Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
This is usually a symptom of doing a double SDP rewrite, e.g. by making a call to rtpengine twice in the same script iteration, or making a call to rtpengine and then doing some other SDP rewrite operations either before or after that. Cheers On 2018-10-23 21:54, Wilkins, Steve wrote: Entire section. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:31 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hello all, I noticed double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data in the SDP section when using rtpengine with Kamailio. Has any else noticed this? Is there a way for Kamailio to remove one of them? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Thank for your insight and honesty Alex! I do appreciate feedback as it helps us grow...no matter our age. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:01 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine More generally, Steve, responding to some themes I see in your posts over the past few months: You have a habit of posting overblown speculations about problems and painting yourself into grossly overcomplicated interpretations that send you down spurious paths of troubleshooting. I think you need to seriously ponder Occam's Razor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor If you're running into an unexpected phenomenon, why do you assume it's a bug in Kamailio or a "de novo" problem? In fact, a little Googling will reveal that double SDP stanzas are a common question. https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-August/089538.html The simplest explanation is almost ALWAYS the correct one. Yes, occasionally it is possible to find a true, honest-to-god original bug in the product -- we all have. But it is not the explanation you should start with, nor one you should readily leap to, because it requires a lot more assumptions, so probabilistically, it is almost always the wrong theory. Consider it in terms of thermodynamics, mathematics, and the complexity introduced by additional moving parts if you like: If you see an unexplained flash of light, there are numerous possible explanations. Some are quite simple: optical-neurological phenomenon, reflection from the mirror of a passing car, etc. Some are extremely complicated and involve novel, unproven ideas in physics or cosmology. "Hey, what was that flash of ligth?" Which should you start with FIRST? Think about it critically ... -- Alex On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:51:12AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > I think you've crawled down that rabbit hole about two millennia > prematurely. There is a much simpler explanation for why you're > getting a duplicated SDP stanza - in the logic of your route script. > It's not a bug in Kamailio. > > I can't tell you exactly what the cause is, but I believe this avenue > of exploration will prove fruitful. It's a fairly common problem. > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:49:55PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > > > I was looking at the sdpops_mod.c code hoping that there was an easy way to > > remove a sess_version (Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0) > > structure, but there does not appear to be that functionality in that > > module. It might be a bit of work to remove a duplicate sess_version line. > > > > I am using Kamailio 5.1, does anyone know if this is an issue in later > > versions? > > > > Thank you, > > -Steve > > > ___ > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
More generally, Steve, responding to some themes I see in your posts over the past few months: You have a habit of posting overblown speculations about problems and painting yourself into grossly overcomplicated interpretations that send you down spurious paths of troubleshooting. I think you need to seriously ponder Occam's Razor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor If you're running into an unexpected phenomenon, why do you assume it's a bug in Kamailio or a "de novo" problem? In fact, a little Googling will reveal that double SDP stanzas are a common question. https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-August/089538.html The simplest explanation is almost ALWAYS the correct one. Yes, occasionally it is possible to find a true, honest-to-god original bug in the product -- we all have. But it is not the explanation you should start with, nor one you should readily leap to, because it requires a lot more assumptions, so probabilistically, it is almost always the wrong theory. Consider it in terms of thermodynamics, mathematics, and the complexity introduced by additional moving parts if you like: If you see an unexplained flash of light, there are numerous possible explanations. Some are quite simple: optical-neurological phenomenon, reflection from the mirror of a passing car, etc. Some are extremely complicated and involve novel, unproven ideas in physics or cosmology. "Hey, what was that flash of ligth?" Which should you start with FIRST? Think about it critically ... -- Alex On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:51:12AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > I think you've crawled down that rabbit hole about two millennia > prematurely. There is a much simpler explanation for why you're getting > a duplicated SDP stanza - in the logic of your route script. It's not a > bug in Kamailio. > > I can't tell you exactly what the cause is, but I believe this avenue of > exploration will prove fruitful. It's a fairly common problem. > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:49:55PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > > > I was looking at the sdpops_mod.c code hoping that there was an easy way to > > remove a sess_version (Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0) > > structure, but there does not appear to be that functionality in that > > module. It might be a bit of work to remove a duplicate sess_version line. > > > > I am using Kamailio 5.1, does anyone know if this is an issue in later > > versions? > > > > Thank you, > > -Steve > > > ___ > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Could you tell me what type of calls could cause this in a route script. I just do see what I could be doing to generate that. It only happens with rtpengine is enabled. Thank you. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 8:51 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine I think you've crawled down that rabbit hole about two millennia prematurely. There is a much simpler explanation for why you're getting a duplicated SDP stanza - in the logic of your route script. It's not a bug in Kamailio. I can't tell you exactly what the cause is, but I believe this avenue of exploration will prove fruitful. It's a fairly common problem. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:49:55PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > I was looking at the sdpops_mod.c code hoping that there was an easy way to > remove a sess_version (Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0) > structure, but there does not appear to be that functionality in that module. > It might be a bit of work to remove a duplicate sess_version line. > > I am using Kamailio 5.1, does anyone know if this is an issue in later > versions? > > Thank you, > -Steve > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
I think you've crawled down that rabbit hole about two millennia prematurely. There is a much simpler explanation for why you're getting a duplicated SDP stanza - in the logic of your route script. It's not a bug in Kamailio. I can't tell you exactly what the cause is, but I believe this avenue of exploration will prove fruitful. It's a fairly common problem. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:49:55PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > I was looking at the sdpops_mod.c code hoping that there was an easy way to > remove a sess_version (Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0) > structure, but there does not appear to be that functionality in that module. > It might be a bit of work to remove a duplicate sess_version line. > > I am using Kamailio 5.1, does anyone know if this is an issue in later > versions? > > Thank you, > -Steve > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
I was looking at the sdpops_mod.c code hoping that there was an easy way to remove a sess_version (Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0) structure, but there does not appear to be that functionality in that module. It might be a bit of work to remove a duplicate sess_version line. I am using Kamailio 5.1, does anyone know if this is an issue in later versions? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Alex, If this problem is a Kamailio "bug", is there a proper site to report it to? Thank you -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 7:44 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hi Alex, I just ran a test, and yes, there is an error in the rtpengine log "Error Parsing RTP Header" and there is a double SDP present. Thank you, -Steve -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 7:28 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine I would repeat my invitation to analyse RTPEngine logs for signs of a double offer/answer. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:03:11AM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > I should also note that when the 200 OK is received from Asterisk, it does > not have the double SDP, only after Kamailio forwards the 200 OK does the > double appear. > > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of > Wilkins, Steve > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:00 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version > (v) 0 data when using rtpengine > > No calls to fix_nated_sdp(). > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex > Balashov > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version > (v) 0 data when using rtpengine > > Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and > rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? > > -- > Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Hi Alex, I just ran a test, and yes, there is an error in the rtpengine log "Error Parsing RTP Header" and there is a double SDP present. Thank you, -Steve -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 7:28 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine I would repeat my invitation to analyse RTPEngine logs for signs of a double offer/answer. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:03:11AM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > I should also note that when the 200 OK is received from Asterisk, it does > not have the double SDP, only after Kamailio forwards the 200 OK does the > double appear. > > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of > Wilkins, Steve > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:00 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version > (v) 0 data when using rtpengine > > No calls to fix_nated_sdp(). > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex > Balashov > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version > (v) 0 data when using rtpengine > > Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and > rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? > > -- > Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
I would repeat my invitation to analyse RTPEngine logs for signs of a double offer/answer. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:03:11AM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > I should also note that when the 200 OK is received from Asterisk, it does > not have the double SDP, only after Kamailio forwards the 200 OK does the > double appear. > > -Steve > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of Wilkins, > Steve > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:00 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 > data when using rtpengine > > No calls to fix_nated_sdp(). > > -Original Message- > From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex > Balashov > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 > data when using rtpengine > > Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and > rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? > > -- > Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. > > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > ___ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
I should also note that when the 200 OK is received from Asterisk, it does not have the double SDP, only after Kamailio forwards the 200 OK does the double appear. -Steve -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Wilkins, Steve Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:00 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine No calls to fix_nated_sdp(). -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
No calls to fix_nated_sdp(). -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Let me check...Thank you. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
I thought using data would imply what I meant to say, but I guess I was wrong. Sometime I take to many shortcuts in typing. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:57 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Then your description of the problem, and the subject line of your post, is not accurate. :-) This should not be happening. What does the rtpengine log show for the given Call-ID? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:55 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Entire section. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:31 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hello all, I noticed double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data in the SDP section when using rtpengine with Kamailio. Has any else noticed this? Is there a way for Kamailio to remove one of them? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and rtpengine_offer/manage() successively? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Then your description of the problem, and the subject line of your post, is not accurate. :-) This should not be happening. What does the rtpengine log show for the given Call-ID? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:55 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Entire section. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:31 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hello all, I noticed double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data in the SDP section when using rtpengine with Kamailio. Has any else noticed this? Is there a way for Kamailio to remove one of them? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Entire section. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:31 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hello all, I noticed double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data in the SDP section when using rtpengine with Kamailio. Has any else noticed this? Is there a way for Kamailio to remove one of them? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine
Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line? -- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -Original Message- From: "Wilkins, Steve" To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data when using rtpengine Hello all, I noticed double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data in the SDP section when using rtpengine with Kamailio. Has any else noticed this? Is there a way for Kamailio to remove one of them? Thank you, -Steve ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
