working but ACK delivery has an issue This is the ACK Kamailio receives from PBX I process the ACK with handle_ruri_alias(); and record_route_preset(AS per GUIDE LINES) But this change is not reflected in RELAY ACK from PBX ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0c344c6a-cd75-4095-9891-bf9445c28b82;x-c=5691aa770226562db7d3e16ab090e196/s/1/e857255ef2344e03bd1d12e270ef5e6c;ias=52.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjc50440d0-77db-4467-94cb-2f93c4f88538 From: "USER" ;tag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac To: ;tag=a2ce378b106949cf8bac8f978bb573fb Call-ID: 3dbc6680-fec3-4ba5-8232-6dda8c669bca CSeq: 23811 ACK Route: Route: Route: Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Asterisk Content-Length: 0 X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAMAILIO_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606135546 516717 X-Siptrace-Method: ACK X-Siptrace-Dir: in ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Re-Invite from callee With RTPEngine between RTP--SRTP
Hi, I have have Kamailio as SBC one-end is SRTP and other end is RTP
So I m using
rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection DTLS=passive
OSRTP-offer ICE=force SRTP")rtpengine_manage("replace-origin
replace-session-connection DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP")
1-Asterisk(RTP) -2-Kamailio/RTPEngine -- 3- Carrier with SRTP
I detect source IPs and to manage this all.
When call is made from 1 to 3 all works and during call 3 send re-Invite to
Hold Call .. We need to call rtpengine_manage and also when on 200OK reply of
re-invite from 1.
How shall I detect that 1- if this is Re-Invite (has_totag() )and 2- its from
Callee.
Please advise.
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, I added two scripts 1- to create tables 2- Insert some basic data in address table Statement 1 executed and tables created but second .sql file not executed although it showed in logs. What shall I do to insert some basic data? Thanks. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 07:03:04 PM GMT+5, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your reply. Some times we need to provide Initial Data in some tables so I think we can use something you suggested. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 06:00:23 PM GMT+5, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, if you put the sql to create the table in share/kamailio/mysql/customtable-create.sql then you can run: kamdbctl add-tables customtable This has to be done after the kamdbctl create command. If you plan for long term, also taking in consideration the option to add management of customtable records in the cli, I can recommend to look at kamcli: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli It can also create the customtable using: kamcli db create-tables-group customtable The 'kamcli db' offers what old 'kamdbctl' and 'kamctl db ...' do. But then you can just add your own python file in 'kamcli/commands/cmd_customtable.py' to manage records in that table (for example, you can use cmd_aliasdb.py as a starting point). Cheers, Daniel On 05.11.20 13:40, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks, ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, Thanks for your reply. Some times we need to provide Initial Data in some tables so I think we can use something you suggested. On Thursday, November 5, 2020, 06:00:23 PM GMT+5, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, if you put the sql to create the table in share/kamailio/mysql/customtable-create.sql then you can run: kamdbctl add-tables customtable This has to be done after the kamdbctl create command. If you plan for long term, also taking in consideration the option to add management of customtable records in the cli, I can recommend to look at kamcli: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamcli It can also create the customtable using: kamcli db create-tables-group customtable The 'kamcli db' offers what old 'kamdbctl' and 'kamctl db ...' do. But then you can just add your own python file in 'kamcli/commands/cmd_customtable.py' to manage records in that table (for example, you can use cmd_aliasdb.py as a starting point). Cheers, Daniel On 05.11.20 13:40, me.proje...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks, ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] How to Add Customer Table During Installation
Hi, I want add some custom Table Creation during installation of Kamailio. I want to add my Custom Table during the execution of kamdbctl create command. Currently I am adding my script in share/kamailio/mysql/auth_db-create.sql Thanks,___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Kamailio Relay Replies Issue
I have DID provider which is sending INVITES to Kamailio and kamailio has UAC module with asterisk to forward Calls to Asterisk with uac_auth() 1-DID Provider > (TLS)2-Kamailio (UDP) -> (UDP) 3-Asterisk Call from Kamailio to Asterisk is forwarded and answered but NON of the reply received in "MANAGE_REPLY" route is not relayed back to DID provider call get disconnected. =SIP DUMP INVITE FROM DID INVITE sip:+1...@kamailioserer.com:5061;user=phone;transport=tls SIP/2.0FROM: Alga Tech;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92TO: CSEQ: 1 INVITECALL-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2MAX-FORWARDS: 70VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715RECORD-ROUTE: CONTACT: CONTENT-LENGTH: 1103MIN-SE: 300SUPPORTED: timerUSER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.10.12.5 i.USEA.0CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdpALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFYSESSION-EXPIRES: 3600TH: dih ---Invite to Asterisk with AUTH INVITE sip:+1...@kamailioserer.com:5061;user=phone;transport=tls SIP/2.0FROM: Alga Tech;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92TO: CSEQ: 1 INVITECALL-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2MAX-FORWARDS: 69VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715RECORD-ROUTE: CONTACT: CONTENT-LENGTH: 1103MIN-SE: 300SUPPORTED: timerUSER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.10.12.5 i.USEA.0CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdpALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFYSESSION-EXPIRES: 3600TH: dih -- >From Asterisk to Kamailio SIP/2.0 100 TryingVia: SIP/2.0/UDP KAMAILIO-IP:7790;TH=ucv;rport=7790;received=KAMAILIO-IP;branch=z9hG4bK7317.fe3491996f35f580f2efa1c50081a62c.1;i=7Via: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;rport=8256;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715Record-Route: Record-Route: Record-Route: Call-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2From: "Alga Tech" ;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92To: CSeq: 1 INVITEServer: AsteriskContent-Length: 0TH: uch -- >From Asterisk to Kamailio SIP/2.0 180 RingingVia: SIP/2.0/UDP KAMAILIO-IP:7790;TH=ucv;rport=7790;received=KAMAILIO-IP;branch=z9hG4bK7317.fe3491996f35f580f2efa1c50081a62c.1;i=7Via: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;rport=8256;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715Record-Route: Record-Route: Record-Route: Call-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2From: "Alga Tech" ;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92To: ;tag=17f0e0ba-c1c0-457a-b0dd-9a9729d312e7CSeq: 1 INVITEServer: AsteriskContact: Allow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER, MESSAGE, REFERContent-Length: 0 -- >From Asterisk to Kamailio SIP/2.0 180 RingingVia: SIP/2.0/UDP KAMAILIO-IP:7790;TH=ucv;rport=7790;received=KAMAILIO-IP;branch=z9hG4bK7317.fe3491996f35f580f2efa1c50081a62c.1;i=7Via: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;rport=8256;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715Record-Route: Record-Route: Record-Route: Call-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2From: "Alga Tech" ;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92To: ;tag=17f0e0ba-c1c0-457a-b0dd-9a9729d312e7CSeq: 1 INVITEServer: AsteriskAllow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER, MESSAGE, REFERContact: Content-Length: 0TH: uch -- >From Asterisk to Kamailio SIP/2.0 200 OKVia: SIP/2.0/UDP KAMAILIO-IP:7790;TH=ucv;rport=7790;received=KAMAILIO-IP;branch=z9hG4bK7317.fe3491996f35f580f2efa1c50081a62c.1;i=7Via: SIP/2.0/TLS DID-IP:5061;rport=8256;TH=div;branch=z9hG4bK77976715Record-Route: Record-Route: Record-Route: Call-ID: 936ba28f302f5a5d9b09f32e2e7c41f2From: "Alga Tech" ;tag=28989e96e28d47d891b4d8d21d85fa92To: ;tag=17f0e0ba-c1c0-457a-b0dd-9a9729d312e7CSeq: 1 INVITEServer: AsteriskAllow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER, MESSAGE, REFERContact: Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersubSession-Expires: 3600;refresher=uacRequire: timerContent-Type: application/sdpContent-Length: 299TH: uch___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
